Violent Scenes in "Romeo and Juliet"

Authors Avatar

Hannah Winter

Violent Scenes in “Romeo and Juliet”

  “Romeo and Juliet” is a tragedy about two young people, blinded by their love for one another.  Throughout the play violence is contrasted with the passionate love between Romeo and Juliet.  The play both opens and ends with violent scenes, caused by the on going feud between two families – the Montagues and the Capulets.  This violence leads to the deaths of central characters whose deaths finally bring about reconciliation between the families.  In this essay I will discuss the theme the violent scenes and show how the conflict affects the characters and the action of the play.

  “Romeo and Juliet” was written by William Shakespeare and first performed in 1595. Set in the 16th century when Queen Elizabeth I ruled England it appealed to an audience that was Elizabethan.  Elizabethans liked watching exciting or violent plays.  Shakespeare makes his as exciting as possible in order to satisfy the audience and successfully keep them entertained.  “Romeo and Juliet” is a classic story of forbidden love, with scenes of high drama, violence and a tragic ending.  The violence throughout highlights the tendencies and warmth of the love story, which unfolds against this background.  

  The play opens with a brawl between members of the Capulet and Montague households, in a public place in Verona. A Capulet servant, Sampson, provokes Abram who responds.  The insult given is a typical one in Shakespeare’s day and shows that the violence of the feud affected all levels of society – even the servants of the feuding families fight.  Shakespeare may have used this scene to excite his audience and initially gain their interest while introducing many of the main characters in the play.

We meet Tybalt Capulet who draws the audience’s attention with his thirst for violence “…talk of peace?  I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee: Have at thee, coward.”  The audience becomes aware that the feud will be kept alive with his attitude.  Abram (a Montague servant) and Sampson start the fighting, which shows that Shakespeare wanted to emphasise how the violence permeates the whole of this society – even the servants fight. “I do bite my thumb, sir” was a very provocative insult in Shakespeare’s day, so Sampson knew how to start the fighting.  Benvolios efforts to stop the violence are futile.  All the males of this society join in – even Old Capulet and Lord Montague.  This hate filled society governed by male violence is not a place we might expect love to flourish.  

  Some local citizens, who are sick of both the Capulets and the Montagues, join in the riot.  Instead of stopping the violence, the head of each of the feuding families enters both wanting to join the fight.  Montague, flourishing his sword, was prevented by his wife who was holding him back.  As for Capulet, when he called for his sword, his wife replied sarcastically, “A crutch, a crutch! Why call you for a sword?”  Both show that the feud and accompanying violence is something which they feel necessary to take part in.  The arrival of Prince Escalus with his followers acting as riot police stops the riot.  The Prince tries to make himself heard.  Again we see how much part of Verona the violence is in the Prince’s speech.  “Rebellious subjects, enemies to peace, profaners of this neighbour-stained steel -”

Join now!

Only the supreme authority in the land can control the situation.  He warns both households “If ever you disturb our streets again, your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace.”

  The scene suggests that the conflict between war and peace is fundamental within man, and ends quietly emphasising this contrast.  The theme of love is introduced by Romeo.  Shakespeare carefully balances situations like this within scenes to engage his audience and present love against a background of conflict.

  Act 3, scene 1 opens with Benvolio and Mercutio in the streets of Verona.  It is a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay