What is the moral message Priestly wants us to learn from the play an inspector calls?

Authors Avatar

Sam Caddy

What is the moral message that Priestly wants us to learn from the play an inspector calls?

In this essay I will be exploring several characters in the play of An Inspector Calls. After exploring these characters I will analyse them again to see what developments may happen to them after they are interrogated by the inspector. I will also explain my views on what morals I think come to mind with each character I analyse. I will conclude with what I think the moral message is that Priestly is trying to put across in the play of an inspector calls.

The play is about a family which to begin with are celebrating the engagement of Shelia (Mr. Birling’s daughter) and Gerald. As you get in to more depth of the play the Birling family are interrogated by mysterious inspector Goole and the family starts to reveal it’s true colours as it’s relationship deteriorates between family members, as we find out every member has something to do with the death of young working – class woman Eva Smith.

John Boynton Priestly the author of this interesting play was born in Bradford, Yorkshire on 13th September 1894. Sadly his mother and father died on the same year.

To begin with I will analyse Arthur Birling. He is very family orientated and dominating to his family “Yes, my dear, I know – I’m talking too much. But you youngsters just remember what I said”. Here we can see that Mr. Birling is taking charge over his family, he likes to have the last word so in a way he is very manipulative in the beginning of the play before we come across Inspector Goole.

As Mr. Birling is inspected by Inspector Goole his mood changes entirely “(angrily) Look here, Inspector I consider this uncalled – for and officious. I’ve half a mind to report you. I’ve told you all I know – and it doesn’t seem to me very important…” So from this quote you can see that whilst under interrogation Mr. Birling becomes aggressive, after going from his original perception of a family orientated man who was dominating. But now I see him as aggressive and defensive.

Towards the end of the play Mr. Birling again becomes a different person. Gerald says”... (he puts sown the telephone and looks at them) No girl has died in there today. Nobody’s been brought in after drinking disinfectant. They haven’t had a suicide for months”. Then Mr. Birling says “(triumphantly) there you are! Proof positive. The whole story’s just a lot of moonshine. Nothing but an elaborate sell!...” “Gerald, have a drink” So from analysing this we can see that again Mr. Birling is a changed person; he is relieved that no-one died from suicide and to suggest he is relieved he tells Gerald to have a drink.

Join now!

My moral for Mr. Birling is possibly the same for each character: Never judge a book by its cover. To begin with Mr. Birling is a relaxed family man, and a bit dominating. Then he is put under inspection and becomes very defensive and aggressive. And towards the end Mr. Birling is another changed man he’s happy again and celebrating the fact everyone has revealed their true colours (including) himself, and that perhaps everyone has learnt a new lesson in life.

I will now analyse Shelia: To begin with she comes across as very sweet and innocent “(quiet and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay