The prologue calls Romeo and Juliet 'a pair of star crossed lovers' To what extent do you think fate is to blame for the tragedy?

Authors Avatar

Samantha Bennett

English

The prologue calls Romeo and Juliet ‘a pair of star crossed lovers’ To what extent do you think fate is to blame for the tragedy?

Before starting to decide to what extent fate was responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, I should first decide what is fate? According to the dictionary, fate is the ‘inevitable destiny or necessity destined term of life; doom.’ This basically means, that fate can be described as a pre-planned sequence of events influencing ones life. In Romeo and Juliet, it is obviously true to say that fate was a contributor to the deaths of the young couple, but could it have been the sole contributor?

 

From the beginning of the play it is clear that Romeo and Juliet are doomed to die, They are considered victims of circumstance but the question is did they have responsibility for their fate? Could things have been different? Was it a bad series of events, was it a coincidence that fate was against them, were outside forces against them, It is not just a coincidence the language used in the prologue ‘star-crossed lovers’ and ‘death-marked love’ shows that it was all meant to happen from the beginning of the play, the words ‘star-crossed’ refers to an astrological outlook on destiny that was widely accepted in the period the play was written in, reference to this so early in the play creates a sense of anticipation for the audience and from the start they know what is going to be the outcome of the play but the question left on their minds is ‘Why?’ and ‘How?’ these are answered as the play progresses. There were many outside forces against them a main one being characters in the play who intensely manipulated  the tragic path of Romeo and Juliet, these characters being apart from Romeo and Juliet themselves, Mercutio, The Nurse, Tybalt and The Friar.

Mercutio, being one of Romeos friends, is very influential in the decisions he makes he was a firm supporter of the Montague household and it was him who encouraged Romeo to attend the Capulet families gathering where he met Juliet, if Romeo had not attended he would have never met Juliet and the couples deaths would have been avoided. But was it Romeos destiny to meet Juliet would he if not through the dance met Juliet some other way? It was again Mercutio’s doing that Tybalt was killed; Romeo would have never murdered Tybalt if Mercutio had not taunted him in the street and therefore Romeo would have never been banished, but then again was it Romeos destiny to be exiled?

Join now!

The Nurse was a very influential character towards Juliet, Juliet trusted her nurse and seemed more of a mother figure to her, The Nurse acting for what she thought the best for Juliet went behind her lord and ladies back to be a messenger for Juliet to Romeo, without the Nurses help the marriage would have probably never taken place, but then again this is not a certain option and it is possible that even without the nurses help the doomed marriage still may have gone ahead and they would have once again met the same ending.

Tybalt, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay