• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This excerpt is taken from the very first act of Shakespeare's play 'Richard III', and it exemplifies just how, throughout the play, Shakespeare portrays the king as a vile and despicable character.

Extracts from this document...


"Cheated of feature by dissembling Nature, Deform'd, unfinish'd, sent before my time Into this breathing world, scarce half made up And that so lamely and unfashionable That dogs bark at me as I halt by them; Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace, Have no delight to pass away the time, Unless to spy my shadow in the sun And descant on mine own deformity: And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover, To entertain these fair well-spoken days, I am determin'd to prove a villain And hate the idle pleasures of these days." This excerpt is taken from the very first act of Shakespeare's play 'Richard III', and it exemplifies just how, throughout the play, Shakespeare portrays the king as a vile and despicable character. This image of Richard has captured the imaginations of many and there is no doubt that he had been vilified and castigated across numerous generations: condemned as the evil villain who contrived to have his brother drowned in a butt of wine and his nephews smothered in the Tower of London. However, is this impression of King Richard really valid? Can this picture, painted in words by a man who wrote them over one hundred years after Richard's death, be the definitive account of the person and character of this frequently reviled king? To answer these questions one must look beyond Shakespeare's brilliantly written prose and search for true examples of Richard's personality. The Quest to ruin Richard's Name Though Shakespeare created the most vibrant images in his telling of Richard's life, his play can still only be viewed as fictional. It must also be taken into account that, though Shakespeare's characterization of Richard, as one of the most brutal and malicious of English kings, endured well past his death, it is a fact that his work is merely a continuation of the propaganda begun by Henry Tudor and his most devoted supporters after their victory at the Battle of Bosworth. ...read more.


and to his nephew Edward V as well, by arresting the Woodville conspirators, who had brought Edward V up and who wanted to rule through him when he was crowned. However, this could also be viewed as Richard's attempt to get rid of any opposition to his ensuing actions. Nonetheless Richard didn't appear to want the throne, since he began preparations for Edward V's coronation immediately and it all seemed set to take place. That is, until Robert Stillington, who was Chancellor twice during Edward IV's reign, brought the news that Edward V could not legally be crowned since Edward IV had be betrothed to another woman at the time that he married Elizabeth Woodville. This meant that all of Edward IV's children by Elizabeth were illegitimate since medieval church law held a consummated betrothal to be as legally binding as marriage. Since illegitimate children could not inherit Edward V could not be crowned. Hence the Lords and Commons of Parliament asked Richard if he would accept kingship of England; he did and on July 6th 1483 was crowned king of England. Whether these events are entirely true or not is questionable since Richard could have invented the claim that Edward V and Richard of York were illegitimate himself. Investigations have shown that the claim could have been put together, though it would have required much skill, and that the story was plausible, though not proved. There do seem to be elements of truth in Richard's accusation that make it feasible. For example, Edward IV was known to be a womanizer; therefore it is entirely possible that he was betrothed to another woman before marrying Elizabeth Woodville. Also, the man purported to have delivered the news, Robert Stillington, was Chancellor to Edward IV twice. Edward must have trusted the man for him to have gained that position. Hence Stillington would not unduly lie about the sons of the man who he served willingly, and thus one cannot really suspect Richard of forcing or bribing Stillington to say that Edward V and Richard were illegitimate. ...read more.


Earl of Northumberland when he visited a village near Thirsk; they had not forgotten how the Earl had refused to go to Richard's aid at the battle that claimed his life. Not a Hunchback, he was just Human In the face of these facts it is impossible not to be able see that Richard III was no where near as evil or malicious as has been made out. Josephine Toy's detective Alan Grant looked at Richard's portrait and saw "someone used to great responsibility, and responsible in his authority. Someone too conscientious. A worrier, perhaps a perfectionist." Not all of us will be able to view Richard in this way, but it is clear that the image that we all have all come to recognize from Shakespeare is merely an image of propaganda and does not truthfully represent Richard in character or in physical appearance. Perhaps Richard III was not perfect, but he does not deserve to be reviled as much as he has been. Even someone who does believe in the truth of physiognomy cannot simply jump to the conclusion that Richard was a murdering villain. Indeed, if he had been given the chance, it is quite likely that Richard would have grown upon all his people, making an impact on them just as he did on the people of York having ruled them for twelve years prior to becoming sovereign. In particular I find it extremely unfair that Richard has suffered such libel whilst other monarchs, such as Henry IV, who snatched the throne from his uncle Richard II and then had him murdered, and Henry VIII, who executed not one, but two of his wives in plain evidence, have managed to escape the censure that has been awarded to Richard III. Therefore, before you bear judgment on Richard, just think about all the evidence that has been put forward here and you will quickly realize that perhaps Richard deserves a lot more appreciation than we have been willing to give him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. How does Shakespeare represent female characters in Richard the third?

    This works and she shows that she is helpless when she is flattered by comments like...Line 49 act 1 scene 2 "Sweet saint [...] be not so curst." Here, Richard is deluding her whilst aiming at her weakness as he does with each of his victims in different ways.

  2. How does Richard change over the course of the play Richard III?

    This is a sign of commitment and Anne then leaves. Richard then faces the audience and reveals his true self with yet another soliloquy, drawing us in once again and reminding us of his plans." Will not keep her long" The audience doesn't sympathise with Anne as she was wooed so quickly by Richard and with false words.

  1. Discuss how the climatic scenes from Edward Scissorhands and Sleepy Hollow make use of ...

    Lighting is used by Tim Burton to create certain gothic moods within the film such as fear. It is also used to create uncertainty with shadows. Burton uses blue lighting a lot to create the gothic moods and nature of each film.

  2. How successfulwas Edward IV in restoring royal authority by 1470?

    has shown he is not willing to ignore law and order and let his nobility deal with it, but his actions have not had a great effect in practice. An obvious problem Edward faced was the Lancastrian opposition. In order to secure royal authority he had to secure power over the opposition.

  1. Does Richard the third deserve his reputation?

    murder although Richard is the main suspect, in writing this in his play Shakespeare has confirmed suspicions as he has put it in writing and anyone who reads it believes it was him. In history Richard the third reigned from 1483-1485.

  2. "Richard III has been called Shakespeare's greatest villain. Do you agree? Analyse two scenes ...

    During this conversation Clarence blames Edward but Richard says no it is not he, it is his wife Elizabeth who you should blame for this and the only way to survive in this monarchy is to be nice to the Queen.

  1. Is Richard III a hero or a villain

    Richard certainly does fit the bill of Machiavelli's ideal ruler. So does that make him a hero? Perhaps it does, but perhaps Machiavelli acknowledged that a good king shouldn't be a hero, but a tyrant instead. It seems likely that Shakespeare will have based his play on Machiavelli's work, thus

  2. Comment on the characters and behaviour of Edward Ferrars and John Willoughby in "Sense ...

    Edward and Willoughby have very different attitudes to money. Edward has an outlook on wealth which is different to many of the men in the Georgian era. Marrying for money and connections as Willoughby did was quite normal but to marry for love was virtually unheard of. We are told that Edward however does not want a wealthy lifestyle

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work