• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU THINK SHELLY INTENDS US TO RESPOND TO THE CREATURE AS A 'MONSTER' We are first introduced to the creature when Frankenstein, his creator, is describing him. First he is described as something beautiful "limbs were in proportion" and "features were beautiful". However, his ability to self-contradict becomes apparent very quickly when he finishes his sentence by saying: "...These luxuriance's only form a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes..." With words like "shrivelled complexion" and "straight black lips", this gives the impression to the reader that firstly the creature does not look a human being and, secondly, he is hideous in Frankenstein's eyes. Also when the creature is bought to life the setting is "a dreary night of November", "rain pattered dismally against the pains" and his "candle was nearly burnt out". This pathetic fallacy sets an eerie stage and the reader can anticipate that something bad is about to happen, and can almost predict that the creature is going to be ominously different. The creature differs to humans in many ways. Firstly, his physical appearance is different; he is eight foot tall, "yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries" and shrivelled complexion and black lips. Secondly, his arrival into the world was by artificial means and not by conception and birth. ...read more.


These are acts of pure love and kindness. He is unmercenary in his motives and seeks no reward. A monster would not do these things and this shows his humane side. The way he reacts after he is rejected by the delacy family appears to be quite monsterous, but to be quite fair to the monster after the build up of so much tension and then to have your final hope so cruelly dashed, perhaps his reactions are not so surprising , maybe they may even be considered a natural human reaction. However, what is significant is Mary shelly's language, and her words that will eventually lead you to the impression as to what the creature is reallylike. When the creature burns the house down Mary shelly writes "...1 lighted the dry branch of a tree, and danced, with fury around the devoted cottage". This conjures up a very frightening image of the creature and he appears almost demonical it's as if he is carrying out a satanic ritual as he dances around the burning house, screaming. At the start of the creatures narrative, Mary uses language that makes us empathise with the creature and it would appear that he seems more human, then a deamon, she writes "......a strange multiplicity of sensations seize me" We are shown the creature's humane qualities. ...read more.


This is what happens to the people who lead the way in French Revolution. They too created a monster who grew out of control and eventually the leaders were executed. Frankenstein's creature begs to be treated with kindness and respect, but he is spurned and rejected. His moral monstrosity of the terror is also a creation of the French Aristocracy. If the Aristrocracy had acknowledged and paid gratitude and respect to the common people, they would of reciprocated in kind and the need for a revolution would be unnecessary. . Both the creature and his creator are warnings/demonstrations to the world: the powerful must esteem and respect the powerless, or revolution will ensue. Now I come to answer the question "does Shelly intend us to respond to the creature as a monster". What Mary Shelly is saying is that monsters aren't born they are made. This is evident in the way that the creature is treated. When he is first introduced to the world he is a kind, loving being, perhaps even an example of goodness. But when in the face of people he is rejected, cursed upon and unloved, this in effect turns the creature into a monster. Mary is also saying that reform, when it is controlled and in the right hands is not a bas thing, but when we fail to control it will grow uncontrollable and become evil. By Joshua Gray ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. Does Mary Shelly make us feel sorry for Frankenstein's monster?

    this was when the monster became speechless and tried to make up his mind in whether to tell the old man the truth and risk his happiness or not, just then the whole family returned from the woods and came into the house.

  2. Is Frankensteins creation is a creature or a monster?

    The words used make the creature seem like a monster at this point. She says 'it stole' out of 'the gloom' with its 'gigantic statue'. This makes the creature seem monstrous because he's murdered William and the words in this section all have a semantic field of darkness and fear.

  1. Relationship Between Frankestein and the Creature.

    Chapter five begins with 'it was a dreary night', which sets the tone for the rest of the chapter. This immediately tells the reader that all hasn't gone according to plan. The word dreary gives an impression of quite a lengthy but pointless attempt at something.

  2. To what extent is

    I entreat you to hear me before you give vent to your hatred on my devoted head" Here we see a total character switch and not something the reader would expect. Leading on from this language also plays a important role as the monster has to learn to read, rite

  1. To what extent are Frankenstein and his creature evil?

    'I saw how the worm inherited the wonders of the eye and the brain'. He picked up bits of body by going around charnel houses and grave digging for his eight-foot creature. In my opinion, as the story goes on, Victor Frankenstein is becoming conceited but I think he has

  2. Do you think Mary Shelly makes the reader fear or sympathize with the creature ...

    Frankenstein then goes on to describe the creature and wonder how he could ever have thought of the creature as wonderful or beautiful. None of the features that the creature has should be classed as beautiful as they are just hideous to even think about, let alone see as Frankenstein

  1. In your view, how do you think that Mary Shelleywanted her readers to respond ...

    This makes Frankenstein a complex character. Hence, the following arguments; The character of Frankenstein seems to have been written as quite an ambiguous character. Our emotive responses to him change throughout the novel; mostly on account of the changing narratives. The main emotions we seem to feel are - sympathy, anger and empathy.

  2. "Mary Shelly portrays the monster as a complex character for when we should feel ...

    despise the creature, concluded that the being is evil and that we should expect evil deeds to be committed from this creature. (2). It becomes a long unaware time before Victor memory of the creature is re-lighted, however the creature return is a memorable one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work