• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who is the real monster, Frankenstein or his creation?

Extracts from this document...


Who is the real monster, Frankenstein or his creation? Mary Shelly's Frankenstein is designed as a gothic horror novel but deals with serious moral issues. Written in 1818, a time when breakthroughs and discoveries in the scientific world were common and often of great importance, the book shows how desire for knowledge entwined with humanity's ability to quickly reject what seems ugly or that which they don't understand, can unfold into a tragic tale with several fatal altercations. Whilst playing the role of a negligent God, Victor Frankenstein brings into existence a hideous being, which he rejects at birth, his creation lacking teachings of moral values commits murder. But can either Frankenstein or his creation be named monsters for acting on strong human emotions? The book itself is written as a series of letters, by using this unique method we can more easily adjust to the story and feel more connected to the characters, this means we can better understand the motivations of Victor and his creation. The conventions of a gothic horror novel don't really permit the absence of a monster or source of evil. There needs to be something to fear and I believe Shelly wants us to instantly assume due to its vile complexion and grotesque figure that the creature is that. ...read more.


To then cower in fear at the sight of his creation was not the action of a professional scientist. Neither of these offences really justifies the name monster. Right from the moment of it's formation Frankenstein's creation is completely alienated. Is Shelley trying to portray his later actions as being acceptable due to this? There is only so much that can be learnt on moral issues through books alone, when completely by himself Frankenstein's creation has nobody to learn about right from wrong he is left to make up his own mind on what is acceptable behaviour. Also considering that the only humans he has come into contact with have rejected him based solely on his appearance, surely what little moral boundaries he decides will be reflective of the alienation and malice he has experienced in his life. In the nineteenth century people had very old-fashioned role on woman's role in life the belief was that their purpose was to be mothers. After Victor has "successfully" created life from cadavers he suffers a disturbing nightmare, which depicts his future wife Elizabeth transform into his dead mother. I believe this dream has a deeper meaning, by creating a way of producing life without the need of sexual reproduction he is getting rid of the need for a mother. ...read more.


The description of the place the monster dwells in as being baron and desolate helps to make him sound like more of a monster, as his home is reflective of his personality. This could be especially true for the cold harsh mountains which he roams, the fact that he can survive there alone makes him suited for being a monster or a wild beast. Is this Shelley trying to classify the creature's mental stability based on it's harsh surroundings? We must also definitely consider whether the creature's intelligence makes him more or less of a monster. Because we see the creature as becoming quite intelligent then we tend to use this as a reason to describe it as not being a monster but considering it has the mental capacity to understand the quality of life for the victim surely this would make his actions more monstrous. The creature is obviously intelligent, possibly more so than his creator. It is this ability that could condemn him to the title monster. Also when the creature makes malicious threats towards Victor, though they are worded to perfection and a good example of his vast vocabulary, they still remain brutally hateful "I will work at your destruction, nor finish until I desolate your heart, so that you will curse the hour of your birth." He poses far greater a threat with a brain to match his incredible brawn. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Who is the Real Monster in Frankenstein, Victor or his Creation?"

    4 star(s)

    Gothic writers tend to explore subjects like the dark side of the human mind. 'It was the secrets of heaven and earth that I desired to learn' Victor Frankenstein was the real monster in this novel. This is evident in his ignorance to the consequences of his actions.

  2. Who is the REAL monster in Frankenstein?

    All Frankenstein wanted to do was save mankind from death and illness, and that was why he had begun his, "project." He said he wanted to, '...pour a torrent of life into our dark world.' All he wanted was to put smiles onto sad and lonely faces.

  1. "Who is the real monster in Frankenstein: Victor, the Creature or Society?

    When the Creature was in its infancy, in a manner of speaking, it was met with hatred from the villages it set foot in. It was not the adults alone who found the Creature abhorrent but also the children:

  2. Frankenstein - Who is the real monster?

    At the beginning of chapter five Frankenstein portrays himself as a hero as he says "I beheld the accomplishment of my toils" and also " the wretch whom with such infinite pains and cares I had endeavoured to form". This suggests that Frankenstein looked beyond the horror of what he

  1. Frankenstein - From your reading of the novel, which character do you think is ...

    Victor imagines how, 'A new species would bless me as its creator and source... No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as I should deserve theirs.' This shows that Victor's main crime is not what he had done, but what he failed to do.

  2. How far do Walton's letters prepare us for the tale which is about to ...

    However, his beautiful surroundings are also very perilous, and end up being the reason he has to return. Walton describes Frankenstein as completely broken-down by grief, but still able to appreciate the natural beauty of the world around him, which seems remarkable.

  1. Is Frankensteins creation is a creature or a monster?

    Shelley presents the creation as a creature at this point; as vulnerable as a new born child. We feel very sorry for him because he's been rejected. At this point Frankenstein appears to be the monster because he is being callous turning his back on his responsibility.

  2. Who, in your opinion, is the real monster of Mary Shelleys Frankenstein. Is it ...

    There are also striking parallels between her family life and that of Victor. According to letters from Mary's father, her childhood was as pleasant as it could have been, where Victor states himself that "No human being could have passed a happier childhood than myself."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work