• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What dramatic techniques does J B Priestley use to sustain the audience’s interest in the play?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What dramatic techniques does J B Priestley use to sustain the audience's interest in the play? J.B. Priestley uses a great number of ways to sustain the audience's interest in 'An Inspector Calls' by using a variety of dramatic techniques. The play was set in 1912, and being set at this time, there was not only the opportunity for predictions, but also for a more drastic look at the relationship between the rich and the poor. The class gap of 1912 was much larger than that of 1946, and so was more noticeable to the audiences. Priestley tries to put a number of messages across to the audience with dramatic devices. In the play he teaches of how, '...man will be taught in fire, blood and anguish.' The whole play is centred around the inspectors' constant interrogation and questioning. This enables us to understand the characters' personalities, their morals, values, and abilities to realise their own mistakes and change. It is through this interrogation that most, if not all of the relevant information in the play is unveiled, allowing us to go from that state of ignorance to the state of knowledge. The character of Inspector Goole is mysterious. This air of mystery is intentional. He is mysterious because of his character. The name Inspector Goole is an obvious pun. We as an audience never find out who this Inspector is. There are many possibilities - he could be the ghost of Eva Smith avenging her death; he could be some form of cosmic balance, keeping people considerate; he could be amass hallucination brought on by too much champagne of something in the food. He could be anybody or anything. Priestley left the character as a mystery so as to have a larger impact on the audience, making them think more about the play, and helping them think more about the messages the play brings. ...read more.

Middle

Although the inspector was a hoax and the girl wasn't dead all the things that everyone did to her really happened. Sheila was trying to make everyone see that. She is really angry that her parents are just going to go on the way they always have and she says, "So nothing really happened. So there's nothing to be sorry for, nothing to learn. We can all go on behaving just as we did". Sheila doesn't like this and she lets them know how she feels. After this the family learn that a girl has just died after swallowing disinfectant and they all stare guiltily and dumbfounded at each other. Priestley uses the inspector's constant interrogation in order to develop the plot. The fact that through this questioning the audience, as well as the characters in the play move from ignorance to knowledge proves the effectiveness of this interrogation. The plot is also developed by the fluidity of the action, and how everything fits into place. He uses the dramatic unities of time and place very successfully, this is achieved by the whole play-taking place in that one location - the dining room and the events running incessantly throughout the play. These are examples of how the principle of the detective story is used to develop the plot of the play. Another example is the mood changes that are so effective in "An Inspector Calls", the atmosphere is so happy and the future seems so positive at the beginning of the play with the celebration of Sheila's engagement to Gerald; the mood gradually becomes more dull with it hitting a climax as the inspector delivers his departure speech and very bad things are predicted for the future. The use of this convention to develop the plot is also evident through the fact that reality is combined with the uncertainty of the inspector's and Eva's identities, which is a common occurrence in detective stories. ...read more.

Conclusion

It symbolises that you can't run from your conscience, as the Birlings will find out. Priestley uses the dramatic twist of the Inspector returning at the end of the play to emphasis this point, and makes it more effective by placing it just as the characters are beginning to relax. It serves to 'prick' the consciences of both the characters and the audience. At the end of reading the play, I was left feeling as if I would like to think I had learned from the example of the Birlings and the message it contained. As it is a play though, I would have liked to see it acted out. The ending is well crafted, leaving an open ending to add to the dramatic effect, but looking at it differently, there is not really another way to have ended the play after that plot twist other than an open ending where it was without ruining the play itself. I think the majority of people who have seen this play would have liked to think of themselves as an Eric or a Sheila. The aim of Priestley when he wrote this play, I believe, was to make us think, to make us question our own characters and beliefs. He wasted to show us that we can change, and we can decide which views we side with. He wanted us to ask ourselves if we wanted to be a Sheila, an Eric or an Arthur. Or, were we in-between like Gerald. Priestley wanted the audience to learn from the mistakes of the Birlings. I think that Priestley wanted to make a difference; not a world changing difference, but a small difference in the way people think. Then, if you think of every person who coming out of the play gave some money to a beggar in the street, you would see that Priestley did make a difference. It would have changed people's views on society, however small those changes would be, and so Priestley achieved his aims in writing the play using different dramatic techniques to sustain the audience interest and attention. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Compare and contrast the characters of Mr. Birling and inspector Goole. How does Priestley ...

    Priestly is trying to say that the inspector is not a real Inspector but can be the voice of a conscience. Priestly also uses dramatic devices to shape the audiences response by when Birling spoke about the titanic, when to the audience it had already sunk.

  2. Discussthe role of the Inspector in the play 'An Inspector Calls'

    When a director is casting this role he would have to consider many aspects of Inspector Goole's character. The actor would have to make an impression of massiveness, thou he need not be a large man but neither should he be small and feeble looking, the actor needs to be

  1. Inspector Calls-How Sheila Birling Changes And Develops Through The Play

    She tries to intimidate him and when she is shown the picture of the body she lies to him and claims she does not recognise the girl. She tries to deny obvious facts about Eric's drinking. Mrs Birling is a snob and looks down on the working class.

  2. What effect does the visit of Inspector Goole have on the Birling family? How ...

    Why shouldn't she try for higher wages? We try for the highest possible prices. And I don't see why she should have been sacked just because she'd a bit more spirit than the others. I'd have let her stay." Eric shows genuine sympathy, even in Act 3 where he explains his involvement with Eva, and when inspector

  1. In Act I of An Inspector Calls how does J B Priestley use dramatic ...

    The audience would begin to realise by the end of Act I that this is not a normal whodunit and that each member of the family can be blamed, although how much they are all to blame doesn't become clear until later.

  2. An Inspector calls Compare and contrast the way in which Arthur and Sheila Birling ...

    Arthur Birling is a traditionalist. Arthur, Gerald and Eric are talking when the Inspector arrives. The Inspector explains that the reason for him being hear is because a young girl has committed suicide and it is then revealed how each members of the same family contributed to it Priestly has

  1. An Inspector Calls - Compare and contrast the reactions of the older generation and ...

    It is my opinion that she only becomes hysterical when one of the other persons being questioned starts to, or intends to, lie to the Inspector. This, I feel, is actually due to Sheila's perceptive nature as, after she herself is questioned, she realises the Inspector knows a lot more than he is letting on.

  2. How does J B Priestley use the Inspector as a voice for social change?

    The Inspectors blunt manner is used to show how he doesn?t want to sympathise with the family. Priestley creates Mr Birling?s character like this to represent the capitalist views on society and how you should always think about the consequences of your actions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work