• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The pilgrims summarise the noblest ideals and the basest practises" Discuss this statement.

Extracts from this document...


"The pilgrims summarise the noblest ideals and the basest practises" Discuss this statement. The prologue to the Canterbury Tales contains portraits of a multitude of characters, from the most pious to the downright wicked as Chaucer presents characters from all walks of life. His tales are a mixture of the noble, such as the Knight, the Parson and the Plowman who are juxtaposed with the ignoble Friar, Summoner and Pardonner. By interspersing this dichotomy of characters with a wealth of more 'in-between' ones Chaucer presents us with a refreshingly original mixture of humanity. The Knight is the first of Chaucer's pilgrims and therefore becomes the character against whom subsequent pilgrims will be compared and found to be flawed. It is fitting that it is he who is described first as he is the character of highest status on this particular pilgrimage . The Knight is an ideal character, a defender of the faith, courageous, modest "and though that he were worthy, he was wise/ And of his post as meeke as is a maide." Despite being a warrior he is meek bowing to his religious calling. Chaucer, in his satirical way, ensures that we are aware that being a knight is synonymous with being worthy as he uses the word to describe him no less that four times. It is through his belief in the five knightly values "chivalrie, trouthe, and honour, freedom and courtesie" that the Knight gains this accolade as chivalry, with its rules and obligations were forefront in the medieval mind. ...read more.


In reality such men are as rare as saints but their ideals are readily accepted. All three characters serve as the measuring stick for other pilgrims who more often than not fall short of these flawless standards. There are, however, some characters so low and repugnant that they represent the dichotomy of these faultless men. Three such characters include the Friar, the Pardonner and the Summoner, who are bound together by their immorality and abhorrent lifestyles. The Pardonner and the Summoner are the last two portraits in the prologue and perhaps two of the most interesting. They appear to be not only partners in work but also in a homosexual relationship. The bond is strong and they are open about their affections; on the journey they sing a love song together, and rather loudly too! "Ful loude he soong 'come hider, love to me!/ this the Summoner bar to him a stif burdoun." They are both quite similar in their visage, both being relatively ugly, and yet at the same time they have something about them of the fascination of the incongruous in children's fairy tales. A Summoner was a person appointed to bring the ecclesiastical courts to those who transgressed against the laws of the church. The position offered many chances for corruption and abuse of power, and we see that this Summoner readily indulges in doing so. ...read more.


Unlike any other of the clergy, there is a fundamental evil at he core of the Friar, which is made worse by his ability to disguise it. Perhaps the most incriminating indictment of the Friar's practices and even of the Friar himself can be found in these lines: "It is nat honeste, it may nat avaunce, For to deelen with no swich poraille, But al with riche and selleres of vitaille. And over al, ther as profit sholde arise, Curteis he was, and lowely of servyse. Ther nas no man nowher so virtuous" This extract demonstrates well Chaucer's irony. He shows us that the Friar despises the poor, they are simply rabble to him despite the fact that it is to these very people he should devote himself. This hubristic side of the Friar is well hidden however, especially if there is a chance to make money. In this telling portrait Chaucer appears artless, never sure of the connotations of his words. The na�ve manner of the narrator, however, only highlights the repugnant nature of the Friar and ignites a sense of disgust in the reader. Through these six characters Chaucer presents the twin dichotomies of the noblest ideals and basest practices; they are the embodiment of good and evil. In fact their personalities are so extreme that they are closer to the abstract personification of their own ideals, as found in morality plays, that they are real people and thus despite their truly cunning creation they lose a sense of humanity. 1 Girles meaning both young men and women ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer essays

  1. Discuss the sense of isolation and helplessness in ‘The Devils Carousel’ and ‘The Restraint ...

    Likewise even after Curly Brogan fakes his death it only leads him to "(slip) back into his old routine" illustrating the lack of consequence for his personal actions no matter how dramatic they are. To the employees the Centaur car company and their work is their life despite their self deceptive convictions that they despise work.

  2. Remind yourself of the portrait of the Franklin and his prologue and discuss the ...

    Chaucer allows the Franklin to have a good knowledge of the spoken language of the time and this is made evident within the prologue, showing he is eloquent, poetic and well spoken by his use of interpretatio "colours ne knowe I none...but swiche colours are growen" when he says the

  1. How do the Canterbury Tales explore the idea of gender? Discuss with reference to ...

    tales for entertainment purpose rather than a critical satire or romantic tale. Chaucer deliberately uses the Miller and his low brow tale to disrupt the natural social order (The Monk should have followed the Knight with his tale.) and fittingly the Miller shows little of the knowledge that is afforded to his fellow pilgrims.

  2. Merchant; Franklin; Sergeant of the Law. For each of these characters analyse how Chaucer ...

    The Franklin is a landowning man who needs not to work for his money. More than that, he is the only one of the three on whom the question is based who Chaucer seems to regard with any actual opinion.

  1. How do the Canterbury Tales represent female desires?

    However it is Jenkin that she loves the most. However he is violent and treats her with great disrespect. This is the first suggestion of misogyny. Is it true that women are so fickle to love most what they cannot easily attain?

  2. Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's General Prologue' and show ...

    But unlike the Knight, the Wife of Bath enjoys things that will fulfil her needs and wants, whereas the Knight's interests and pastimes directly benefit other people such as the Squire, his country or his King The Monk enjoys hunting, which could imply that he doesn't care about God's creatures as a Monk should.

  1. Compare and contrast the presentation of three pilgrims from Chaucer's 'General Prologue' and show ...

    The Monk is "a lord ful fat and in good poynt" which suggests that he is indulgent which is exactly the opposite of what a monk should be. The "sleves purfiled at the hond /with grys, and that the fyneste of a lond".

  2. Creative writing - The Disappearance.

    Surely he couldn't be blamed for raising his voice at those times (though never so much to wake his son) or for grabbing her by the elbow and pulling her to the bed, like he did the night before she disappeared.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work