• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Richard III A Wicked Tyrant?

Extracts from this document...


WAS RICHARD III A WICKED TYRANT? Throughout history, this very title has been disputed and the outcome has remained debatable to this very day. Richard, Duke of York had remained loyal to his brother, Edward IV throughout his years of reign, and had been well rewarded for his support, he became the Duke of Gloucester. In marrying Anne Neville, daughter of Earl of Warwick, he had inherited mass amounts of Neville land in the north of England after both the Earl and Anne died. He was respected within the northern parts of England and provided land for his friends. He was an able man who showed signs of being an efficient king amidst the preoccupations of the rebellions, sadly he went about it the wrong way. ...read more.


He professed that he had been informed, by a Bishop, of how Edward had been betrothed to a woman by the name of Eleanor Boteles, before his marriage to Elizabeth in 1464. This therefore proved the marriage was invalid and the children were bastards. There was no evidence to contradict Richard, as both Edward and Eleanor were dead, she had died a number of years before the story came out. With all other claimants to the throne dead, Richard was the rightful heir. Richard's seizure of the throne could also be seen as ambitious, or overly ambitious, and this cost him support. On becoming king, he had shared southern land between his northern supporters, loosing all trust and loyalty from the south. ...read more.


This revolt collapsed, and Buckingham was executed. The very fact that Richard's closest allies were revolting against him was a clear indication that he would have to fight hard to hold onto the throne and his power. It is probably the suggestion that Richard was responsible for two boys murder that led to many leaving him and supporting the opposition of Henry Tudor who proved to be more than Richard was prepared for. In 1485, Henry landed in Wales, defeated and killed Richard in the battle of Bosworth Field, and ascended the throne. Despite his usurpation of the throne, Richard was not the total villain that tradition has made him, or how his evil reputation, immortalised by Shakespeare's Richard III was portrayed. Richard was the last of the Yorkist kings, and, in retrospect, his death ended the Wars of the Roses. Anna Remington SCM History (2) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. Does Richard the third deserve his reputation?

    not in the room but is very pleasant to the Queen when he is. I definitely believe that Richard does deserve the reputation he is given. Many people dislike him but all have good reasons. I also think Richard anticipated that he would not be liked by many when he started planning to seize the throne.

  2. Richard III - provide an exploration of how Shakespeare presents appearance and reality within ...

    Again, religion is manipulated to give a false identification of Richard. Their aim is to get Richard to become king and attain ruler ship thinking that they may get something in return. Buckingham's language reveals that he; Catesby and Richard are play acting.

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    Richard is clearly a villain - he declares this in the initial speech and that he intends to never stop until he has achieved his goal. But despite this evil, he is such a charismatic and fascinating figure that, for the part where he is not king, we are likely to sympathise with him, or be impressed with him.

  2. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    Therefore it could be argued that on the short-term Edward did solve the succession issue, as he promised a number of people the throne, however on the long-term this made matters worse. The crisis of 1066 leading to the Battle of Hastings could be argued to be Edward's fault, as

  1. On What Basis were the various claims to the throne made in 1066?

    kinship with his nephew Magnus a relatively easier country to rule over. When looking at the claims to the throne in 1066, in particular the claim from Harald must be put in conjunction with the claim from Tostig. For if it was not for Tostig's intervention than Harald would never

  2. Richard III by William Shakespeare - 'How much sympathy do you have for the ...

    (1.3.line 246-7) and seemingly does so to prove to the others that he is not worried about the denunciation by overtly putting on a bravado. In this scene, not much sympathy is inflicted towards Hastings, as although he seems to be deterred by the curse, he puts it to the back of

  1. Why did Richard III take the throne in 1483, and why did he lose ...

    Henry firstly traveled to Wales before commuting to England with an army of 5,000 men; he was ready to fight Richard. Richard was only able to gather 6,000 men. He was supposed to have support from Lord Stanley. However, this did not work out and without the help from Lord Stanley and his brother Richard was sure to be defeated.

  2. How strong was the monarchy on the death of Edward IV in 1483?

    He already had support from York and the Welsh Marches due to his former titles of duke of York and earl of March. Much of Wales was loyal thanks to the presence of the Prince of Wales at Ludlow and the beginnings of the council of Wales.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work