William Shakespeare-Romeo and Juliet-'Who or what was to blame for their deaths?'

Authors Avatar

        24/09/2007 10:16 PM

In this assignment I will discuss who was to blame for Romeo and Juliet’s death. To get a clear idea of each aspect, such as fate, chance, notorious feuds, adolescent passion and other character’s influences, I will explore and investigate the language, social issues and historical values of each argument.

The famous William Shakespeare between 1594 and 1595 wrote Romeo and Juliet. Set in 16th century Verona, a city in northern Italy, where a brutal feud between the Capulets and the Montagues were blazing. Romeo, a Montague; Juliet, a Capulet fell in love... Secrecy, passion then tragedy followed, but who or what was to blame?

The majority of people back in Shakespeare’s day believed in fate and that our lives were controlled by something outside ourselves. They believe we were controlled by fate or fortune. Some people, even nowadays believe in fate and fortune and whatever happens is meant to happen. The Elizabethans thought that every tiny little event or action pushed everything else along in a chain of events. People think they have a choice in what they do, but they don’t. So when Romeo and Juliet meet at the ball, it is meant to be, and thy are meant to fall in love.

Romeo and Juliet are referred to as ‘star crossed lovers’ which means that their destiny is written in the stars, like a horoscope nowadays. It means that they are meant to be together. Friar Lawrence warns that ‘violent delights have violent ends,’ which means that the violent feud between the Montagues and the Capulets will bring an end to Romeo and Juliet’s lives. Romeo is aware of fate and seems to be a strong believer of it. He often refers to the stars or fortune to describe his feelings. He says his future is ‘hanging in the stars,’ this means that his future has already been decided and is hidden in the stars. He doesn’t know what’s in store for him in the future. Romeo also refers himself as ‘fortune’s fool’,’ which means he is unlucky and isn’t in good fortune. The overall play makes us feel that there’s a sense of inevitability about it. In a way, we feel helpless and we feel we want to change certain events so that the ending could have been happier, but the play is about fate and fortune in order to adapt to the superstitious Elizabethan audience.

Join now!

Instead of fate and fortune, maybe chance had a part to play in Romeo and Juliet’s death. Maybe the whole play was ‘bad luck’ or just a series of unexplained accidents, with the accidental meeting of Peter carrying the Capulet’s invitation list which resulted in Romeo going to his enemies ball and meeting his one true love, Juliet. Fate or chance? Or what about the non-delivery of Friar Lawrence’s letter informing Romeo of Juliet’s plan but of course the letter never arrived which resulted in both their deaths. Fate or chance? Or was Mercutio’s death just an unhappy chance? Elizabethan ...

This is a preview of the whole essay