• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The issue that I am going to address in this essay is the debate over banning smoking in public places.

Extracts from this document...


PSHCE Coursework B The issue that I am going to address in this essay is the debate over banning smoking in public places. A lot of people feel very strongly on this issue despite the opinion they have. The reasons range from a health point to everybody's rights as individuals. I think that people feel so strongly about it because it is a new scheme, which may ban something that the country is very used to. Some people (mainly non-smokers) believe a ban would be a good thing whilst (mainly smokers) believe that it would be a bad thing. There has been smoking in public places for a long time and the sudden change will have quite a significant effect on people. I will evaluate the different opinions in this essay and give my opinion. The first opinion I have is a pro-smoking ban view. My source for this was www.weeklygripe.co.uk/a54.asp. ...read more.


It also says that many smokers wish to quit however there are a percentage who enjoy a cigarette and if smoking is banned it will detract from their enjoyment of life. I personally hold the perspective of the pro-smoking ban argument and that is what I think should be done about the situation. I despise the atmosphere that clings to smokers and particularly the undesirable health effects and odour caused by passive smoking. I think that they have every right to hold this opinion, as people who want smoking to be banned in public places are normally non-smokers, despite some of them being smokers who want to quit. Everybody should have the right to go out for a meal or a quiet drink without being engulfed in waves of foul cigarette smoke. If you are trying to give up this will not make it any easier and if you are a non-smoker you are inhaling fumes which are even more disgusting because you have not experienced before as much. ...read more.


* Arsenic (Poison used as an insecticide) * Cyanide (Poison which can cause brain damage and comas) * Butane (Lighter Fuel) * Cadmium (An heavy metal) * DDT (Pesticide which causes birth defects) * Ethanol (Alcohol) * Formaldehyde (Carcinogen used to preserve corpses) * Hexamine (Barbecue Lighter) * Methanol (Rocket Fuel) * Naphthalene (Moth Balls) * Nitrobenzene (Fuel Additive) * Toluene (Industrial Solvent) * Vinyl Chloride (Plastic Pipes) If smokers realised this and they have some common sense they would stop. If these toxins were not expelled in second hand smoke then I wouldn't mind however they are and I do not want these chemicals in my body. My personal opinion on this matter is that smokers should not be allowed to smoke in public places, if at all which costs the NHS billions. It is incredibly damaging and increases risks of contracting Cancer, especially Lung Cancer. If I had the final say smoking would be banned outright everywhere which would save thousands of lives and save the NHS money which it does not have to spend on suicidal individuals who inhale cyanide. ?? ?? ?? ?? Andy Cain 111 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Smoking should be banned in all public places

    Even tourists who smoke would not buy these cigar sticks, as they cannot smoke at any place other than their own private, personal rooms. It may be so that due to the banning the countries' revenue may dwindle but think if you are ready to sacrifice millions of others just for this simple reason.

  2. Should smoking be banned in public places?

    be responsible for their actions and respect other people's choice of freedom as well as their own. For instance in a restaurant the smokers, should they feel the urge to have a cigarette, should be the ones to get up, move away and even go outside away from the non-smokers,

  1. Why do teenagers decide to smoke and drink alcohol?

    But they're wrong, it just makes them get used to those bad habits without knowing how to overcome off the situation. They shall not make what other people tell them to do, they need to made their own decisions without caring about what someone else might say.

  2. Should smoking be banned in public places?

    If people want to smoke they can smoke elsewhere and not where it endangers other people's health. There are no real advantages and a lot of disadvantages to smoking, so if people need to do it, they should do in private or in their own home.

  1. Topic: Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places?

    Smokers who smoke amongst non-smokers must realise that it is very unpleasant. The rancid smell from the cigarette and the coughing from the smoker would put you of from going back into the town. Many people would rather stay at home than to face the smokers.

  2. a case study on smoking and it's effects

    This meant that the soldiers influenced their children to smoke as children copied their parents to make themselves feel more valued againt the war heroes. In the long run generations were influenced into smoking, this partially explains the abundance of smokers regardless of the now known medical effects.

  1. Because of the effects smoking has on you and others should it be banned ...

    So just because smoking is so addictive and smokers cant give up why should non-smokers suffer? Some people think of cigarette smoke as their worst enemy as it kills friends and family each day, so why should people suffer walking into a pub or restaurant being intoxicated with smoke.

  2. Comparison Of President Bush's RTE Interview And His Address To Congress

    From the outset the speech has a formal register. After a prolonged ovation when he is announced the President opens with a measured deliberate introduction to the assembled Congress and the American people. He uses a low, almost reverential monotone which has the effect of drawing in and refocusing his audience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work