What are the different methods of seduction employed by the poets in 'To His Coy Mistress' and 'The Flea'? How do you find them effective?

Authors Avatar

What are the different methods of seduction employed by the poets in ‘To His Coy Mistress’ and ‘The Flea’? How do you find them effective?

 The content of “To His Coy Mistress” is a monologue of, presumably, the poet, Andrew Marvell, showing off his powers of persuasion, rhetoric and seduction to a woman. In “To His Coy Mistress”, Marvell uses a syllogism, to present his argument. Premise one is the first stanza; “had we but world enough, and time, this coyness lady were no crime” says that if Marvell and his mistress had all the time in the world then they could appreciate each other forever.

However, premise two, the second stanza, contradicts this; “But at my back I always hear time’s winged chariot hurrying near” which shows that there isn’t enough time in the world and in conclusion, halfway through the second stanza, “Now therefore, while the youthful hue sits on thy skin...tear our pleasures with rough strife through the iron gates of life” demonstrates that even though there isn’t enough time in the world, they can still enjoy themselves while it lasts. The tone of the poem is lustful rather than romantic; with Marvell using witty and clever language to seduce “his mistress”.

 

 The purpose of “The Flea” is the same as of “To His Coy Mistress”; to seduce the mistress of the poet. “The Flea” is also written as a monologue, and presumably, the poet, John Donne, is also trying to seduce the silent, tacit woman in his poetic dialectical, argument, as he aims to arrive at the truth through opposing positions, views and arguments. Much like Marvell, Donne also uses a syllogism as the structural basis of his persuasive argument, however, he also uses the flea as a conceit; a cleverly played on extended metaphor. Premise one, is the first stanza of the poem, in which the flea has taken blood from the man and the woman, which is, “a sin, nor shame, nor loss of maidenhead”; this is effectively premise one summarised, that the woman losing her honour is equivalent to losing a drop of blood to the flea.

Premise two, in the second stanza, where the woman makes to squash the flea, but the poet interrupts, “Oh stay three lives in one flea spare, where we almost, yea more than married are”, saying that there are now three lives joined and married in this one flea and by killing the flea she is taking three lives which is “sacrilege, three sins in killing three” lives, which demonstrates one of the themes in the poem, that the 3 lives are much like the holy trinity, of the son, the father and the holy spirit.

Join now!

Premise two in that stanza, of the argument, in a sarcastic tone, “Though use make you apt killing me, let not that self-murder added be”; mockingly means that the woman can squash the flea but despite killing a bit of the speaker, she shouldn’t kill herself because that would be sacrilege and a sin, although the real meaning of this last line is that she can kill the flea with no real loss to herself. In the last stanza, which has a much darker feel, and is the conclusion of the 3-part a syllogism, Donne has arrived at the truth ...

This is a preview of the whole essay