• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what Extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an attack on the American Society of the 1950's?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what Extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an attack on the American Society of the 1950's? Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953 during the McCarthy period when Americans were accusing each other of Pro-Communist beliefs. His purpose through writing 'The Crucible' was to express his own views on McCarthyism, and he does this through the main plot, the 17th century Salem witch hunt, which is an allegory of the trials during the McCarthy period. At the end of the play, the two most noble and honest characters are killed, and this is an exact replica of what was happening in America during the 1950s. The setting of Act 3 can be understood as an attack on the severity of the authorities in Salem and 1950's America. The language used in the opening stage directions is negative and disheartening, "solemn" creating an unwanted feeling throughout the audience, almost as if they are not meant to be there; 'even forbidding'. We are told that 'sunlight (is) pouring through two high windows' but is being swallowed by the darkness beneath. In the play, these stage directions can be understood as the light being Giles and John Proctor, who tell the truth, but Danforth, the darkness beneath, is hiding the truth. ...read more.

Middle

Abigail's dramatic entry, right at the climax of the scene, has a negative effect on the audience, as they already have an idea of how evil she is, and the extent to which she will go to get what she wants. She manipulates the mind of Danforth, who she is able to overpower, making him very uneasy at times, and shows him to be "weakening", he asks questions "apprehensively", and at times is "dumbfounded". This is because Abigail is the only way he can prove that he is in the right, and that years of studies have not gone to waste. By making Danforth's character so weak, Miller is condemning the fact that McCarthy is a weak man who has a closed mind over the things he says and does. The language throughout the whole scene is very extreme, 'Whore', for an extreme, negative effect on the audience. Mary is shown to be 'pleading' with Abigail and this shows the extent o fear in the people of Salem and in America in the 1950s. Mary Warren is unable to faint when asked to, and this immediately creates tension in the audience, as they, most probably, would want her to faint in order to save Proctor and Elizabeth. Her inability to faint only strengthens Abigail's case, and this would only strengthen what Danforth stands for. ...read more.

Conclusion

This has a negative effect on the audience, as they appreciate the injustice of McCarthy, and how the people were not doing anything to save anyone. The Crucible on a whole is a single issue play. The main plot evolves around the main characters of the play, and the other characters seem to be props to fill in the missing spaces. It is for this reason that the play lacks subtlety in both the plot and the characters, and why John Proctor is made to be the main character of the play, the only believable character that we can identify with. Having considered the dramatic nature of this scene, I believe that it criticises McCarthyism and is an attack on the American society of the 1950's. Miller does this by repeatedly showing the Salem citizens as ignorant and unintelligent. He attacks Danforth time and time again, showing him to be weak, and yet he is able to have power over the people, only because of the fact that he has higher authority then they have. The innocent characters are the ones who are killed, and the guilty characters are the ones who get away with their crimes. This highlights the very point that during 1950's America, there was no justice whatsoever, and the only people who ruled were those who were able to put fear into the hearts of others. ?? ?? ?? ?? Naaila Haq English Coursework 10g1 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Arthur Miller was inspired to write The Crucible because of what happened in America ...

    The play states, " He (Rev Parris) was a widower with no interest, or talent with them." Consequently it is easy to see that Abigail received no love or attention. As a result of this she couldn't look up to a real father figuire. Abigail William's obsession with John Proctor affects the play very greatly.

  2. How successful is The Crucible as an allegory?

    On pages 74 - 75 John Proctor says: Proctor: Now Hell and Heaven grapple on our backs, and all our old pretence is ripped away. This not only shows how Miller has employed personification and religious imagery to show hysteria but it also shows the contrast between Heaven and Hell, white against black.

  1. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    At the beginning of Act One, Abigail and Proctor accidentally meet when he enters Parris's home. When they are alone, the words they exchange with each other illustrate clearly the structure of their relationship. Miller makes it evident to his audience from the start of this scene that Abigail's feelings for Proctor are much stronger than his feelings for her.

  2. To what extent can 'The Crucible' be viewed as a Classical Tragedy?

    In a classical tragedy the central character is of noble or royal birth, but the protagonist of 'The Crucible', John Proctor, is a common farmer. In the dictionary 'noble' has two meanings: the first being a person of noble/illustrious birth, this cannot be applied to Proctor as he is a simple farmer with negligible birth and rank.

  1. The Crucible Coursework by Arthur Miller

    The second thing that the audience would be thinking is that they could be slightly confused, of why there is a large table on stage with small stools and then a large chair. This could stand of a meaning of that someone important is going to sit in that specific chair.

  2. There is a clear parallel between the events of 1692 in Salem and the ...

    guilty such was the hysteria of the trials and the terror people were under. In both trials the accusations were unsupported and had little or no proof that the people were guilty.

  1. Focusing on Act 3, to what extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an ...

    Again this an attack on the elements of society because it shows that the court was a place where people weren't treated fairly in the 1950's and that the authorities in America were harsh and wanted people to get into all sorts of problems and trouble and this is what

  2. The Crucible - summary.

    Parris tells Danforth that he never found anybody naked, but admits to finding them dancing. Parris demands that Mary Warren pretend to faint as she had done before, but she cannot, for she has no sense of it; she once thought she saw spirits, but now she does not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work