• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Language of Prosecution in Albert Camus's 'The Outsider'

Extracts from this document...


World Literature Essay 2 The Language of Prosecution in Albert Camus's 'The Outsider' Meursault is brought to the Algerian court a murderer. The public prosecutor and his own defense lawyer, who has been appointed to him by the state of Algeria, are brought in front of a public jury and three judges to determine whether Meursault shall be convicted of this crime with or without mitigating circumstances. When the prosecution is able to convince the jury that the murder was premeditated, Meursault is sentenced to a public decapitation. This sentence is largely due to the incompetence of Meursault's own defense lawyer as well as the cunning use of language and subtle comprehension of public sentiment which faces Meursault in the form of the court's public prosecutor. This essay will attempt to examine the prosecution's effective use and understanding of the language of the Algerian courtroom. This essay will also explore the impact of this use of language on Camus's message and protagonist. The defense and prosecution attempt to use an intricacy of courtroom babble in the cross-examination of their witnesses. The first witnesses subject to this are Thomas Perez, the warden and the caretaker from Meursault's mother's home for seniors. These men can only base their accounts on the one day they encountered Meursault, the day of his mother's funeral. These witnesses, called by the prosecution, are the first to underline the irony of the prosecutor's case. ...read more.


As evidence of the jury's severe conviction demonstrates, the prosecutor has successfully dehumanized Meursault in the eyes of the jury and judges. Meursault is, in effect, doomed before the trial even begins when his lawyer declares that "he was confident of success" (64). What success can there be for a man who has already been proved guilty? Though the lawyer may only be assuring Meursault that he feels confident of his ability to disprove the possible declaration of the premeditation of the crime, the statement already suggests that there is a distinct lack of clarity in the defense lawyer's communicative skills. Meursault's case is one of interest to the public of Algiers because Meursault has denied the social codes and human faculties which 'normal' society, represented by the audience in the courtroom, feels bound by. The prosecutor uses the gasps of shock and the astonished silences of the public in the courtroom to sway the jury's opinion. The prosecutor demonstrates a more dynamic and subtle control over the sentiments of the courtroom than the defense lawyer with the exercise of dramatic changes in his tone of voice and expression. The lawyer convinces the courtroom, and even Meursault, of his confidence in his assertions and his disgust with an act that he wishes them to consider condemnable with his tone of voice. As Meursault himself records, "the prosecutor remarked in a malicious tone, 'That will be all for the present'" (85). ...read more.


Following the prosecutor's logic in condemning Mersault, the more socially criminal his behavior (such as an involvement in physical abuse), the more likely it is that the Arab's murder was premeditated. In the prosecutor's final summation of Meursault's guilt of the premeditation of this murder, he includes a discussion of Meursault's actions at his mother's funeral, with Marie and then with Raymond, highlighting Camus's true purpose of this trial. The prosecutor even states that the trial has superseded in nature and significance the parricide trial to follow, because the moral killing of his mother is more odious than the physical killing of a father or an Arab. In an intentionally loquacious and redundant speech, the prosecutor even goes to the extent of saying of Meursault, "a man whose heart is so empty that it forms which threatens to engulf society." This rash but comprehensive speech concluding the prosecutor's case convinces its audience of Meursault's threat to society. This is the defense lawyer's last chance to question this lawyer's line of prosecution, but he does not do so. The prosecution can, in truth, face little objection because there is no possible reason with which to justify Mersault's five bullets. Camus has set up a murder without any justification and forces our society to deal with the murderer who feels no remorse, only indifference. The absurdity of the irrelevance of the prosecution's line of questioning becomes immaterial when it is accepted that Meursault is not on trial for murder but for his moral character to which his defense can offer no redeeming testimony- society could not accept Meursault's existentialist survival. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Albert Camus section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Albert Camus essays

  1. Is Meursault an absurd hero? Is he a moral monster? Is he a rebel ...

    At his trial, the prosecutor brings out evidence about how Meursault did not cry at the funeral of his mother, rather than trying to prove him guilty of shooting the Arab (of which he is obviously innocent). Meursault is therefore put on trial for his values, rather than for his supposed crime.


    It is these reactions of indifference which reflect the 'absurd' idea. This 'matter of fact' reaction towards death illustrates to us the existentialist or absurd reasoning - that death is only a part of life, therefore it means nothing to die but it is rather just a means to an end.

  1. Albert Camus

    die they would be totally depressed yet Meursault "I'd been happy, and that I was still happy (p117)" this makes us wonder if Meursault knew that in life there will always be death and that no matter how you try to dodge it, it will always come back to you

  2. Explore how the writers use the technique of defamiliarisation to reveal hidden truths about ...

    It requires the defamiliarisation of Gregor for the reader to be made aware that even family relationships are often founded on selfish need rather than love. Although Gregor desperately tries to communicate with his family revealing that all humans need to be able to communicate, to be understood and to be loved.

  1. The Outsider

    This stream of thoughts and feelings he says came from the "bottom of my heart" (p. 115) and are describes as being a "paroxysm of joy and anger". This is very different from the Meursault we have learnt to understand throughout the novel.

  2. This is the commentary on the book "The Outsider" written by Albert Camus. I ...

    He simply does not care about that. Meursault is amoral; he cannot make difference between good and bad. Raymond asked him to write the letter for his girlfriend, which Meursault does without realising the consequences. Meursault's indifference seems to apply solely to his understanding of himself.

  1. The role of judgement in The OutsiderThe actions of Meursault, the protagonist in The ...

    Using these rational interpretations of Meursault's irrational actions, like the one that I just pointed out, the prosecutor manages to convince the jury in his speech of his conclusion that Meursault is an immoral "monster". 'For though in the course of my long career I have often had occasion to

  2. English World Literature Essay

    that his boss will be angry with him for taking two days off to go to the rest home where his mother was staying before she died. This immediately demonstrates Meursault's lack of feeling or emotion over death. In his view, everyone dies eventually and it is inevitable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work