With close reference to the texts studied, compare and contrast the ways in which writers convey character, setting and atmosphere.

Authors Avatar

With close reference to the texts studied, compare and contrast the ways in which writers convey character, setting and atmosphere.

        In this essay I will be comparing the ways in which Susan Hill and Charles Dickens convey character, setting and atmosphere in “I’m the King of the Castle” and “Great Expectations”. From “I’m the King of the Castle” I will mostly be focusing on extracts from chapter one, from “Great Expectations” I will focus mainly on chapters one and eight.

        The opening of “I’m the King of the Castle” focuses on two characters, Mr. Hooper (Joseph) and his son, Edmund Hooper. The opening of “Great Expectations” is describing Pip; following this he describes an escaped convict.

        Pip is the narrator in “Great Expectations” so everything is from his point of view. This is slightly different to “I’m the King of the Castle” as narration is third person and is sometimes describing Mr. Hooper and at other times is describing Edmund. This is very effective because both points of view are portrayed although it sometimes makes the plot hard to follow because it’s difficult to tell who is being talked about.

Join now!

        While reading the books I noticed many similarities as well as differences between Pip and Edmund. They are both of the same age and both have lost their mothers. One of the main differences is that Edmund had been brought up in a loving atmosphere with everything he could want, where as Pip had been bought up “by hand” and never made to be felt wanted. I think Edmund is very much like Estella, as they are stubborn, scornful and disagreeable. In “I’m the King of the Castle” this is shown by the way that Mr. Hooper talks to Edmund, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay