• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to Act I scene I and Act III scene I of Shakespeare's 'Romeo And Juliet', how successful do you feel that Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Lurhman have been in interpreting the theme of feuding in their respective films?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Romeo And Juliet With reference to Act I scene I and Act III scene I of Shakespeare's 'Romeo And Juliet', how successful do you feel that Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Lurhman have been in interpreting the theme of feuding in their respective films? Which of these do you prefer and why? In this essay I will suggest how each of the directors use music, camera shots, language, mood, clothing, special effects and location settings to demonstrate the build up of tension between the house of Montague and the house of Capulet, with correlation to Act I scene I and Act III scene I. I will compare the films and in conclusion voice my opinion on each. In the very first part of act I scene I the first people we are introduce to are Benvolio, Sampson and Gregory. We follow them as they drive their car through the streets of fair Verona being boisterous but entertaining so we are immediately on their side as the mood becomes more serious as the Montagues arrive. In both films, each director uses a public place for Act I scene i. Franco Zeffirelli uses a market place where as Baz Lurhman uses a petrol station. ...read more.

Middle

This may be a metaphor for cowboys and Indian who are questionably the most memorable adversaries in history, which may be trying to say that the Montagues and Capulets are following in their footsteps. I will now discuss how each director uses S.F.X (special effects) and how each director chooses to position his camera. Zeffirelli uses mainly wide screen shots of large groups of people. At the beginning of Act III Scene I he shoots Romeo and Mercutio talking in a court yard and even though its only the two of them in the shot, Zeffirelli still opts for a wider picture as if there was a huge crowd. As Zeffirelli's film was created quite a few years before Baz Lurhman's, there is obviously not going to be as many special effects although, he does use some mild stunts like sword fights and Mercutio falling down a flight of stairs as he dies. Baz Lurhman juxtaposes the sense of overwrought with slapstick humour. Lurhman uses a wider variation of special effects and he is definitely more creative with his camera shots. He uses a range of close ups (shots of a largish part of someone's body e.g: face, legs, arms) and extreme close ups (shots of a small part of someone's body e.g: eyes, mouth, feet, hands). ...read more.

Conclusion

Mercutio decides he will fight on behalf of Romeo but then Romeo arrives. He refuses to fight Tybalt. Tybalt will not let him get out of it. Romeo is kicked to the floor and hit by Tybalt until he pulls out his gun on Tybalt, although he doesn't pull the trigger. Mercutio hits Tybalt so they duel. Romeo intervenes as in Zeffirelli's film, and Mercutio is stabbed. He goes to the top of a stage and shouts "a plague on both your houses". This shows he blames both houses for his death. Even though Mercutio isn't a Capulet Tybalt killed him because he is associated with the Capulets. In conclusion, my opinion is that Baz Lurhman's version of Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' is more successful in proving to us how tense the feud between the houses actually is. I believe this because the actors are more emotional whilst they are speaking and they are more enthusiastic in each mood type for example act I scene I, at the garage, Benvolio and Tybalt sound as if they are capable of killing each other with speech. I believe the reason for my opinion is that Franco Zeffirreli's film was made so long ago that the acting which may have seemed very serious in it's time now seems almost pathetic as the tension takes a long time to be shown. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    Romeo is a lot involved in this scene compared to the Franco Zeffirelli. Also I think we feel more sympathetic towards him as he is really trying to make peace with Tybalt and as a result he ends up injured.

  2. Using camera angles, soundtrack, costume, props and setting describe the world Baz Lurhman has ...

    The camera then focuses on Tybalt's face as he is introduced as the 'Prince of Cats' implying how powerful he is and the fact that his primacy allows him to have 9 lives, resembling a cat. His movements are slow but calculated.

  1. How does Shakespeare achieve drama and tension in Act 3 scene 5 (line 65 ...

    and many more. He suggests her to be unworthy. He then begins to grow abusive and talks about Juliet as if she is a horse to be tamed. Lord Capulet promotes more abuse 'how now, how now? Chop-logic! What is this?'

  2. How does Shakespeare make us feel increasingly sympathetic for Juliet in Act three scene ...

    By using metaphors it just makes the language so much more pleasant to read. Her and her daughter now have a conversation with double meanings throughout it, she just still keeps to the assumption that she is weeping for Tybalt.

  1. Compare & Contrast The Ways In Which, 'Baz Luhrmann' & 'Franco Zeffirelli' Present Scene ...

    The music associated with them is cleverly adapted into a very different genre of a Western movie. Zeffirelli fails to do this; instead he incorporates sounds of a market day in the daily life in Verona. Baz Luhrmann illustrates The Capulet's 'Prince of Cats'; Tybalt is shown as a show-off but with skill that is quite daunting.

  2. How effectively do Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli interpret Act I Scene VI when ...

    to show that she is doing good, when Romeo suggests things that Juliet feels would be wrong the light dims a little. Juliet moves into the light once Romeo has stopped talking to show that she is thinking good thoughts.

  1. Do you think that Baz Luhrmann or Franco Zeffirelli is more successful in their ...

    The Zeffirelli explanation for Balthasar getting to Romeo before Friar John is perfectly reasonable and perhaps saves some time in the film as Zeffirelli is able to leave out scene two of act five. The Zeffirelli film also leaves out Romeo going to the apothecary to get the poison with which he kills himself.

  2. How does Shakespeare create and build an atmosphere of tension and horror in act ...

    Romeo is banished, he will no longer be able to visit Juliet, which creates frustration and tension between their relationship, as we find out later on in the play. I think when the Prince banished Romeo, the audience, in those days, would have been disappointed because they would have liked

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work