• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

Extracts from this document...


Richard Tandy November 2003 C/W1 Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain? After taking France in addition to his list of captured countries on mainland Europe, Adolf Hitler set his sights on Britain. After the success of Blitzkrieg, the evacuation of Dunkirk and the surrender of France, Britain was by herself. However, before Hitler could contemplate undertaking an invasion he was advised by his generals that Germany had to destroy the Fighter Command of the Royal Air Force in order to gain superiority in the air. This would in turn enable him to gain control of the English Channel in order to transfer the 160,000 German troops on the 2000 invasion barges, which had been assembled in German, French and Belgian harbors, over the channel to Britain unscaved. Between august and September in the summer of 1940, under the codename of operation sealion the planes of the German Luftwaffe attacked British airfields, ports and radar stations in an attempt to gain air superiority, while Britain was defended tenaciously by the Royal Air Force. This period of time became known as the Battle of Britain and remains one of the most famous battles of world war two, if Britain had lost, Germany would have invaded. After taking the captured European countries with no serious problems, Hitler expected that Britain too would be an easy target. However, against the odds Britain held out and resisted the German attack. In this essay I am going to examine how Britain managed to resist the Luftwaffe and as some would say, win the Battle of Britain. For this essay I will anylise the reasons for the British success under the four main categories of: tactics, technology, organization and preparation and personnel. For each category I will give numerous reasons to why Britain won the Battle of Britain. For example, under the category of technology I could say that one reason why Britain won the battle of Britain was because they had the services of the radar system. ...read more.


Designed by Robert Watson-Watt, it worked by bouncing a radio wave against an object and measuring its travel to provide targeting information. By the spring of 1940, fifty-one radar bases had been built around the coast of southern Britain. Although unreliable, it allowed the British to track the German raids and send the fighters to where they were needed. The British fighters could stay on the ground until the last minute, so constant patrols were not needed and the Germans lost the element of surprise, which in many ways made up for the lack of numbers on the British side. The Germans were never able to successfully take out Britain's radar chain, and this plays a big part in why they were never able to get the better of fighter command. The radar system was obviously an important and significant acquirement to the British effort and provided the RAF with a huge advantage over the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain. The main fighter planes of the RAF were the Supermarine Spitfire and the Hawker Hurricane. The Germans relied primarily on their Messcherschmitt fighters and their Junkers dive-bombers - the famed Stukas. At this time these aircraft were the best the respective sides could produce. Britain had a number of advantages over the Luftwaffe. The Hurricane and Spitfire were exceptional planes - capable of taking on the might of the Luftwaffe. In the Battle of Britain the RAF could have won because our fighter planes, the Spitfire and the Hurricane proved to be better then the German Messerschmitts. They easily outmatched the Luftwaffe's fighters. The Spitfire was faster and more manoeuvrable but the Hurricane carried slightly more ammunition, proposed a more stable gun platform and was lethal against the German bombers. At the start of world war two, Germany had 4,000 aircraft compared to Britain's front-line strength of 1,660. By the time of the fall of France, the Luftwaffe had 3,000 planes based in north-west Europe alone including 1,400 bombers, 300 dive bombers, 800 single engine fighter planes and 240 twin engine fighter bombers. ...read more.


In the end, Britain had a lot to be thankful for. The skill and determination of her pilots could not be underestimated, but luck played an even more important role. The weather, so often derided in England, caused more problems than the Luftwaffe could cope with. Yet, it was the unfortunate action of one German pilot that altered the whole pattern of the war, but saved the RAF. Hitler's ego got in the way and changed Germany's tactics just when they had the British were they wanted them. Ultimately, I think this was the main reason for Britain's success. Britain was apparently only twenty four hours away from defeat yet this incredible change of tactics gave the RAF time to regroup, repair airfields and train new pilots. Once they regrouped, the RAF could continue to hit the Luftwaffe without sustaining anything like the damage they had been suffering. They could keep hitting the Germans until they could no longer afford to take any more damage. Ultimately, it could be argued that the Germans lost the Battle of Britain rather than the British winning it because of this. However, while the Germans made tactical errors, it still took the bravery and ability of the RAF to exploit these mistakes and defeat the Germans for the first time in the war. The Battle of Britain was a turning point in the sense that it was the first time that German forces had been defeated. The survival of Britain meant that it could later be used as the staring point for the liberation of Europe. However, some historians now regard it as being of less importance from a military point of view. Hitler may well not have been able to invade Britain even if the Luftwaffe had been able to defeat Fighter Command. The German armed forces were completely unprepared for an invasion and Operation Sealion was opposed by all of the German High Command. Hitler lost interest in Britain in 1941 when he ordered Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    quickly march all the way back south without even getting a chance to rest. Harold did not get the help he needed when going into battle with William's army. He had asked the Earl of Mercia and the Earl of Northumberland but even though they began riding south to support him, they changed their minds halfway and returned back.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    Churchill's propaganda wasn't really a lie but more of an exaggeration of the truth. During the Battle of Britain, the British were preparing for a textbook example of Blitzkrieg defeat, and most people had realised that the situation was quite simple.

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    downfall in morale and the fact friends and family would have to watch each other die. The pal's battalions were given their first battlefield experience at the Somme and it was a horrific experience for most of them. The Somme is though of as a military catastrophe partly due to the battlefield experience.

  2. The Battle Of Hastings was in the year 1066, in the medieval times.The battle ...

    But sometimes Harold Godwinson can be cantankerous. Good Luck: Luckily, Harold Godwinson went to battle with Harold Hadraada and defeated Harold Hadraada. So then it will be easier for Harold Godwinson because that is Harold Hadraada out of the way so he won't be under pressure as much as before.

  1. Are knights and castles a sufficient explanation for Norman military success between 1066 and ...

    It could be said that the shield wall "acted as an immovable object against the unstoppable force of the Norman cavalry assault.4"During the battle, despite their apparent military advantages, made little headway until the Anglo- Saxons followed the phoney Norman retreat, this breaking their shield leaving them open to attack.

  2. 'Stalingrad was the most significant turning point of the war on the Eastern Front ...

    The sole way in which the battle was a military turning point is that it halted the Russian retreat out of Stalingrad. When they won, they could hold their ground, regroup and prepare to regain ground. Source D supports the view that it was a military turning point to a

  1. Why did the Royal Air Force win The Battle of Britain in 1940?

    Dowding was also a supporter of Radar (the German intelligence core took a long time to realise how important Radar was going to be in the future). This was a new and helpful mechanism, which worked by transmitting Radio waves out which, in turn, bounced off any object within a

  2. The Battle of Britain

    These speeches are primary first hand evidence from the Prime Minister. Its highly effective in reaching its wartime audience because it was what people wanted to hear and he captures and sets the mood. However its weaknesses do balance the strengths as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work