• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

Was Thornbury castle built as a palace or for defence?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was Thornbury castle built as a palace or for defence? By Sara Booker Thornbury castle Since Thornbury castle started being built in 1511 it has been in the centre of a debate with historians whether it is a castle built for defence or a luxurious palace for show. When I went to Thornbury castle you can see lots of different features that would confuse you in deciding what Thornbury castle was built for. There are lots of different features showing both. This picture shows some arrow slits. As you walk around the castle you see things like arrow slits and gun loops in the walls showing they were probably built in case of an attack. Around the outer and inner gateway walls there are portcullis grooves which were never finished if it had have been the walls would have been as high again this is because there is nowhere for the gates to go. Around the castle towers there should have been crenellations which you can see on the only finished tower the crenellations which are the thing around the top are used to shoot between the gaps and hide in the higher bits. Underneath the crenellations there are machicolations which were used to pour thing though (e.g. red hot oil or stones) ...read more.

Middle

In 1855 the gate house of Thornbury Castle was restored but it has Victorian additions they use small crenellations for decoration & features showing off how grand the castle is, in a way I think this ruins the look of the gate house because it doesn't fit in with the look and era of the original castle. When Thornbury castle was being built in the 16th century people had really gives up on building castles (especially for defence) and had started building houses instead. These houses did keep some of the features of castles (e.g. some even had moats around them) but they weren't building room for an army, so this makes you wonder why was Edward Stafford building enough room for his own private army? This makes Thornbury castle atypical of the time. The group of castles that had been built around the same time as Thornbury castle some historians now call 'Tudor Castle Palaces' this is because they have features of being both a castle and a palace. They have defensive feature like moats but they have the luxury of a palace. There are three castles considered to be 'Tudor Castle Palaces' Thornbury Castle, Hampton Court and Richmond Palace Richmond Palace was erected in 1501 by Henry 7th it was built on the site of the old Royal Residence of Sheen in surrey on the Thames, it was meant to be the largest most magnificent of his residences. ...read more.

Conclusion

'Although incapable of serious defence (in spite of gun ports) we are certainly dealing with a chateau, even if a manor in English, although in fact in this case 'castle' has been kept in the title' In the second quotation it is saying that Thornbury castle is nothing more than a decorated manor which I agree with, I personal think that Buckingham wanted to compete with Wolsey trying to build the most luxurious palace in England. Also if you were building a castle for the purpose of serious defence then you wouldn't build it next to the church making an obvious weakness. In contrast to that some historians though believe that Thornbury was the 'Last genuine castle' "The last English castle to be built with a serious purpose of defence" This quote was written by W. Douglas-Simpson I don't agree with this because buildings like Deal castle were built after Thornbury started being built in the 1540's and this fort was built by Henry VIII were built in case of possible intrusions of other European powers faithful to Rome after Henry turned his back on the catholic religion. After looking at whether Thornbury castle was built as a palace or a castle for defence I have decided that Thornbury castle was built as a palace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. How Genuine was the Relationship Between Richard and Buckingham?

    a few minutes before their parts have to be played and yet everything still manages to work out just right. Their plan is that in order to avoid suspicion about Hastings' death, they have to try and convince everyone that they are frightened for their own lives and that there

  2. Did Buckingham build Thornbury Castle, his home, as a palace or a castle for ...

    Buckingham built an elaborate Tudor chimney which was really impressive and showed off his wealth. He also copied his style of windows from Henry VIII's castle at Windsor which also proves he was a show off. In the 16th centaury people were not building castles because they were expensive, there

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    . . Is there a murderer? No - yes, I am. Then fly. What, from myself? Great reason why - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  2. The aim of these piece was to show the theme of survival. In fact, ...

    The piece had some weaknesses as well. First thing I think that, our piece could have been longer so that could have been more effective. Another weakness is that we couldn't use the stage and the piece could have been better if acted on stage.

  1. How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority ...

    one bishopric to another, nor one kingdom to another, nor one king to another."16 Bisset's intentions may have been well conceived then, but due to his slighted history and his apparent sacrifice of principles in order to win over the papacy, the potency of his argument is subdued.

  2. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    Edward did not have a consistent succession policy; he changed his mind as circumstances changed. Edward promised Swein of Denmark the throne because according to Adam of Bremen5 in 1047 threatened to invade England. 'Edward made peace with the despot, designating him to be, on his death, the next heir to the English throne, even if Edward had sons.'

  1. My task is to investigate all the evidence and see how much I agree ...

    When Henry died, his son Edward became King. Things began to become tense, firstly, when Llewelyn refused to attend Edward's coronation. He gave the excuse that he feared for his life. A year later, King Edward travelled all the way to Chester for a meeting with Llewelyn to give him a chance to pay homage.

  2. North and South Essay

    "He's planning on leaving Helstone in a fortnight." I was shocked. A fortnight? But that wasn't enough time. I tried to calm myself, after all it wasn't my fault. If Richard had consulted me first none of this would be happening. He should have come to me with his doubts, with his fears.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work