The Lord of the Flies how the use of symbolism helps the reader to understand the breakdown of law and order.

Authors Avatar

Lord of the Flies

William Golding’s novel “Lord of the Flies” is set in around the 1950s on a small remote island in the Pacific and is about a group of boys who are stuck on this island how easily they descend into savagery. The question I will be asking in this essay is how the use of symbolism helps the reader to understand the breakdown of law and order.

The novel begins with a meeting of all the boys who have been stuck on the island after a plane crash. The boys elect Ralph as their leader but Jack is not very happy about this. Next the boys decide to make a fire to alert any ship passing by to rescue them but this fire is quickly allowed to go out when most of the become more interested in hunting pigs. Then a darker side is show of the boys when they become carried away in a tribal style dance and kill Simon the Christ like figure. After this most of the boys decide to form a different tribe so they can concentrate on hunting but become so savage they end up killing Piggy, the fat boy with asthma, and chase after Ralph trying to kill him. Just before Ralph is almost caught a ship arrives to rescue them and suddenly all traces of savagery vanish. The main themes of this novel are good and evil and savagery. The main symbols in the novel are the conch, Piggy’s glasses, the Lord of the Flies, painted faces and the Beast in us.

Join now!

At the beginning of the novel the island is introduced as paradise in which everything is perfect in which nothing can go wrong. When describing the island Golding uses lots of imagery in phrases like:

        “The shore was fledged with palm trees”

Golding also uses lots of colour especially when he says:

        “Within the irregular arc of coral the lagoon was a mountain , blue of all shades and shadowy green and purple.”

Using these techniques together Golding creates a very graphic image of the island. As the novel develops the seems to turn against them because the fruit ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

It is of vital importance that candidates pay attention to what they're writing, as this candidate has clearly neglected to do. A lot of what they have written contradicts itself, and there are silly mistakes made that a simple proof-read would fix: "the forest is burned down when Jack’s tribe set it alight when chasing Jack", being a prime example.

The Level of Analysis is below average, and the candidate is operating at a low C/high D grade for GCSE. The reason for this low grade is because the candidate mentions a lot of things that could be analysed, but neglects to actually put in the leg-work and do it. This feature-spotting limits the essay greatly, as anyone can identify and evidence literary devices like "Golding uses lots of imagery in phrases like [example removed]", but the candidate simply does not comment on the effect of these devices. They should go on to say how the use of surreal colours and the mental image of a tranquil paradise affects the readers and what it says about the island (everything in the novel is symbolic as it is an allegorical novel, which relies heavily on symbolism to convey it's connotative messages). There is a good identification of the transition of certain symbols before and after the degradation of society, law and order, such as with the example above, where the candidate recognises the relevance of the peacefulness of the island before it is burnt down by a fire. This gets points but as before, the effect needs to be analysed.

This candidate's response is fairly focused on the question proposed, which orientates around the symbolism William Golding uses in his novel 'Lord of the Flies' to represent the degradation of humanity and civilisation. The answer gets off to a very clunky start, and it is here that the candidate does not gain many marks at all, as they are merely recollecting the events of the novel. Whilst it is important to demonstrate an understanding of the entire novel, it should be done with far better analytical dexterity than simply blocking it into a paragraph at the beginning of the essay. The introductory paragraph should be like a book-end, with no real analytical substance, more rather an orientation of the essay's focus. There is evidence the candidate has tried this, but the evidence they give of knowledge of the text should be integrated into the rest of the essay only where relevant (so, analysis of the conch would incorporate events regarding the conch and nothing else, to show holistic novel understanding).