• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Richard III A Wicked Tyrant?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WAS RICHARD III A WICKED TYRANT? Throughout history, this very title has been disputed and the outcome has remained debatable to this very day. Richard, Duke of York had remained loyal to his brother, Edward IV throughout his years of reign, and had been well rewarded for his support, he became the Duke of Gloucester. In marrying Anne Neville, daughter of Earl of Warwick, he had inherited mass amounts of Neville land in the north of England after both the Earl and Anne died. He was respected within the northern parts of England and provided land for his friends. He was an able man who showed signs of being an efficient king amidst the preoccupations of the rebellions, sadly he went about it the wrong way. ...read more.

Middle

He professed that he had been informed, by a Bishop, of how Edward had been betrothed to a woman by the name of Eleanor Boteles, before his marriage to Elizabeth in 1464. This therefore proved the marriage was invalid and the children were bastards. There was no evidence to contradict Richard, as both Edward and Eleanor were dead, she had died a number of years before the story came out. With all other claimants to the throne dead, Richard was the rightful heir. Richard's seizure of the throne could also be seen as ambitious, or overly ambitious, and this cost him support. On becoming king, he had shared southern land between his northern supporters, loosing all trust and loyalty from the south. ...read more.

Conclusion

This revolt collapsed, and Buckingham was executed. The very fact that Richard's closest allies were revolting against him was a clear indication that he would have to fight hard to hold onto the throne and his power. It is probably the suggestion that Richard was responsible for two boys murder that led to many leaving him and supporting the opposition of Henry Tudor who proved to be more than Richard was prepared for. In 1485, Henry landed in Wales, defeated and killed Richard in the battle of Bosworth Field, and ascended the throne. Despite his usurpation of the throne, Richard was not the total villain that tradition has made him, or how his evil reputation, immortalised by Shakespeare's Richard III was portrayed. Richard was the last of the Yorkist kings, and, in retrospect, his death ended the Wars of the Roses. Anna Remington SCM History (2) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. Why did the Yorkist Dynasty Collapse?

    Richard did take over the care of Edward's young heir, King Edward V, and the administration of the kingdom. Richard soon overthrew the unpopular party of the Woodvilles, relatives of the queen mother, who aimed to control the government.

  2. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    There is a huge contrast between Richard's mental attitude and that of Richmond, Richard's enemy. Richard himself is in a terrible state of despair. He believes (correctly) that, ' no creature loves me'. The spirits of those he has so cruelly betrayed and murdered continuously disturbs Richard's sleep.

  1. On What Basis were the various claims to the throne made in 1066?

    If there were to be a succession to the throne purely for family links to Edward than it would have had to be Edward. However putting his career into perspective he had little if any battle experience and very little knowledge of how to run a country under threat of a crusade from the Norman's.

  2. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    However, he is a monster of evil and is determined to achieve his goal whatever the human cost. This shows he is incredibly heartless but no one knows it as yet because Richard is hiding it very well through his charisma and alluring attractive personality.

  1. How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority ...

    of Scotland as the 'special daughter' of the papacy, and to therefore provide an extremely effective response to Edward's arguments for superiority over Scotland. Those documents created after 1306 are certainly due consideration, though they often appear far more like government sponsored endeavours to justify the legitimacy of Bruce's rule to all those that questioned it.

  2. Does Richard the third deserve his reputation?

    unthinkably ugly man that people don't want to look at and he can't bear to look at in a mirror. It was thought that in history he had a slight hunchback and that one of his arms was withered but not as dramatically as it is stated in the play.

  1. How strong was the monarchy on the death of Edward IV in 1483?

    In 1474, following two years of planning and allying with both Burgundy and Brittany, along with various Italian states, Edward levied a benevolence to fund the invasion of France. He had also made trade agreements with the Hanse merchants in the Baltic Sea.

  2. How effective a ruler was Edward 4th from 1471 to 1483?

    Edward was a skilful manager of parliament using charm and sensible choice of speakers to ensure that no major difficulties in this area. In terms of Council matters Edward 4th was not a prolific attendee of council meetings scoring under 50% attendance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work