• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Victor Frankenstein is a morally reprehensive character. Discuss this with reference to the following chapters: 4, 5, 10, 11, 17 and 24.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Victor Frankenstein is a morally reprehensive character. Discuss this with reference to the following chapters: 4, 5, 10, 11, 17 and 24. Frankenstein is a book written by Mary Shelley in the 19th century, in the new gothic genre. At the time when it was published, it was a very controversial book, raising many moral issues that were seldom talked about at that time. In this essay I will be trying to find out if Victor Frankenstein is morally reprehensible. The title implies that the whole of Victor Frankenstein's character is immorally blameworthy. This is a narrow-minded statement, as it allows no room for argument. For example, only certain aspects of Victor Frankenstein's character could have been seen as immoral. If Frankenstein is morally reprehensive, it means that he knows he is responsible for the events that take place and accepts the responsibility. It is not possible for someone to stay in the same frame of mind for their whole life, so the title is too definitive a statement. It suggests that the whole of Victor Frankenstein, past, present and future, is completely immoral and there are no means of changing this. People are not only of one point of view the whole time; they react differently in different situations and also change with time. People can be regretful one time, then completely fine the next, I think this is what Victor Frankenstein is like throughout the book. If Frankenstein was morally reprehensive as the title suggests, his crime would not be creating the monster as he could have taught him to do great things with his strength and intelligence. ...read more.

Middle

As he decides to create the monster, he has no idea that there could possibly be anything wrong with what he's doing. The reader, living in a modern world where cloning is more acceptable, thinks that he should have been more responsible and thought about his action more before he creates the creature. However, the reader needs to think back to when the book was set and remember that Frankenstein had never experienced any examples of genetic engineering, as it wasn't something that was done in the 19th century. He truly believed that his creation would love him as it's creator, and that it would lead to major breakthroughs in the future of science, not realising that the outcome could be more terrible than he could imagine. He was so sure it was meant to be for him to create the monster, 'destiny was too potent and her immutable laws had decreed my utter and terrible destruction'. But during the creation process, Frankenstein becomes obsessed with his work. So obsessed infact, that he forgets about his family and doesn't write to them for two years. This could cause the audience to blame him for the creature's sins, as what he did to create the monster was such a disgrace. He ignores his family and friends, and cut up dead bodies, 'I shunned my fellow creatures as if I was guilty of a crime'. Frankenstein shows a certain amount of responsibility further on in the book when he follows the monster to the North Pole. His intention is to kill him, though he has nothing left that the monster could take away from him. ...read more.

Conclusion

He did so much research into natural philosophy and he should have realised from his study that he needed to learn from other people's experiences. His obsession with being the first got in the way of him thinking straight. I think Frankenstein leaving the monster to fend for himself was also morally wrong. All human beings are cared for once they are born, so leaving the monster alone is suggesting that he isn't human and doesn't deserve to be treated as one. As the creature was often out in the open, this gave him a chance to be shunned and discriminated against by society which introduced the feelings of hatred and aggression which were used later on to destroy Frankenstein's happiness. Frankenstein is really responsible, because if he were not so obsessed with natural philosophy and the death of his mother, he would never have developed a passion for saving life and would never have discovered that creating life was possible. He only had himself to blame for the destruction caused by the creature; not only to himself but to those he loved. Frankenstein never really admitted the responsibility, he said that God gave him the power, 'I found such astonishing power placed upon my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it' and though he did take a long time to think about what to do, he reached never realised the full outcome of his decision. Although he realised his mistake at the end, and tried to put someone off making the same one, he never admitted the responsibility out loud. So, in conclusion to the title, I'd say that Victor Frankenstein is a very morally reprehensible character. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare the two books Frankenstein and Jurassic Park and pay particular attention to the ...

    4 star(s)

    In Frankenstein there is frequent use of simile for example; "I appeared rather like one doomed by slavery," That line is used in the book when Frankenstein was telling the reader about how hard he was working on his creation and how its almost how he has to, like a slave.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare the two chapters which describe the creation of Frankenstein(TM)s monster.

    4 star(s)

    One could be that from a psychological point of view. Frankenstein could be referred to as a psychological tale as people in those days continued to push themselves into achieving their ambitions: against the run of reality. Captain Walton could be used as the character that does this.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Explain how Mary Shelley Develops the Gothic Genre in chapter 4 and 5 of ...

    3 star(s)

    simply takes the parts that he needs and leaves the rest to rot. Also the fact that he is torturing animals seems cruel. Another revolting part is the dissecting room "The dissecting room and the slaughter house furnished many of my materials" the fact that he has a room where

  2. 'Frankenstein and the monster are often confused', Discuss the parallels between Frankenstein and his ...

    This can be seen not only with violence but in every aspect of their personality. When they have their minds set on something, they continue even if they have had experience that tells them they are wrong. The monster regretted torturing Frankenstein at the end of the novel, and so

  1. 'Frankenstein Essay' - With reference to chapters 11-16, trace the development and change in ...

    He is shocked by the shepherd's disgusted reaction and cannot understand why he fled and why he didn't seem to be welcome in the hut. The monster becomes enchanted by the appearance of the hut (owned by the fleeing shepherd)

  2. How is the creature presented in chapters 11-16 of Frankenstein?

    Like a newborn baby, it takes the creature time to develop his understanding. Unlike a baby, he has no-one to help him or to care for him. Then we see him learning through trial and error. When he discovers a fire he is "overcome delight at the warmth I experienced

  1. Compare three stories of suspense in three different styles of writing

    Frankenstein and the man in "The Raven" are quite similar in the fact that they are both mentally affected by what they have been through in the story. The only character with an evident history is Frankenstein. This is because the story of "Frankenstein" is a novel and novels supply many details concerning the history of events, plots and characters.

  2. Comparison of "Frankenstein" (Pre-1900) and "Jurassic Park" (Pro-1900)

    Whereas his creation writes about how he thinks he is an outcast in society and find it hard to survive. This is good for the reader as it broadens the issues in the book and makes the reader understand each mans view.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work