The Purpose Of Education
The purpose of education has been discussed and written about by educators and scholars since Plato. "Education is an ornament in prosperity and a refuge in adversity", (Aristotle).Education has been used for everything and to justify everything. It has been used as a platform to elect from a president, to a garage collector. Religions have tried to control it and Anarchists have tried to destroy it. Some of the stated purposes have been to segregate, emancipate, integrate, and cultivate civic responsibility. The only thing scholars seem to agree on is that there is no agreement on its purpose. Much has depended on what period of time, political party, state of war, social or ethic group looking at the problem. Everyone seems to bring his or her own values and baggage to the discussion. Prospective seems to be the overriding influence on what controls the early part of children's lives.
One of the commonest areas of disagreement among educational theorists concerns what education should be for. Two broad divisions of opinion can be identified. They are, first, that education should serve the needs of the individual and second, that it should serve the needs of society. In industrialized nations it is common for both of these goals to be held but for different classes of the population. For the elite, the needs of the individual tend to prevail, and thus upper-class schooling often tolerates diversity and encourages idiosyncrasy. For the masses, the needs of society tend to dominate, and schooling usually serves to prepare children to become obedient, well-drilled, uncomplaining workers in industry and agriculture. In addition to this dichotomy, there are many national and cultural variations. In France and Germany, for example, there is a strong tendency to see the primary purpose of education as some form of intellectual development.
The purpose of education has been discussed and written about by educators and scholars since Plato. "Education is an ornament in prosperity and a refuge in adversity", (Aristotle).Education has been used for everything and to justify everything. It has been used as a platform to elect from a president, to a garage collector. Religions have tried to control it and Anarchists have tried to destroy it. Some of the stated purposes have been to segregate, emancipate, integrate, and cultivate civic responsibility. The only thing scholars seem to agree on is that there is no agreement on its purpose. Much has depended on what period of time, political party, state of war, social or ethic group looking at the problem. Everyone seems to bring his or her own values and baggage to the discussion. Prospective seems to be the overriding influence on what controls the early part of children's lives.
One of the commonest areas of disagreement among educational theorists concerns what education should be for. Two broad divisions of opinion can be identified. They are, first, that education should serve the needs of the individual and second, that it should serve the needs of society. In industrialized nations it is common for both of these goals to be held but for different classes of the population. For the elite, the needs of the individual tend to prevail, and thus upper-class schooling often tolerates diversity and encourages idiosyncrasy. For the masses, the needs of society tend to dominate, and schooling usually serves to prepare children to become obedient, well-drilled, uncomplaining workers in industry and agriculture. In addition to this dichotomy, there are many national and cultural variations. In France and Germany, for example, there is a strong tendency to see the primary purpose of education as some form of intellectual development.