Votes for women Q1&2

Authors Avatar

Yasmin Deane

11hv

History.

Votes for women

1900-1928

Source A, a 1912 poster which compares both sexes fit for the vote.

It implies that women can be highly educated as they to university to get a degree for teaching or study for 7 years to be a doctor who makes decisions life’s and save lives in everyday life and still not have the vote, when a man can be a lunatic and still be fit for the vote.

A convict also can have the vote even though he has committed a crime/offence, in prison he is still eligible for the vote when a female Mayor who has proven to others she can be sensible and reliable as having keys to the town/city and not make careless decisions and would care about her decision on having the vote.

A lunatic can not make decision for his-self as of a metal disorder, and who is unfit to be a member of the public when he can have the vote on what sex he is (male), when a mother for eg.4 has to make choices for her children and look after them and nature them and keep them away from danger, this gives evidence that women could be trusted and have responsibilities. While her husband is away at work earning the money mostly likely doing an equal jobs as of his wife.

Join now!

Suffragettes produced eye catching poster with information with her augment and of her frustration of not having the vote, when she can make a reasonable agreement peacefully and sensibly. A suffragette poster can explain and project there point of view and make history by doing so.

Overall women proved to society that they could be trusted and have responsibilities and make life/death decisions. The decisions its self for women to not have the vote is biased and sexist. Not based on individuals but based on the sexes and its pro claimed that men were higher than women ...

This is a preview of the whole essay