With close reference to three or more key moments from ‘The Crucible’ discuss how Millers writing is both dramatic and relevant to a modern audience

Authors Avatar

Chris Rose                5 February 2002

GCSE English Literature Major Coursework Assignment

20th Century Drama

With close reference to three or more key moments from ‘The Crucible’ discuss how Millers writing is both dramatic and relevant to a modern audience


Arthur Miller was born in New York in 1915 and has written many successful books and plays. ‘The Crucible’ was one of the major plays of the 20th century and was written by him in response to the anti-communist hearings made by Senator Joe McCarthy. Arthur Miller himself was called before the American Congress Committee in 1956 and found himself in much the same dilemma as John Proctor. He was asked for a list of people who had attended a former meeting. He denied to produce a list and was fined for contempt of congress.

‘The Crucible’ is a play about a love lost teenager (Abigail) who is rejected by the married man she is in love with (John Proctor). In her revenge she aims to win him over but instead rips up the rigid structure of Salem and fans a complex society into an ignorant hysteria. Ironically, the one she aims to get back, John Proctor, is hanged.

I believe that ‘The Crucible’ is relevant to a modern audience because of the McCarthy hearings that were taking place at the time, and many other events in history since then that have occurred, ones in which groups of human beings are persecuted for there race, religion, or political beliefs; such as the holocaust. The McCarthy hearings were in response to irrational fear of communism and the Salem witch trials were in response to irrational fear of witches. But in reality, it was fear of people different from them.

One strong theme that is contained in ‘The Crucible’ is the idea of conformity, which the audience can draw parallels to. In ‘The Crucible’, the need for the characters to conform to the rules of the church and that of its minister are evident. They find themselves in a very difficult situation: they must either turn their backs on what they believe in and lie by admitting to having “had relations with the devil” and conform to the churches standards or they must follow there individual beliefs and refuse to lie. The audience can relate to this because they find themselves in situations like this everyday, Miller makes the audience decide where they would draw the line. Was a person “bad” if they didn’t live by the rules of the Catholic Church? Or was it all right for an individual to have there own interpretation of these rules?

Join now!

‘The Crucible’ attacks the poor balance of power we are surrounded by in society today. We are shown how much affect a single entity can have on a society, if they define what beliefs people live by. During the Salem witch trials, religion was the answer to everything that people didn’t understand. Therefore ministers and priests were the only ones who were “qualified” to interpret the rules of religion and God. Nobody could have been more powerful than them in Salem, as nobody would dare question the voice of God. To this very day, many people are afraid to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay