The Crucilble - Miller shows several characters who are faced with difficult moral choices. They are changed by the experience and the audience go through catharsis watching them. How does millers treatment of moral issues add to the drama?

Authors Avatar

Miller shows several characters who are faced with difficult moral choices. They are changed by the experience and the audience go through catharsis watching them. How does millers treatment of moral issues add to the drama?

In this essay I will write about how Arthur Miller, director of “The Crucible” uses moral issues in the play to add to the drama and the thrilling scenes throughout the play. Every character in the play is faced with at least one or more moral issues, I will look at the main characters issues and explain how it adds to the drama.

In the play we see the events of the Salem trials in Massachusetts and we see exactly what the characters get up to and what issues face them throughout. The play was written in thought of the more recent events of the time in which it was made. Arthur Miller wanted to show the people what came of passing blame onto other people to try and get them to think right and treat people correctly.

In 1938 the House un-American Activities Committee Organization was made; it had the power to investigate any movement or person who threatened the safety of the state. They looked for people who agreed with communism in the 1940’s. America and the USSR were fighting, America was helping Korea to keep the freedom. America was worried that communism would spread to there land and that capitalism would be destroyed. People were asked if they were communist sympathizers and sometimes charged. They were also asked if they knew anyone else who went to meeting, and then forced to give there name. Actors, writers and film directors appeared in the committee and lost there job and industry. This made Miller write the play so the view of what happened then would relate with what was happening at this time.

The play was set in the 17th century, everything that we see today was much different then, although the society was a theocratic one just like today everything was different. The society had a massive male dominance and women were seen as much less than today. In the 17th century God was perceived as male and men were seen as the natural enforcers of his will. Women were seen as unstable because of there biological function. This was a time when peoples roles were clearly defined by gender. Women were made to walk with their head down and arms by their side. People weren’t aloud to indulge in anything that seemed to much fun, because they saw it as being related to the devil.

The play is about how a little fun had by some girls can accelerate quickly into a huge disaster by blaming other people and trying to get out of trouble. At this time it was a quite judgmental society; although a deeply religious Prodistent society they did not as a group of people practice forgiveness and Christian charity. This lead to a culture of blame which made it easy for people to simply reject criticism of themselves and to push the blame for events onto others. This will obviously lead to a horrific story and everyone who is blamed will take the punishment for what they have not done, but for what the people who have blamed them have done and not confessed to.

Join now!

        The girls are caught dancing and eventually it is thought that they were conjuring with the devil. To get themselves out of trouble they tell the people that some one else made them dance and do wrong, and say that they have the devil in them. This leads to loads of people being thrown into jail and hung for something they have not done. The girls hysteria leads onto more blaming and gets out of hand. Everyone involved with the hanging, persecuting and court has a moral issue, this is a issue of which there is two options; option one ...

This is a preview of the whole essay