Who or what is responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet?

Authors Avatar

Who or what is responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet?

‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a play written by Shakespeare about a pair of “star-crossed lovers”-Romeo and Juliet.  It’s a tragedy, where Romeo the son of the Montague family and Juliet the daughter of the Capulet family, fall in love, but everything goes wrong for them and they kill themselves.  Prologues, like the one used at the beginning of Romeo and Juliet, were very popular in Elizabethan times.  The prologue tells us that the death of the ‘star-crossed lovers’ is the only way their ‘parents rage’ will end.  We see that they are always struggling to be happy and learn that fate and fortune will determine their future and fail in their hope for love.  The prologue is in sonnet form, which is often used with love poetry.  Shakespeare may have taken the story of Romeo and Juliet from the poem, the tragical history of ‘Romeus and Juliet’, written in 1562 by Arthur Brooke.  Although it could have been derived from the Greek, Xenophon.  The play was published in Quartos form in 1597, so it was probably written by Shakespeare a couple of years before.  The plays were sold for sixpence and were called Quartos because of the page size.  Many people in the Elizabethan era would have put the tragical deaths of Romeo and Juliet down to fate and fortune.  Although many people would now say that it is the family feud that leads to the deaths of the lovers.  I think the reason for their deaths is either just chance or the contribution of all the characters.

In the play, there is an on-going feud between the family of the Montagues and that of the Capulets.  The rivalry between the two families has been going on for such a long time that no one can remember how it started.  There is an ‘ancient grudge’ between the two families.  A reason for the feud could be that both of the families are ‘alike in dignity’.  This means they both have the same, being a large amount of pride, on their family names.  The only people from either family that aren’t and don’t really want to be part of the feud are Romeo and Juliet, as well as Benvolio.  We notice the feud in the first scene.  A fight breaks out in the streets of Verona between servants of the Montague and Capulet families.  The servants speak very coarsely.  Sampson and Gregory, who are the Capulet’s servants, joke about being better than the Montagues.  Then, two of Montague’s servants appear.  Sampson persuades Gregory to pick a fight with them.  All the servants are cowards, but then the heads of the families arrive, and Capulet calls for his ‘long-sword’.  Escales, the prince of Verona arrives. He is the representative of law and order in the play.  He stops the fighting and threatens that their ‘lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace’ if there is more fighting.  This is the first time in the play, that we see, what may be responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.  We see that the feud is to have a big effect.

Romeo is asked by the servant that cannot read to help him with the list of guests he has to invite to the Capulets’ ball.  The servant cannot read, but speaks in prose; this shows that he is of the lower class.  This is also what the servants speak at the beginning of the play, when they have the fight.  Romeo sees Rosaline’s name.  We know Romeo has courtly love with Rosaline as he understands she is not to be ‘hit with Cupid’s arrow’, but still can’t forget her.  Benvolio compares Rosaline with ‘all the admired beauties of Verona’.  He decides to go to the ball, as he is adamant that Rosaline is the only one that will suite him.  He is confused by the strange effect on him, ‘Is love a tender thing? It is too rough, / Too rude, too boisterous, and it pricks like thorn.’  If Rosaline had returned Romeo’s love, then maybe Romeo wouldn’t have met Juliet, and the pair wouldn’t have died.  They decide to gatecrash the party and Romeo falls in love with Juliet.  Tybalt who is the kinsman of Capulet and enemies of Romeo sees him at he ball and says that ‘by the stock and honour of my kin,/ To strike him dead, I hold it not a sin’.  However Capulet prevents Tybalt from hurting Romeo.  He does this as ‘Verona brags of him/ To be a virtuous and well-governed youth’.  Romeo and the other Montagues attending the party, is very provocative as it is still the same day as the fighting in the streets.  This is why Tybalt is so angry and takes out his revenge by trying to kill Romeo, but ending up killing Mercutio later on in the play.  Romeo doesn’t want to fight as he has just got married and doesn’t want any more trouble.  We see he doesn’t want to fight, when Romeo says ‘I do protest I never injured thee’.  If Tybalt hadn’t ended up killing Mercutio, Romeo would never have killed Tybalt.  This means, if Tybalt hadn’t killed Mercutio, Romeo wouldn’t have been banished and may even have ended up being happy with Juliet.  This can also be blamed on Benvolio, as he was the one that said to Romeo that he will weigh out Romeo’s love for Rosaline ‘against some other maid’ at the ‘feast’.  

Join now!

Romeo has a main advisor and two main friends.  These are Bevolio, Mercutio, who are his friends and Friar Lawrence, who is his advisor.  They also each contribute to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.  Benvolio is a close and sensitive friend of Romeo, who is sensible.  He advises Romeo that he should ‘forget to think of’ Rosaline ‘By giving liberty unto thine eyes’.  Romeo does this and meets Juliet.  Without Benvolio, Romeo and Juliet may not have met or at least could have met with more time.  Also, after the deaths of Mercutio and Tybalt, he is the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay