Was Stanley Kowalski the reason for Blanche's downfall?

Authors Avatar
Was Stanley Kowalski the reason for Blanche's downfall?

Blanches Downfall could have been because of Stanley Kowalski but also it could have been another reason. Perhaps the most obvious one is her difficulty fitting in with life in New Orleans. From the beginning we see Blanche does not fit in with the people of her new community, nor her physical surroundings in her new home. This is shown at the start of scene one when it is easy to see that she disapproves of her sister living there. "This - can this be - her home?" This is perhaps Blanche being subtle as later when the place is described as having "raffish charm", Blanche does not even recognise that and she describes it as, "Only Poe! Only Edgar Allen Poe! - Could do it justice!"

Blanche represents a deep-seated attachment to the past. She has lived her whole life in Laurel, a small southern town; her family had upper-class roots and taught Blanche about some of the finer things in life. Unfortunately she cannot cope with life outside Laurel. Her refusal to come out of the time warp makes her unrealistic and flighty. When Blanche appears, she is described in detail, not only her clothes but also the impression she gives of delicacy and vulnerability. "There is something about her uncertain manner", and the way she drinks as soon as she reaches the apartment shows that she is extremely nervous and uncomfortable. "Her white that suggest a moth."

There is an irony about the clothes Blanche wears and the way she dresses. She is glamorous and always appears wearing light, and white clothes although it is a desire to be pure, which we learn she is definitely not. What's more she bathes constantly throughout the play. This represents her need to purify herself from her past. Blanche could easily be described as very vain. In her first meeting with Stella in scene one she says, "you haven't said a word about my appearance."

When they lived in Belle Reve they obviously had a lot of money and lead a wealthy life. Stella seems to have come to terms with or may even be happy with the way she is living now, even though it is not to the same standards as she once lived. When Blanche wonders how Stella copes living in the conditions, Stella replies, "aren't you being a little intense about it? It's not that bad at all! New Orleans isn't like other cities." This shows a clear difference between the sisters and illustrates that Blanche still wants to live how she did in Laurel, which is clearly the past. "The loss - the loss..." As we know Blanche and Stella grew up on a plantation, which, being in one of the Southern states, probably used slavery although it may have been before the birth of the sisters. However it is fair to assume that interacts with coloured people daily. In the opening scene Eunice and a Negro woman seem to be chatting in a relaxed atmosphere.
Join now!


This is not to say that Blanche does not communicate with the Negro woman, but it gives the impression from the way Blanche acts in other situations that she is not as 'modern' as the people who live in New Orleans. Tennessee Williams infuses Blanche and Stanley with the symbols of opposing class, historical periods, ways of life and differing attitudes towards sex and love. It is hard to say whether one character wither completely good or bad, because the main characters are themselves internally torn by conflicting and contradictory desires. There are two types of music used ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

This essay has an appalling introduction. It is not good enough at GCSE to say "Blanches Downfall could have been because of Stanley Kowalski but also it could have been another reason" and sit on the fence. It's best to have a clear line of argument and support this argument throughout with evidence and analysis. The word perhaps is used too much here, and isn't the sort of critical language which shows a fluent and confident argument. Using phrases such as "it is clear from the evidence" or "it could be argued that, however the analysis shows" will make an argument more convincing. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are fine.

The analysis in this essay is basic. Too often does this essay build an argument by retelling the plot. For example saying "Stanley has become suspicious about Blanche" will gain no credit, and shows a lack of understanding that Stanley is a construction of Williams. I would note that if you write with the awareness that Williams has constructed the characters, you will naturally analyse his techniques and look at why he has chosen them. For example starting a paragraph "Williams has Stanley become suspicious of Blanche early on to show his presence in her downfall" would allow analysis of the techniques. It was a shame to see "through the course of the book" in this essay as it shows a gross misinterpretation of the piece as a book, rather than a play. This essay doesn't focus on the character's presence on stage, or how the audience respond to Stanley and Blanche's relationship. This is what examiners are looking for when setting questions about drama, and unfortunately this essay will be hindered by simply narrating the plot and not discussion the dramatic response of the audience.

I have reviewed this essay as it's a perfect example of an argument being built, but without any solid analysis whatsoever. To that end, this essay responds well to task and engages well with the question, showing a great knowledge of the play. However, there is no close textual analysis of language, form and structure. The audience isn't referred to once in this essay, and so it is missing one of the main assessment objectives. Essays at GCSE level must discuss how Williams' techniques and choices affect the audience response, and how the characters presence on stage forms interpretations and meanings.