• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Final Act is John Proctor's Stand in Court Against the Evil in his Society. Examine why he makes his individual Sacrifice and Explore how Miller Creates Dramatic Tension in this final act.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Crucible Coursework - Ruth Heatley 10NP The Final Act is John Proctor's Stand in Court Against the Evil in his Society. Examine why he makes his individual Sacrifice and Explore how Miller Creates Dramatic Tension in this final act The Crucible set in 1692, tells the story of a witch-hunt in Salem Massachusetts, a small Puritan community. Written by Arthur Miller in 1962, it is told through the eyes of John Proctor, a well-known man in Salem, whose adulterous involvement with Abigail Williams - the ringleader of the witch-hunt accusations, leads ultimately to the sacrifice of his own life. Puritanism was the only religion in Salem and brought with it strict rules that had to be adhered to. Puritans believed that every soul was predestined for heaven or hell and had a strong belief in the devil and his temptations, anyone seen to break any of the stern laws set down by the church suffered severe punishment, the harshest of which being death. The final act in the play shows John Proctor's stand in court against the evil and corruption in his society. When his wife is called into question and accused as a witch, he realises he must face the court and tell them the truth. ...read more.

Middle

The presence of Rebecca Nurse, a saint in his eyes, the importance of his name are all important factors as to why John Proctor gives up his life, but he also realises he will die a good man. It is the one good thing he can do for Elizabeth after all the pain he has caused her. There is a dignity in what he is doing for himself, Elizabeth and his own community. He is an important figure in his society and by standing up to the corruption and being brave enough he is truly doing the right thing but not just for himself. The last act shows John proctor's emotions and his own physical bodily actions 'in agony', but when he tears up his false testimony his can stand up straight for the first time. His death will also bring redemption from his own guilt. He has made a statement as to how un-just and corrupt their justice system was, and by leaving behind a world of prosecution and pragmatism he has become a man of principle. In act four, John Proctor decides to give up his own life rather than confess to being with the devil falsely. We encounter Proctor as a different character, a martyr, almost Christ like. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main reasons for the audiences' compassion is throughout the final act we see that although John Proctor has committed an unpardonable sin against his wife, you can see that when they meet for the final time, Elizabeth has finally forgiven him and their true love shines through for the first time. The play was filled with various different emotions, sins, politics, forgiveness and morals that altogether made it very real, and the fact that it was based upon genuine proceedings also made it very convincing. I thought the play was a real insight to what religion mixed with power can do to people, and what some of the consequences may entail. I enjoyed 'The Crucible' especially because it did not have a predictable ending and Arthur Miller keeps the audience guessing the over all conclusion until the very end of the play. I also enjoyed it because the overall hero was not completely faultless and his stand against the imploring corruption in his community was an excellent example of how quiet unlikely people can sometimes make the most difference. Arthur Miller uses many ideas as to why John Proctor makes his final decision, and uses character interaction, dialogue and stage directions to convey dramatic tension. The actions of the characters especially show the emotional strain in the last act when finally Proctor shows what a man he actually is. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    Catherine gets very excited and wants Rodolfo to herself. She wants to live with him and get married. Catherine tries to comfort Rodolfo by telling him how nice the country is but also wants him to stay with her. Additionally, another technique Miller uses to create tension is Dramatic Irony. For Example Catherine becomes torn between Eddie and Rodolfo.

  2. The crucible, God in heaven what is John Proctor?

    Proctor's sheer desperation for Elizabeth's forgiveness shows how deeply sorry he is and his true affection towards his wife. When Francis and Giles' wives are taken they come to Proctor for help, "They take my wife... And his Rebecca!" This emphasises the fact that Proctor is seen as a powerful and good man by the villagers.

  1. Create an outright contrast between the two protagonists - Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor. ...

    Does she look up to John Proctor to fill the role of a father, or is she genuinely in love with him? When Abigail meets John she immediately falls in love with him as she is overrun with emotions. She is very young and is still a child and sees no alternative to John so she immediately falls for him.

  2. The Crucible - How does Arthur Miller creates a sense of tension and conflict ...

    The dialogue in this scene, begins quite softly but becomes harsh, as Elizabeth and John argue at the climax of the scene.

  1. How does Miller use the development of characters and their interaction with others to ...

    Miller shows this through the interaction between both Danforth and Hale. Danforth says "Mr Hale, believe me; for a man of such terrible learning you are most bewildered - I hope you will forgive me... (To Proctor and the others.)

  2. In Act 3 of 'The Crucible' consider how Miller usesCharacter, language and dramatic devices ...

    "Did you not . . . sick in bed?" Danforth is shocked and questions Mary's presence; this also creates tension to whether to what Mary has to say will have an influence on the attempt to expose the girls. Danforth little questions Proctor about the reasons why Mary Warren was in the court.

  1. How and why does Arthur Miller encourage audience sympathy for John Proctor

    Proctor says to Putnam,' This society will not be a bag to swing around your head'. This shows although Proctor dislikes Putnam he does so for the right reasons, he believes Putnam is taking from the society of Salem and Proctor is protecting the interests of the other villagers, and he is also showing his honest side.

  2. Focusing on Act 3, to what extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an ...

    To me Parris is evil because a person of God is meant to help out people especially in this case but he doesn't, where as the other reverend Hale is supportive and tries to get both sides of the story to come an conclusion In act 3 Hale realises that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work