The story begins at 221B Baker Street, the residence of the great detective and his sidekick narrator, Dr. John Watson ““My dear fellow” said Holmes, as we sat either side of the fire in his lodgings at Baker Street”. Holmes astounds Watson ,with some amazing act of deduction or clear thinking that seems almost like magic. Soon, there is a knock on the door or the message of a visiting soon to be client with a problem, or a letter or telegram arrives pleading for help, or a newspaper article that Holmes or Watson is reading prompts Holmes to go and investigate. ““A fire?” “No it seems there is a young lady in quite a state”. Shortly thereafter, "The Game is Afoot!" as Holmes say. Holmes and Watson travel to the scene of the crime, either by walking or -- more usually -- via hansom cab if the crime is in London, or by train if it is out "in the country" somewhere. “At Waterloo we were at fortune to catch the train to Leatherhead”. Holmes investigates the clues in his incomparable and scientific fashion. like Watson we are there to observe the findings, but we do not add things up like the great detective does. Others often use disguise, especially by Holmes, but occasionally. “I shall dress in disguised garments”.. The "official police” are not a match for Holmes. The case is solved, often with a surprising twist. “Case of Identitiy”. Holmes, in a sort of epilogue, offers up the reason of his solution.
Detective story tends to be this puzzle sort of plot-at least on with this basic pattern, Arthur Conan Doyle was able to achieve great variety in actual story plots and "problems to be solved." The Poe-Doyle/Classic one level. The reader matches wits against the detective (actually the author), and each story is enjoyed as a kind of contest; sort of like the game of cludeo. Where the horror story seeks to fear, the detective story usually seeks to bring out a intellectual or logical-rational one.
Conan Doyle varies this structure by altering the elements of justice in all the stories. In the majority of typical detective stories you envision the villain to be caught a justice to be solved by imprisonment or to the court of law. But Sherlock Holmes is not an official police officer so this means of law justification. For example in “The speckled band” the villain is caught a dies from his own weapon an evil ways. Sherlock Holmes does not serve Justice but to the reader it seems to be a reasonable punishment for his crimes. An in “ The Beryl Coronet” Holmes lets the villain off with a caution, but is the justice?
In some ways the punishment of the guilty villain lays out side the law; Sherlock Holmes is the judge that decides that punishment.
The villains in the Holmes stories differ in each story. The classic villain or bad guy would be large in figure; greater than average strength; and with some type facial disfigurement. That Grimesby Roylott is quite a character. He killed a man and served hard time for it. He abused his stepdaughters physically, and possibly sexually as well. We never doubt that he killed Julia Stoner, even if at first we don't know how he managed it. His neighbours hated and feared him. In the “Speckled Band” we see a man “So tall” that his touches the ceiling of the room. “Seared with a thousand wrinkles, burned yellow with every evil passion” and a “high thin fleshless nose”. This is not only a typical villain of the detective genre but of most stories written. He has “evil blood shot eyes”; the reader would observe this man and sense that he is stronger than Holmes; he is tremendously intimidating. For instance the way he bends the poker” into a curve with his huge brown hands”; Conan Doyle depicts Dr.Roylot as a physically powerful, more so than the hero Mr.Holmes.But Doyle then reveals Holmes with a “grip not much as feeble as” Holmes. Doyle is present ting Holmes with a new quality. Not merely is Sherlock Holmes master of deception and extremely, he has the muscle to match a large “evil” man. This is a key element in many stories of this genre; where the hero has a superior human quality.
In the 5 orange pips we don’t get to observe the villains of the story; this deepens an area of mystery. The reader would most likely envision the villain as the typical bad guy villain; large figure; threatening features i.e. voice, face and strength. . Even granting that the details of the case are "singular" and Openshaw's account of the pips is interesting; Watson himself blind to the unfavourable portrait he gave us of Holmes. Holmes went into some detail about how "the ideal reasoned" could solve problems "in the study" without seeing the situation at first hand. Unthinking the unthinkable .I think that the reader cannot accept the fact that there hero Sherlock Holmes could have made such an error in judgment as the one that led to John Openshaw's death.. But the outcome of "The Five Orange Pips" is unlikely. Under normal circumstances, we think under certain basic assumptions when we consider the adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
!"
In another story “Case Of Identity” Doyle shows the villain as somebody close to the client. As the criminal is the father of the client “Miss Sunderland”. This is a astonishing element to the story; we aspect the villain to be some so0me outside o the family especially not in the close family like “James Windibank”.She's good-natured, a bit common, and not exactly the brightest gas-lamp on the street. The reader feels sorry for her, and is as outraged at her stepfather's duplicity as we are frustrated with her failure to see through his disguise.the two things that the reader wonders about in "A Case of Identity":isHow could Mary Sutherland be fooled by her stepfather's disguise and why didn't Holmes tell her the truth about Hosmer Angel?. Was Windibank secretly attracted to Mary all along so he just married her? If so, then why didn't he marry her in the first place, instead of her mother? Or is Windibank just a greedy and selfish fool, who concocted what seemed a harmless way to keep Mary and her income at home for a bit longer?
In all , the stories written by Conan Doyle are an intelligent fictional series .I some times thought that Doyle would have had to of been an gifted man or of known something about detective work to write such an intricate set of stories. Which show ruthless clever villains and Sherlock Holmes who powers of observation baffle any one who reads into it .
