• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is so Great about Gatsby? The word great in the title gives the expectation to the reader that Gatsby is going to be a marvellous character with strong morals, great achievements and a desire to change and improve things.

Extracts from this document...


What is so Great about Gatsby? The word great in the title gives the expectation to the reader that Gatsby is going to be a marvellous character with strong morals, great achievements and a desire to change and improve things. This expectation of him is not fulfilled and the character presented is not the one the title suggests. This is not to say that Gatsby is not great, he is in many ways remarkable in terms of his motivation, determination and ability to succeed. He has achieved more than most could ever dream of and yet he is still unhappy, and it is this unhappiness which leads to his downfall. Gatsby is most definitely great and in reading the book this is recognisable but, it is hard to pinpoint why. In this essay I will look at different aspects of Gatsby's character and compare him with other characters in an attempt to identify what is great about him. L. Marx in an essay 'Pastoralism in America' noted that it is 'by comparison with the "rotten crowd" of people who typify society Gatsby is meant to earn our approval'1 (59). This is very much the case, whilst Gatsby does make mistakes during the book it is with great intentions. Other characters are portrayed as undertaking purely selfish aims, specifically to benefit themselves. This fact evokes support and sympathy from the reader towards Gatsby as we recognise this. It is therefore important that we get to know other characters in the book before we meet Gatsby so we can make comparisons between them and Gatsby. The first person we are introduced to in the book is Nick, the narrator, and it is via him that we obtain all our knowledge about Gatsby. ...read more.


There is a man simply described as being 'about my age' and quite unremarkable. This is out of the ordinary for many reasons; firstly that we have to wait a long time to be introduced to Gatsby and yet he is the books hero and title character, he is built up in our minds as something different and almost mythical. Yet here we see a very human image presented, he is an army man, which, immediately displays a sense of mortality about him, his persona may be a myth but he is physically very real and there is nothing which distinguishes him in that way from anybody else. We do not at this point get an impression that Gatsby is great and neither does he himself despite the character being his own invention he is quick to criticise himself saying 'I'm not a very good host'. This shows to us that he is not without fault and that he is aware of those faults. It also enforces a new image of the character, the man who was previously allusive and unobtainable now appears very ordinary. It is the reader's first indication that there may be something going on beneath the surface of his character which is far from ordinary. We learn more about this through his interaction with the other main characters and with people in general. Although at first it appears as though he keeps himself very much to himself he actually has interaction with all the other main characters. And for this reason we are able to view Gatsby in many different roles. To Nick he becomes a friend, in this role Gatsby is generous and loyal it is said 'he would never so much as look as a friends wife'. ...read more.


She merely desires more money for herself and if she shows love for anybody or anything in the book then it is money. In conclusion Gatsby appears great at the start because he possesses a lot and looks to be someone people admire, but the bitter truth is quite different. He does not have any real friends except, perhaps, Nick and this is not entirely his own fault. He took the task upon himself to achieve great things and he achieved that aim without hurting anybody else. But people wanted to see him lose what he had fought to obtain because it threatened their own positions in society. Any relationship they appeared to hold with him were merely for their own benefit and Gatsby was too na�ve to realise this. So he is great because despite all his masks he manages to hold more truth and depth of character than those around him, his act is harmless. Those people around Gatsby who pretend to be friends and pretend to be there for him; their act is not harmless, they are out to destroy him and even through his death they do not achieve this aim. They wanted Gatsby to be revealed for what he was, a fraud, and were so determined that this happened that even when he died they held their grudges. By not turning up to Gatsby's funeral instead of burying his persona they enabled it to live on as a legend. He never does not get Daisy but his mystery is retained, nobody really knows how he made his money and the myths and rumours he thrived on are still spread about him. The character of Gatsby that was created could never be destroyed and neither could his achievements. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE F. Scott Fitzgerald section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

This is an excellently-formed piece of coursework. It's analysis is good, and it draws a nice, concise conclusion from such an extensive length. There is a good understanding of the character and how other characters perceive him - though perhaps ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This is an excellently-formed piece of coursework. It's analysis is good, and it draws a nice, concise conclusion from such an extensive length. There is a good understanding of the character and how other characters perceive him - though perhaps not quite as firm a hold how the reader sees Gatsby (after all, we only see him through Nick's eyes, and Nick contradicts himself a lot in the novel as he finds himself repelled by and attracted to Gatsby's opulent life-style). Nonetheless, there is a sensitive appraisal of how the character is formed and a good understanding of his back story, all of which are implemented into analysis that calls to question the apparent irony of labeling Jay Gatsby a "Great" man. It is correctly noted early on that perhaps the title, unlike so many come to fully realise, is not actually ironic. Once Nick leaves West Egg he sobers from his party-intoxicated mind and realises that actually Gatsby was the most real person he ever met there, and that is because Gatsby never originally grew up in the life-style, and so had is moral built on arguably more sturdy foundations. It appears a little understood, the process by which Gatsby acquired his money though, as he participated in bootlegging and illicit alcohol laundering, often having to kill men in the process, so he did actually hurt some people, but this is testament to his undying fervour to seek Daisy Buchanan, and hence why Nick refers to him as "Great". All this is here in this candidate's essay, but some areas are slightly more 'woolly' than otherwise and find it hard to pinpoint want they want to say. To a literature student it is clear, but I would recommend being a little more precise in the future, so that if an examiner is instructed to act as if they are not familiar with the text you can avoid common pitfalls that may cost marks.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis is very good. Though not exhaustive, the candidate considers a number of theories as to the title calling Gatsby "Great". It is a common misconception that this is an ironic move and that Fitzgerald is saying there was in fact nothing admirable about Gatsby. But due to this candidate close attention to the methods in which Fitzgerald allows Nick to give us information about Gatsby, it is clear to from the start see this candidate is competent enough that they can identify the true meaning of the title.

