• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Handmaid's Tale - Margaret Atwood, 'Discuss the Gileadean concept of "Freedom from, freedom to".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

English Literature The Handmaid's Tale - Margaret Atwood 'Discuss the Gileadean concept of "Freedom from, freedom to" The dystopian novel, 'The Handmaid's Tale' implies the fact that there are two types of freedom, freedom to and freedom from. It is the paradox between 1980's America and Gilead that is examined continually throughout the novel and it's the ideas of 'freedom to' being a society of broad-minded morals and 'freedom from' the more controlled, restrictive society with an imposition upon individual freedom that are most prominent. In Atwood's thought-provoking novel, two societies with conflicting ideologies and concepts of liberty are juxtaposed through a series of flashbacks in an attempt to examine how people would cope when society suddenly deprived its people of freedom and denied them of information. The first society of modern America with its liberal customs, is compared and contrasted to the second society of Gilead, a totalitarian Christian authority which has taken control over America in the 1980's to save it from its declining birth rate and high levels of moral corruption. The protagonist of the novel, Offred, documents the history of the two contrasting societies as she recounts with both sentimentality and clarity, the images and memories of her past life as an American women and those of her present life living under the Gileadean regime as a Handmaid. ...read more.

Middle

She affirms that a freedom from being exposed to the indulgence and dissolution of the previous society is far superior to the ability to make trivial decisions in life. It is evident that at the centre of the Gileadean regime, is the responsibility to protect women. In the time before the establishment of Gilead, people were at liberty and had 'freedom to' commit crime, take drugs, abuse others and live as they saw fit. The lack of 'freedom from' in the time before, compared with the apparent 'freedom from' sexual crimes, degradation and attack in Gilead is startling. In effect, what is most apparent in Gilead is that women have the freedom from having to make choices, which is not freedom at all. The distinct differences between the limitations on men and those applied to women provide an insight for the reader in reference to Gilead's patriarchal intentions and social hierarchy. Men have both a recognised higher status and a provision of control. Women are merely for breeding purposes and are doled out to those men who have worked their way up the social hierarchy and who are now "permitted to touch women." It seems as though Atwood has implied that if Gilead could have got rid of women altogether it would have, but that a society cannot function without women as the ability to produce another generation lies solely in their hands. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any regime where an individual's only value is their role in society, whether it is to procreate or to keep the society under control, cannot be seen as superior in its approach to its public. A society where individuals do not have the freedom of speech and where their roles are predetermined by their gender is obviously not one of equality. Therefore, I can only conclude that a society where the policy is 'freedom to' is of a higher status, as long as it has it's limitations. I can sympathise with Atwood's criticisms of modern society, however, the Gileadean approach to life where gender and age determine your fate and most things are permitted, is not the solution. In conclusion, Atwood's representations of the two extremes of freedom are telling in their ability to provoke thought from the reader, as when they are compared, it causes the reader to realise not to take the societies within which we are living for granted, as things could be much worse. The extreme religious society of Gilead with its oppressive 'freedom from' approach, although beneficial in that the population is free from crime and corruption, are not free themselves, living lives of fear under the regime. Joanna Lowe Page 1 Mrs Hillyard ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Margaret Atwood section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Margaret Atwood essays

  1. The Handmaid's Tale - What are the main methods of control in the Gileadean ...

    However people, including Moira, knew things were going to change. Moira claimed 'they've been building up to this,' Moira had been expecting something to happen for a while. From then on things began to gradually change, gradually taking away peoples freedom 'newspapers were censored' to prevent people from seeing the

  2. Explore the issues concerning women and feminism raised in The Handmaids Tale

    All her effort in fighting for women's right to freedom and refusing to follow the structured rules of Gilead have lead her to being trapped in the colonies, this is the same for Moira although they have both openly expressed their rebellion but she has become a prostitute for the commanders so she still is trapped within the society.

  1. Compare and contrast "The Wars" and "The Handmaid's Tale".

    It could be old clips, it could be faked... They only show us victories, never defeats." (Atwood 101-2) Knowledge is seen as dangerous to the handmaids and any other unprivileged individuals. The Gileadean society in "The Handmaid's Tale", like "The Wars" uses a great deal of ceremony in their society to support the actions of the government.

  2. What I have learnt so far about the Regime in 'The Handmaid's Tale'

    'Why do I want?' is the questioning to herself that why and what does she want when she should be happy to be used but the natural human desire is to always want more and the need for transcend. Here we can see a clear definition of utilitarianism.

  1. What analysis of the female role does Margaret Atwood offer in ' The Handmaid's ...

    A handmaid's name simply reflects who owns them, and so they are subsequently stripped of any individuality. Every time a handmaid hears her new name, she is reminded that she is no more than property, and never reminded of her sovereign individuality.

  2. "The Handmaid's Tale" Societies Assignment.

    Language is one of these devices, since its function in Gilead is to label each individual with his tribute to the society, making repression a result of such use. This makes the persecution of black ("Children of Ham") people and Jews ("Sons of Jacob")

  1. "The Handmaids Tale" By Margaret Atwood, "The importance of being Ernest" by Oscar Wilde ...

    If Offred or any person deviates from the rules they are sent out to die slowly of radiation sickness or hanged at 'The wall'. The section I have chosen is the first time Offred is introduced to the Commanders Wife in chapter three.

  2. Conformity in Margaret Atwood's Novel: The Handmaid's Tale

    Offred is a clear example of a non-conformist; she desires her old life and she frequently acts out in small rebellious ways in order to demonstrate to the government that she is not their pawn and that they do not control her.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work