"Things are breaking up. I don't understand why." (Ralph)- Explain how and why things are falling apart. To what extent is Ralph responsible? Ch.1-5

Authors Avatar

Claire Knapp, 10e

“Things are breaking up. I don’t understand why.” (Ralph)- Explain how and why things are falling apart. To what extent is Ralph responsible? Ch.1-5

The Lord of the Flies, William Golding, is about a group of boys who ended up stranded on a deserted island after a dangerous plane crash in which all adults died. The boys start off as innocent schoolboys you would expect to find in the 1940’s, but quickly descend into savages. This deterioration is the cause of various events and I am writing this essay to explain how and why things are falling apart and how it could be said that Ralph is to blame.

The Lord of the Flies is an allegory and a parody of the novel ‘Coral Island’. William Golding cleverly uses the island metaphorically, making the island a microcosm and the novel a story of humanity.

The first sign of things falling apart is early in chapter 1 when Ralph tells the group Piggy’s name. This breaks a simple rule in the ordinary world of grown-ups, as he breaks a promise. Already rules are being forgotten. By doing this he makes a close group of friends from all boys but leaves Piggy out, “…the boys were a closed circuit of sympathy with Piggy outside.”

A little later Ralph gives power to Jack “the choir belongs to you, of course.” He does this to keep the peace and make Jack content but by doing this he shows a weakness as a leader, vulnerability as a person and begins the power rivalry between himself and Jack. It is the same concept with giving a job to Piggy, although it keeps Piggy happy, it loses Ralph power, luckily Piggy is not so eager for the power as Jack.

Things can also be seen falling apart through the deterioration of language and clothes. In the first chapter the boys use very childish wards and phrases, such as “…like icing on a pink cake,” and “Wacco”. However, later in chapter 4, swear words like “Bloody,” and “Bollocks,” are used. This shows how they no longer abide by simple rules of language any more. It is the same perception with clothing. In chapter 1 the choir are especially smart and described with “…their bodies, from throat to ankle, were hidden by black cloaks…” Jack later on, in chapter 3, is described as “…except for a pair of tattered shorts…naked.”

Join now!

Another example of this theory is their long growing hair and the hunters painted faces. The hunters’ painting their faces is a massive leap into savagery. The ‘mask’ that Jack puts on his face is like a personality, which consumes Jack, as if the face paints are not just paints but a mind, a way of life. The book states “…his sinewy body, held up a mask that drew their eyes and appalled them,” and “the mask compelled them,” Their faces being painted shows a decrease in social stature.

A big deterioration is the newfound ability to kill a pig. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay