To what extent is Romeo a tragic hero?

Authors Avatar

To what extent is Romeo a tragic hero?

 

        The first tragedy plays were written and performed by the Athenians in Greece. During that time, gods and religion were very important in Athenians’ lives and so the plays usually revolved around stories about Gods and people of high status such as kings. In the play, ‘Romeo and Juliet’, the story revolves around Romeo and Juliet who are of high status as Romeo is the son of  “Montague” and Juliet is the daughter of “Capulets” who are “both alike in dignity.” This makes Romeo more of a tragic hero as the play is a tragedy. But his fall in life does not involve the fate of the whole nation as in many tragic plays so this could lessen Romeo being a tragic character as the play is lacks this feature of a tragic play.

        The language in tragedy plays is often dramatic and ‘Romeo and Juliet’ often has characters speaking dramatic language. Romeo’s language at the end of the play is very dramatic and he uses metaphors and makes death a “lean abhorrèd monster” that keeps Juliet “in the dark to be his paramour.” He makes death seem like a selfish thing, which takes Juliet’s life away from Romeo so that she can be its lover. This is a very dramatic and cruel metaphor for death that Romeo has used. Romeo says that the metaphorical death monster “hath sucked the honey” of Juliet’s “breath.” Romeo describes death as a “bitter conduct” for him, the use of sense of taste makes Juliet seem ‘sweet’ and innocent if her breath was like honey. This would also make him a tragic character.

        Another feature of a tragedy play is the increasing speed of events leading to the end of the play. ‘Romeo and Juliet’ does show this feature because Romeo and Juliet’s marriage, Mercutio’s death, Tybalt’s death and the death of Romeo and Juliet all happen in a short space of time; a couple of days. This supports the view of Romeo being a tragic character.

In many tragic plays, the main character or hero suffers from fate, Romeo does suffer from fate and you could say that fate may have led him to his death. There are many examples of fate that Romeo encounters, for example, he meets Capulet’s servant who gets Romeo to read the list of names of the invitation of the feast because he can’t read - “Pray, sir, can you read?” If the servant had not asked Romeo to read the list of people who were invited then he would not have known that Rosaline or Mercutio were to attend the feast. Romeo hints on his own ill fate, which is the ability to be able to read, “Mine own fortune in my misery.” This would probably make him want to go to the feast aswell to see Rosaline or to accompany Mercutio and thus increase the chance of him meeting Juliet.

It is also fate that Mercutio persuades Romeo to go to the feast. “ If love be rough with you, be rough with love” Mercutio tells him to forget about his love sickness and go to have fun. Again, Romeo can sense his that the attendance at the feast will lead to his fate “I fear too early, for my mind misgives/ Some consequence yet hanging in the stars/ Shall bitterly begin his fearful date.”

I would also consider it fate when Capulet does not let Tybalt throw him out of the feast otherwise Romeo would not have known Juliet that well and may not fall in love with her. “I would not for wealth of all this town / Here in my house do him disparagement”. Capulet has heard that Romeo is “a virtuous and well-governed youth.” and also uses that reason to discourage Tybalt from fighting Romeo. You could say that this makes Romeo more of a hero as other characters admire him. The feature of fate in this play makes it more tragic and Romeo more of a tragic character too.

But Lady Capulet contradicts her husband’s compliment of Romeo by saying “he speaks not true” and that he and his men are poor fighters against Tybalt-“All those twenty could but kill one life.” These negative comments about Romeo make him seem unheroic and perhaps make Tybalt the heroic one because he fought so many men alone.

But we have to remember that Lady Capulet made this comment about her nephew when he was just killed by Romeo, so it may be biased against Romeo because she does not like Montague and also that he just killed Tybalt.

I have analysed Tybalt’s behaviour in general and I can see that Lady Capulet is being biased against Romeo. Tybalt’s attitude towards Montague is very unmerciful, he seizes every chance to fight with Romeo hoping to kill him; he does not even forgive Romeo because he went to the Capulet’s party without an invitation “It fits when such villain is a guest: / I’ll not endure him.” Tybalt has also contributed to the tragedy of the play because he was the one who started the fight with Romeo and his death had banished Romeo, who in the end kills himself because he is apart from his wife. You could say that this unforgiving nature of Tybalt makes him seem like a villain of the play and Romeo the hero or peacemaker.

Join now!

You could also say that Romeo is a peacemaker because he is a friend of Benvolio who has a very peaceful nature. Benvolio always tries to stop the fights between the two families “ Either withdraw unto some private place.” and it was he, who Romeo commanded to stop Mercutio and Tybalt from fighting “Draw, Benvolio, beat down their weapons.”

Towards the end of the play, Romeo suffers a reversal of fortune like many tragic heroes. He is really happy “if the measure of thy joy be heaped like mine” when he marries Juliet  “holy Church incorporate two in one.” ...

This is a preview of the whole essay