What is important to Shakespeare in his construction of selected scenes from 'Romeo and Juliet'? How and why is this conveyed? Consider how the dramatists work is developed, modified and enhanced by Zeffirelli and Luhrmann cinematic adaptations.

Authors Avatar

Romeo and Juliet Essay

Task: What is important to Shakespeare in his construction of selected scenes from ‘Romeo and Juliet’? How and why is this conveyed? Consider how the dramatists work is developed, modified and enhanced by Zeffirelli and Luhrmann cinematic adaptations.

Targets: 1) Explore alternative approaches and interpretations of material.

2) Convey your ideas coherently, vigorously, enthusiastically and persuasively.

Within this essay I am going to study a select few scenes of Shakespeare play, Romeo and Juliet; act one scene one, act one scene five and act two scene four.  

Shakespeare starts the play with a prologue, which foretells the story line, I believe this is done so that the reader/viewer can understand the speed and sets the dramatically sad mood, which are the main themes for the play. As Shakespeare briefly relays the play, it makes the reader think that it does not matter if they know what is going to happen yet makes them more interested and curious with the intricate details of the play. In Shakespeare’s time language imagery was a great hit with his audience, and the imagery used at the start of this play would have settled the large audience so that he could continue with his play.

Zeffirelli (director of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in 1968 set in Verona) uses Shakespeare’s prologue to introduce his cinematic interpretation but he cuts down the length, using only lines one too eight. I believe this is to emphasise on Shakespeare’s theme of speed, although he may also have cut it because it is more to do with the stage and not really relevant to the cinema going audience. As this is being read out a scene is set of a market stall with a castle like foyer. The reader of the prologues voice is deep and wisdom like as if they was a narrator for the play, I

Believe Zeffirelli has done this to etch a sense of mystery and curiosity into the story line. This would interest the cinema going audience of the time.

Luhrmann’s (director of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in 1997 set in the U.S.A) edition is also different he puts across the prologue twice mainly because his audience had changed, and he knew that the people going to see his film would not be going in respect for Shakespeare but mainly for the stars that played the characters, so the audience may not understand the language thus needing to see and hear the text twice. The first prologue is seen on a television screen and read by a black lady on a news broadcast, I believe it is read by this reporter to show how times have changed and how black women now have jobs such as this as in Shakespeare’s time there would have been no black women in his plays, or any women at all regardless of their colour. It is read in silence, except for her voice. A large sound build up follows this to interest the viewer and grip them, then many images are flashed up of the scene in which the play is set, again to emphasise Shakespeare’s theme of speed. Another key theme within Shakespeare’s play is religion, which is demonstrated on most of the images shown. The next prologue is then put across in a large deep informative voice and displayed as newspaper articles on screen.

We then move on to the first scene of the play. Shakespeare is very clever with his writing skills here and introduces us to two vile characters, Sampson and Gregory from the Capulet household. The characters enter and they appear to be having an argument. To Shakespeare’s audience of the day the vulgar imagery would have most of them in fits of hysterics, although times have changed and this imagery may now be thought indecent and vile. The language I speak of is thus, “thrust his maids to the wall.” Sampson here is saying that he is going to rape the Montague maids. Rape at the present time is physically disgusting and I believe it was still the same in the days of Shakespeare so I personally cannot see why the people of the day would laugh at this scene, it may possibly because they find this kind of talk erotic or sexual in some nature, although I myself find this wrong and degrading. Sampson then goes on to say “I will cut of their heads” this could be taken in two ways, it may be taken as in the physical meaning to literally decapitate the maids or it could mean to take their maidenheads which means to take their virginity. As sexual banter surrounds this phrase I would take it as the second option. Sampson then goes on to boast about his reproductive organs, “I am a pretty piece of flesh.” although Gregory takes away his pride and tells him that his penis is not all that, “thou hadst been poor-john.”, a poor-john is a dried up fish. I believe Shakespeare put the argument in to get the attention of the audience.

If the audience found sexual banter amusing then Shakespeare met their needs and fed their amusement. Now as the audience were content with the plot and settled into the scene Shakespeare could continue with his play. Shakespeare then livens up the scene by adding a fight. Two servants of Montague enter and Sampson bites his thumb at Abraham. In Shakespeare’s time biting your thumb at someone is the equivalent to sticking up your middle finger in present day times. Benvolio then enters and briefly stops the fight although the peace does not last as Tybalt enters and it starts again. I believe that this puts across the emphasis on what these two characters represent. Benvolio of the Montague household represents peace and Tybalt of the Capulet house represents evil and war, in Latin their names also mean peace and evil. As Benvolio enters his language shows his peaceful personality, “Part fools, put up your swords you know not what you do.” This puts a pleasant slant on the story, making his character seem positive and peaceful. Although when Tybalt enters he tilts the story back the opposite way and gives him an evil and menacing persona, “I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.” This shows that Tybalts character has the above traits.

Join now!

 Montague and Capulet are introduced along with ladies, they the start to brawl along with their families. After the fight has commenced the Prince enters and stops the fight he then warns the families that if they are to fight again they would be killed. After the fight lady Montague appears to put the fight behind and talks of nothing but here beloved son Romeo, “I am glad he was not at this fray.” This shows that the Montague household is close. Benvolio goes to find his cousin Romeo. Romeo is introduced as a heartbroken teenager who seems to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay