With reference to Act I scene I and Act III scene I of Shakespeare's 'Romeo And Juliet', how successful do you feel that Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Lurhman have been in interpreting the theme of feuding in their respective films?

Authors Avatar

Romeo And Juliet

With reference to Act I scene I  and Act III scene I of

Shakespeare's 'Romeo And Juliet',

how successful do you feel that Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Lurhman have been

 in interpreting the theme of feuding in their respective films?

Which of these do you prefer and why?  

In this essay I will suggest how each of the directors use music, camera shots, language, mood, clothing, special effects and location settings to demonstrate the build up of tension between the house of Montague and the house of Capulet, with correlation to Act I scene I and Act III scene I. I will compare the films and in conclusion voice my opinion on each.

        In the very first part of act I scene I the first people we are introduce to are Benvolio, Sampson and Gregory. We follow them as they drive their car through the streets of fair Verona being boisterous but entertaining so we are immediately on their side as the mood becomes more serious as the Montagues arrive. In both films, each director uses a public place for Act I scene i. Franco Zeffirelli uses a market place where as Baz Lurhman uses a petrol station. This tells us that both the Montagues and the Capulets will quarrel regardless of the surrounding people. Towards the end of the scene each director shows us the rioting in the streets surrounding the area of the feud. Franco Zeffirelli uses one continuous shot of the riots. Baz Lurhman uses a number of different shots and camera angles. Franco Zeffirelli's film is harder to understand as Benvolio, Sampson, and Gregory are Montagues and Tybalt, Abram, and Balthasar are the Capulets whereas in the Baz Lurhman film they are the other way around. 

         Both of the directors have opted for their characters to speak the dialect spoken by Shakespeare although the characters speak it in very different ways. In Zeffirelli's version there is more  emphasis on the words so it's harder to understand what is being said, due to the fact that actions speak louder than words so to speak. The characters also speak quite fast which doesn't make it any easier. This lessons the impact that the speech was meant to have, therefore does not create the desired affect and lacks a sense of tension between the houses i.e. there is no indication of serious quarrelling between the houses. In Lurhman's version the focus is more on the drama which is a lot easier to comprehend as the facial expressions are over exaggerated and the characters gesticulate non-stop so it is easier to tell when the mood changes.

Join now!

In Zeffirelli's version background music is scarce excepting the introduction where jovial majestic music is played as a narrator dictates over it. It has a very light hearted, upper class feel to it. Baz Lurhman decided to play classical choir music behind the narrator of the prologue and faint but effective sound effects i.e. cars shouting, club scenes etc. this has a very serious feel to it. In Act I scene i, the first people who we are introduced to are the Capulet males, Benvolio, Sampson and Gregory. They are standing up in the car whilst driving fast as 'gang ...

This is a preview of the whole essay