"Through Close Examination of Two Scenes, Comment on Shakespeare's use of Dramatic Irony, In Romeo and Juliet"

Authors Avatar

By Kate Naylor 10L

“Through Close Examination of Two Scenes,

Comment on Shakespeare’s use of Dramatic Irony,

In Romeo and Juliet”

I understand that the term, ‘Dramatic irony’ is the irony that occurs when a situation, or speech for instance, is fully understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play.

Shakespeare uses dramatic irony superbly throughout the play, because he leaves the audience in suspense and anticipation whilst leaving the theatre surrounded by tension. This is what I think makes the play a great tragedy because it makes us ask the question, “What if?” What if Romeo hadn’t been so hasty in love? What if he hadn’t let his emotions (especially rage) control him?

In the prologue, the chorus announces, “A pair of star-cross’d lovers take their life.” The audience is quick to figure out that he means Romeo and Juliet, but they wonder why Shakespeare has just declared the ending at the beginning of the play. I think this is because he is implying to the audience that fate has control over their lives and there is no way to interfere with what has been set for them. This also sets the scene and the audience can now see the play from a new perspective as what they know is revealed before them. What the audience know from the chorus now also plays with their emotions and reactions, as they know what will happen, but how? And when? This also causes more suspense and anticipation and lets them focus on less obvious parts of the play such as the language or actions of the characters.

Before the scenes I will be covering, Act 3 Scene 1 and Act 5 Scene III, we have seen a lot of conflict between the two houses, Romeo in ‘love’ with a lady named Rosaline whom we never see, and then the love-at-first-sight with Juliet, whom we know has been promised by her father to the nobleman and ideal husband County Paris, but she too has fallen in love with Romeo, a little reluctantly though as she is not sure that he could be faithful. Her worries could not have been very strong as they are wed at the end of Act II.

In Act 3 scene I, we see dramatic irony right from the start when the scene opens on Benvolio talking to Mercutio. Benvolio is saying that they should retire as, “The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, and if we meet, we shall not ’scape a brawl.” This is true and the audience knows it as one of the characters is soon to depart out of the play, but when? The audience may also acknowledge that this scene is an echo of Act 1 Scene 1 as a fight was within grasp, but Benvolio interfered and the fight did not commence. This time it is different as the shadow of death is hanging over one of the characters, grave and deadly.

Join now!

The audience is familiarised with more dramatic irony when Tybalt, a rival to the Montagues, shows up looking to fight with Romeo. We know that he will not as he has just bestowed his love to Juliet, cousin of Tybalt, so Romeo and Tybalt are now of kin and he will not fight. Romeo explains his reasons for not fighting, when he says, “I have to love thee.” Romeo must back down from this duel as he would be fighting his own family.

“This shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done me. Therefore turn and draw.” ...

This is a preview of the whole essay