The Snake Stone Critical Evaluation

Authors Avatar

The Snake Stone

Task: Sometimes books make the reader consider issues that he/she would not normally think about. From your reading of ‘The Snake Stone’ show how the author has achieved this. You should refer to setting, plot, characterisation and style in your response.

        A book which I have read recently is called ‘The Snake Stone’ written by Berlie Doherty. The story is written from two perspectives, one being that of a fifteen year old boy name James and the other being that of his mother, Elizabeth, fifteen years previous. The story is mainly set in a town in Central England, but at various points is set in Hollygate. The main characters are James and his mother Elizabeth,

        The story is about James, who lives with his adoptive parents, but he then decides he wants to track down his real mother. The only things which he has which could help him to the whereabouts of his mother are a stone and a torn envelope stating half of an address. Nobody has any clues as to who his mother could be but they are sure that she was a teenage mother. James was left as a newborn baby in a mailbox outside someone’s house with a stone and envelope. James checks maps and soon discovers that his place

Join now!

        An example which creates a vivid image is when describing the of birth has to have been in a place called Hollygate. James is supposed to be travelling down to London to practice his hobby diving with a very professional coach. Although James decides to make a detour on the road down – he gets the train to Hollygate. When he arrives there he thinks he has found his mother but he is mistaken, this was the place that James was found as a baby, after speaking with the woman who took care of him for a short amount of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

The second half of this essay is stronger as this is where specific analysis takes place. The first half of the essay spends too much time simply recalling the story which is unnecessary. Focus more on analysing throughout. 3 Stars