• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Merchant of Venice The Director’s Interpretation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Merchant of Venice The Director's Interpretation. The play "The Merchant of Venice" was written about 1596 by the great English playwright William Shakespeare. Although the play has gone through some revisions it has never been changed a great deal. In the past fifty or so years as Hollywood has come into light and the movie adaptations of some of Shakespeare's greatest plays have been shown in a different perspective, they have given us other peoples pre-conceptions of the play. The Merchant of Venice is no different with several variations of the play on the silver screen. In this piece of work I am going to show how the director of the play has changed it in any way from what I thought of the original text. It was directed and produced by Jonathan Miller and starred Lawrence Oliver. As I read the text I had many of my own pre-conceptions about setting, characters, personalities, traits and how they moved around the stage, and that the play would remain intact on the big screen-how wrong I was. First I will deal with the characters how the text made me feel towards them and how I thought they would look. Lawrence Oliver portrayed Shylock enigmatically as he always had the presence of power and forcefulness on screen through his actions and words. I imagined Shylock to be a short, withered man who was quite plump, greedy, bald and of no conscience what so ever. ...read more.

Middle

I pictured a man in his late twenties, tanned and of high stature in society as he had a lot of money and his personality was that of happiness and of the joy of life which was being taken away from him by the cruel and tyrannical Shylock. Whenever I saw him in the film I saw a man of about 65 standing sullen as a priest at a funeral who was uncaring as to whether he lived or died at the hand of Shylock he kept, "Saying take your bond". I felt no sympathy whatsoever for him as he didn't particularly want it. I felt his being cast as Antonio was all-wrong and that he was there as more of a sidekick to Shylock whom I felt was the main character. Portia I imagined to be a fair maiden in her early twenties with blonde hair and blue eyes who disapproved of all her suitors and must be a looker as she had so captively won the heart of the young Bassanio the prince of Arragon and Morocco. My preconception was all wrong as there was a woman who was about 40 wasn't that nice looking and to all viewers her personality towards everyone except Bassanio was less than pleasant. She constantly acted as a snobbish spoilt brat towards her servants and also her guests as she constantly forgot Jessica's name. ...read more.

Conclusion

I also found that characters lines were shortened and that very often scenes such as the one with Old Gobbo and Lancelot were completely cut out. The director was able to convey different emotions through the words than what I thought, such as whenever Shylock is referred to as that Jew. In the play I imagined it to be said without an ounce of prejudice. It was said in the play with contempt of Shylock and could change what people think the play's theme is about from the bonds that exist between people to anti-Semitism. I also felt the play changed what my view of Jessica and how Important she was as Portia kept forgetting her name as if she was insignificant. Also of her father and how I thought she was happy about leaving him but after the trial of Antonio and the downfall of the Jew her father who was humiliated due to the fact that he had to become a Christian as this is unfair punishment. She is upset and looks sad, and there is nothing in the text to support these two things even happening. All in all the play didn't live up to my expectations and I believe the director took too many liberties when making the film. But it is true that my pre-conceptions of a book or play are different than the next mans. By Charles O' Loan S1F ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE The Merchant of Venice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE The Merchant of Venice essays

  1. How important are bonds and promises in ‘The Merchant of Venice’?

    in Venice will take a sudden downfall and also many more exceptions would have to be made if this one is to be made as well: Is dearly bought; 'tis mine and I will have it.

  2. Free essay

    Belmont is a place of youth, happiness and concord, Venice a place of age, ...

    She uses these laws of Venice to strip Shylock of everything including his religion, money and his pride. Still, Portia is not only contented with that, Shakespeare uses her character and the ring trick to take strife back to Belmont.

  1. "All that glistens in not gold" Explore the theme of deception in the Merchant ...

    disliked Shylock as a Jew, but also because they know that Shylock would not approve of the marriage and Jessica becoming a Christian. The elopement deception is a major issue because, as a result of it, the intense anguish felt by Shylock leads him to seek revenge through Antonio and the "pound of flesh".

  2. "All that glistens is not gold" Explore the theme of deception in the Merchant ...

    Again, this is another deception as later in the play Shylock wants full revenge by taking his pounds of flesh from Antonio. These are two deceptions played on Antonio by Shylock. An Elizabethan audience might expect nothing less of a Jew.

  1. Why is the trail scene so important and how would you bring the drama ...

    I am a Jew. '' let him stand before our face''- against is the duke is a prejudice man who only has care for Christian. In the first few lines of the duke; we can realise that he has no sympathy towards shylock because he is a Jew.

  2. The merchant of VeniceWhy is the trail scene so important and how would you ...

    And why, because the room is full of Christians and shylock is the only Jew there. In Venice Jews are hated because there's Anti-Semitism show in Venice. Shylock is the subject to abuse is it state that in Act 3 Sense 1, '' laughed at my loses mocked my nations,

  1. Imagine you are the theatrical director of a production of

    Bassanio should generally approach his speeches with a desperate voice, which turns to anger towards Shylock when he starts taking his time and mocking with him over his decision. Shylock's opening sentences of act 1 scene 3 should be spoken in a slightly bewildered way.

  2. The Merchant of Venice.

    and are at risk from pirates and "the peril of waters, winds, and rocks" (Lines 12-28).Shylock when asked to dine with Antonio, significantly refuses, explaining that while he will do business with Antonio, walk, buy, sell and talk with him, he will not drink, dine or pray (Shylock is Jewish, Antonio is Christian)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work