• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is significant about the way David Hare ends "Skylight"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is significant about the way David Hare ends "Skylight"? "Skylight" by David Hare is a post 1914, post Thatcher drama, dealing with matters of life, love and circumstance. It is set in a small, well lived in, flat, Northwest London, where Kyra, a middle aged, self-reliant teacher, lives. Tom, a guilt ridden, controlling, entrepreneur, randomly appears, at Kyra's doorstep. He casually invades her privacy, wanting to rekindle past love, when success was his, after a three-year separation. The stubborn pair hold the stage for the entire 2 1/2 hours tearing away at each other's deceptions and hypocrisies, except for brief but significant, visit's by Tom's rebellious, insecure, son Edward. This play is very contemporary, dealing with issues relevant at the time. The time is post Thatcher, although Tom still is part of the Conservative, right wing system, working for himself. Kyra, on the contrary, is a left wing, labour supporter, who helps other people. Tom is not able to put passion before political values, whereas Kyra is. David Hare structures the play quite effectively, using 2 acts and 4 scenes. The play is detailed, and probes the depths of intimacy between the 4 characters-one of whom is Alice, who we never see, but whose presence is always lurking in the form of guilt. ...read more.

Middle

He put his hand through her hair.' Tom: 'Kyra, Kyra I'm back.' 'He runs his hand over and over through her hair. The lights fade to darkness.' Food is all show, it is formal, controlled and has a strict set of rules. Tom likes food precisely because of the order, he can't bear anything that isn't controlled by money, which is why he blames other people when he lets out his feelings, (pg.52) Tom: 'Edward was as bad...he failed just as badly. In a different way. I came home, six friends of his lying on the floor, drinking Heineken. Drugs. Shit.' Tom uses food to hide behind, (pg.39) Kyra:' Will you grate the cheese?' Tom:'...I wouldn't give this greasy lump of crud to my cat...Are you really living like this? Why didn't you say? For God's sake, I have this supplier...' Tom uses this example to show how upset he is that Kyra chose a poorly paid, job above the rich, extravagant life she could have had with him. He doesn't understand that Kyra actually likes being a teacher, he doesn't understand her vocation. When Tom says 'I have this supplier', it really upsets Kyra, because she hates the way Tom uses money to get round things, and she feels that Tom is pitying her, saying that her life would be better if she had him. ...read more.

Conclusion

When Tom came back, all the memories of the forgotten past are dredged up, and while Kyra makes the food, each memory becomes clearer, and clearer. They argue, passionately, more, and more until everything hurtful has been said, and there is nothing left to do other than say 'goodbye', because they both know that nothing could be more different than themselves. Edward finishes the play, by bringing what Kyra remembered from the days with Tom as a happy time. Tom wanted to stay with Kyra, not just because he loves her, but because he needed someone to comfort him because really, underneath all those outer barriers of clothes and anger, is a very lonely person, screaming with self-pity, anguish and guilt. In losing Kyra, Tom has lost pretty much everything that matters to him. The breakfast at the end is so meaningful because it shows how Edward is the New Hope, he can change and be a better person than his father. The breakfast reinforces the issue that Edward may not be as rich or as business like as his father, but he will definitely be more loved and respected. David Hare wants the audience to grasp the lifestyle of the characters, but also how they link to the lifestyles of everyday people, how none of us have normal lives and we all have such different understandings and concepts. No one can ever change anyone else; they can only change themselves. Ruth Knox February 2003 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    Yet so much is my poverty of spirit, So mighty and so many my defects That I would rather hide me from my greatness - The other reason, probably the most important reason at the time is that he is not needed because there are already legal heirs to the

  2. Discuss how the climatic scenes from Edward Scissorhands and Sleepy Hollow make use of ...

    The narrative/dialogue is used similarly in Edward Scissorhands, to help the audience understand the plot and more specifically what is happening in each scene. In Edward Scissorhands, we see a scene where Edward has to describe his innocence and ignorance to the suburban life, after living in his house alone for most of his life.

  1. What were the reasons behind Harold's visit to Normandy and How was the Visit ...

    The possibilities seem endless as to the reasons why Harold found himself in Normandy in 1064. In addition with this the event in itself had extreme significance on the forthcoming history of Harold and William as well as Britain and Normandy.

  2. How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority ...

    the struggling Scottish cause with an essential legitimacy in the eyes of the academic and clerical elite in Europe, that would have a lasting influence across the social, political and economic spheres of the conflict. The response from the Scots to Edward's claims was almost immediate and took the retaliatory

  1. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    With the Scots, Malcolm opposed King Macbeth. Edward sided with Macbeth and Macbeth was able to kill Malcolm. Malcolm married Margaret, who became popular in Scotland. This enabled peace to be achieved with Scotland. According to Barlow, Edward was able to maintain peace within the kingdom, 'between 1063 and 1065 the English kingdom was at peace.'

  2. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    Also according to Snorri Sturluson he says that Edward was 'nicknamed Edward the Good, which describes him well...By the English he is regarded as a saint." According to Barlow, Edward had no ambition to widen his empire his policy towards Scotland and Wales, like his Scandinavian policy, was purely defensive.

  1. Why were the crises of 1051 and 1052 significant?

    In response Godwin did what he probably did best and passed the blame onto HarthaCnut. Godwin, like Edward, was very much a family man. He tried desperately to get his family in major roles in the running of the country.

  2. Richard III Manipulates the Court of York in the same way that Shakespeare Manipulates ...

    All he really wishes to do is make his tedious life more interesting as really he has no need to be higher than he is at the beginning as the Duke of Gloucester is a very high position with nearly as much money as the king would have had as he was his brother.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work