• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Richard III A Wicked Tyrant?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WAS RICHARD III A WICKED TYRANT? Throughout history, this very title has been disputed and the outcome has remained debatable to this very day. Richard, Duke of York had remained loyal to his brother, Edward IV throughout his years of reign, and had been well rewarded for his support, he became the Duke of Gloucester. In marrying Anne Neville, daughter of Earl of Warwick, he had inherited mass amounts of Neville land in the north of England after both the Earl and Anne died. He was respected within the northern parts of England and provided land for his friends. He was an able man who showed signs of being an efficient king amidst the preoccupations of the rebellions, sadly he went about it the wrong way. ...read more.

Middle

He professed that he had been informed, by a Bishop, of how Edward had been betrothed to a woman by the name of Eleanor Boteles, before his marriage to Elizabeth in 1464. This therefore proved the marriage was invalid and the children were bastards. There was no evidence to contradict Richard, as both Edward and Eleanor were dead, she had died a number of years before the story came out. With all other claimants to the throne dead, Richard was the rightful heir. Richard's seizure of the throne could also be seen as ambitious, or overly ambitious, and this cost him support. On becoming king, he had shared southern land between his northern supporters, loosing all trust and loyalty from the south. ...read more.

Conclusion

This revolt collapsed, and Buckingham was executed. The very fact that Richard's closest allies were revolting against him was a clear indication that he would have to fight hard to hold onto the throne and his power. It is probably the suggestion that Richard was responsible for two boys murder that led to many leaving him and supporting the opposition of Henry Tudor who proved to be more than Richard was prepared for. In 1485, Henry landed in Wales, defeated and killed Richard in the battle of Bosworth Field, and ascended the throne. Despite his usurpation of the throne, Richard was not the total villain that tradition has made him, or how his evil reputation, immortalised by Shakespeare's Richard III was portrayed. Richard was the last of the Yorkist kings, and, in retrospect, his death ended the Wars of the Roses. Anna Remington SCM History (2) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    CLARENCE: His Majesty, Tendr'ing my person's safety, hath appointed This conduct to convey me to th'Tower. RICHARD: Upon what cause? CLARENCE: Because my name is George. RICHARD: Alack, my lord, that fault is none of yours: Richard disgusts us at how he is indirectly killing one of his family members,

  2. How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority ...

    Edward's letter merely states that William "came to king Richard and did him homage."18 This ignores the fact that at Canterbury the king of Scots "did homage for the holding of his dignities in England," but that King Richard...quit claimed him [the Scottish king] and all his heirs for ever ...

  1. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    William the faced baronial rebellion at the time and would not have come to England unless it was something as important as being promised the throne. Therefore, it could be argued that Edward was a failure, as he should not have promised William the throne if he had already promised

  2. How effective a ruler was Edward 4th from 1471 to 1483?

    Edward had removed his untrustworthy brother Clarence in 1478 citing treason charges and in doing this had seemed to have secured his son's succession especially as Edward could not have foreseen dying at 41 and if he had lived only a few more years Edward 5th would have taken the

  1. Richard III by William Shakespeare - 'How much sympathy do you have for the ...

    At the time when Hastings is cursed he seems displaced by Margaret's words as he doesn't reply, but later shakes it off by remarking 'False-boding woman, end thy frantic curse, Lest to thy harm thou move our patience.' (1.3.line 246-7)

  2. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    The 'Dreadful marches' have changed to become 'delightful measures'. Richard continues on, the soldier instead of mounting horses armed for war 'barb�d' in order to terrify his foes, is now able to learn how to dance to the accompaniment of music.

  1. 'Is Richard III a 'bloody tyrant and a homicide' or 'a man of great ...

    It is perhaps the lack of this virtue, which makes the play so intriguing. The play is also about a battle of conscience; Richard refuses to accept he even has a conscience, another sign that he is rooted in pure evil.

  2. Does Richard the third deserve his reputation?

    murder although Richard is the main suspect, in writing this in his play Shakespeare has confirmed suspicions as he has put it in writing and anyone who reads it believes it was him. In history Richard the third reigned from 1483-1485.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work