Everything written is valid generally, though some specific details compromise the overall effectiveness, for instance calling Gatsby "childlike". Whilst yes, this may seem a logical assumption, perhaps the word "naive" would suit the analysis better ("naive" was used earlier in the essay, so whilst I recognise this is probably what you meant, other examiners may not so always be sure that you are saying exactly what you want to say, because Gatsby does not have the characteristics of a child at all - quite possible the one-dimensional simplicity of a child who desperately wants something, yes, but this must be made clearer).

One piece of analysis that I've always thought about when considering the title is that the use of the word "Great" recalls many of the stage names for great illusionists of the time. Magic shows and magicians were the dominant breed of live entertainers at the time and were renowned for conjuring grand, elaborate tricks to fool the eyes of thousands of baying onlookers, but were often very unprofessional and cheating behind their extravagant appearance and stage presence. And so is it possible that Fitzgerald is drawing comparison between Gatsby's efforts to reinvent himself as a wealthy socialite wearing a veneer of vulgar ostentation and the same misleading guise worn by magicians and illusionists of the time?

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is very good; only very minor errors are made as a result of perhaps not re-checking as rigorously as is possible, but no matter as the clarity of the essay's analysis is not compromised. The spelling, grammar and punctuation are all acceptable and show a candidate who writes with flair and confidence when analysing literature.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 20/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE F. Scott Fitzgerald essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Examine the ways in which The Great Gatsby explores the corruptive effects of wealth. ...

    5 star(s)

    To acquire his wealth, Gatsby was involved in fraudulent behaviour and was an example of the corruptive effect of wealth. When Jay Gatsby was a soldier during World War One, he feel in love with the 'bright eye[d]...passionate' Daisy, but the pair did not marry (p.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Symbolism in The Great Gatsby.

    5 star(s)

    As James E. Miller remarks, "What ultimately preys on the vision, the goal, is that in America and by Gatsby it can only be attained through the acquisition of material possessions" (Miller 28). Gatsby is striving to find a better world in the green light and gets unbearably close to

  1. Great Gatsby Reading Questions and answers.

    He often makes judgements about people unknowingly. He is quite judgemental. If he knew them well enough, he would change his opinion on someone. He 3. Pay attention to time. What is the day and year during the first scene at Daisy's house? It was the early summer in 1922 as the story stared.

  2. The Dissolution of the American dream in The Great Gatsby

    "That was it. I'd never understood before. It was full of money - that was the inexhaustible charm that rose and fell in it, the jingle of it, the cymbals' song of it... high in a white palace the king's daughter, the golden girl" Gatsby originated as a poor kid, who worked hard to make a lot of money.

  1. How Has Fitzgerald Presented The Character Of Daisy In 'The Great Gatsby'?

    Daisy also speaks very quietly to Nick, which he says is 'only to make people lean towards her'. Even though it is presented as endearing, with Nick saying that even though her murmur was to make people lean towards her it 'made it no less charming', is does alert the

  2. Examine the contradictions in The Great Gatsby, including its narrative styles.

    In the first paragraph of chapter three, we learn that this is Nick's first experience of a Gatsby party. Unlike the majority of the other guests, the reader knows that Nick has been formally invited by Gatsby himself. The author gives a very detailed description of the party, the guests and the surroundings.

  1. Both the short story The Necklace and the novel The Great Gatsby contain characters ...

    Instead of contemplating on telling her friend the truth, Madame Loisel seeks a dishonest subterfuge. Had Madame Loisel told the truth, she would not have suffered the past ten years, straining to save out an immense amount of money for a piece of jewelry which her friend later calls "paste" (Guy de Maupassant 5).

  2. Repeating the past in The Great Gatsby

    Just as Daisy can't leave the present and return to her past life with Gatsby she can't forget her past and live her present life with Tom. Even after five years his name still strikes an emotional chord with her.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work