• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Write an analysis of character and language in these scenes. Relating it to the themes and ideas in the rest of the play

Extracts from this document...


Write an analysis of character and language in these scenes. Relating it to the themes and ideas in the rest of the play 'Julius Caesar' was written during the year 1597. The play involves a highly respected senator, Brutus, who decides to join the conspiracy to kill Julius Caesar, in the effort to keep republicanism intact. Brutus believes that if Julius Caesar is allowed to live, Caesar will become king and turn the government into a monarchy. Brutus, Cassius, and the other conspirators kill Julius Caesar. Yet they find Antony, a loyalist of Caesar, seeks revenge on them. A key feature of a tragic hero is the fact that a tragic hero must be a high-standing individual in society. The tragic hero must not deserve his punishment for the play to be a tragedy. Also, a tragedy happening to someone in high authority, will affect not only the single person but also society as a whole. Brutus is a tragic hero because he was noble, well reflected and high in society, yet because he compromised his honour by alliance with dishonourable men his downfall was assured. Brutus believed that the Romans needed him as the leader to assassinate Caesar, partly because of Cassius' urgings and forged works, but also because he feared Caesar's ambition. Brutus' trusting attitude toward Antony is an example of one of his naivety. ...read more.


"As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him.". Brutus is appealing to the crowds wish to be free men without Caesar rather than be slaves under Caesar. However, Brutus does not acknowledge any examples to support his allegation of Caesar's ambition. He instead leaves his statements "open-ended". Brutus seems to expect the crowd to believe his arguments just because he is honourable. This is not a wise choice because the crowd is too emotionally shocked, about Caesar's murder. Brutus fails to incorporate emotion in his speech. Many critics believe that this is the factor that leads to the mutiny against him. Brutus seems to have no other supporting arguments for his case, so he asks the crowd questions like; who is so corrupt to want to be a slave under Caesar's rule rather than be free without him. When Brutus starts judging the crowd, he begins to lose his effect on them. "Who is here so base that would rather be a bondsman? If any speak, for him have I offended? Who is here so vile that would not be Roman? If any speak, for him have I offended? Who here is so rude that would not be Roman? ...read more.


Every time the will is mentioned a little more information is surrendered, just to whet their Roman appetite. Also, Antony knows exactly how the Roman mob thinks; he is always a step ahead of them. Antony toys with the emotion of the crowd and drags them to both ends of the spectrum. The most interesting difference in these two funeral orations is the tone used by both speakers. Antony speaks as more of a friend to the people than a powerful leader. Antony speaks to the people as if they are his equals; he respects the intelligence of the common people to understand a speech given in verse. Antony's opening contrasts in meaning, "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears" (Act III, scene ii, line 75). In just this one line, Antony uses Brutus's words to his advantage by changing them to make himself sound friendlier. By the very first word of Antony's speech, one can infer than he is about to give a humbling oration; he uses the ethical appeal to convince the people to believe in his cause rather than Brutus's. Finally, Antony uses sarcasm to rip down any respect the Roman people may have built for Brutus and the conspirators. In his funeral oration, Antony insults Brutus ten times by stating that he is "an honorable man" (Act III, scene ii, line 84) in a tone of biting mockery, therefore questioning Brutus's credibility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    Here there is a patterning in the speech as he states that 'Brutus says that he was ambitious and Brutus is an honourable man', he then reminds them of the good Caesar did to prove that he was not ambitious, for example refusing the crown and then finally asks them 'was this ambition?'.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 Scene ...

    The intention of this is for emphasis on the word "unkind" to portray how cruel and heartless Brutus is for stabbing Caesar when he is "Caesar's angel" and "how dearly Caesar lov'd him". Antony claims that he is "no orator, as Brutus is," he has "neither wit, nor words, nor

  1. What do we learn about the differences in character between Brutus and Antony from their ...

    Instead, he hints at the fact that Ceasar was not ambitious. "The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious; If it were so, it was a grievous fault." "But Brutus says that he was ambitious And Brutus is an honourable man" "He hath brought many captives home to Rome,

  2. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    that know-one could disagree with 'I thrice presented him with a kingly crown Which he did thrice refuse, was this ambition?' This is a rhetorical question and is a clever way of making the crowd think about Mark Antony's speech and thoughts.

  1. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    The will is again mentioned by Antony, "You have forgot the will I told you of." He does this because plebeians have forgotten because of their anger. Antony also makes sure that the fury of the plebeians is supported by knowledge of the will.

  2. A Comparative Study of the Two Funeral Speeches from Act II, Scene II of ...

    They can only respond, "None Brutus, none." That is, none are offended, they do not disagree or argue with his words or his actions. Mark Antonys speech focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar.

  1. With close reference to the text explain how Mark Antony manipulates the crowd after ...

    "Look, in this place ran Cassius' dagger through: see what a rent the envious Casca made." Antony mentions how close Brutus was to Caesar, "For Brutus as you know was Caesars' angel." "This was the unkindest cut of all, for when the noble Caesar saw him stab, in gratitude more strong than traitors arms."

  2. Explore the differences in character between Brutus and Cassius by examining their actions, what ...

    Brutus tells Cassius to get over it and to get on with his life. He could be hiding the grief or just concentrating on what to do with the rest of his own life. You can tell that Cassius is very weak and Brutus a lot tougher because Brutus was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work