• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

Comparing 2 Shopping Centres

Extracts from this document...


Comparing 2 Shopping Centres Aims and Hypotheses AIMS 1. To find out which shopping centre has the greatest variety and number of shops and services 2. To determine the quality of the shopping centres 3. To discover how large the catchment areas are of both shopping centres 4. To find out the proportion of convenience good shops to comparison good shops in the shopping centres 5. To determine as to whether pedestrian flow varies within each shopping centre HYPOTHESES 1. Chester-le-Street has both a greater variety of shops and services and a larger number of shops and services than Birtley 2. Birtley has less comparison good shops than Chester-le-Street 3. The quality of both shopping centres could be improved by the provision of further amenities 4. Chester-le-Street has a much larger cachtment area than Birtley 5. Pedestrian flow varies considerably along the main shopping street in each centre Organisation of Fieldwork This is how my coursework is going to be organised :- Method Hypothesis 1 - results and analysis Hypothesis 2 - results and analysis Hypothesis 3 - results and analysis Hypothesis 4 - results and analysis Hypothesis 5 - results and analysis Conclusion Method In order to investigate my aims and hypothesis, the following was carried out :- We collected data from Chester-le-Street and Birtley. We did this on the morning of 22nd June 2000 in Birtley, and on the morning of 28th June 2000 in Chester-le-Street. I worked with James Moffat and Christopher Fullard. To compare the situations of Birtley and Chester-le-Street, see figure 1, the map on page 10. Exactly the same methods of data collection was carried out at each centre. I collected data for the hypothesis relating to 'types and variety of shops� by visiting Birtley and Chester-le-Street and walking along their respective shopping centres, which is shown highlighted in yellow on figures 2 and 3 on pages 11 and 12. ...read more.


However, I don�t think that my investigations proved without doubt that my hypothesis has been true. This is because that I didn�t carry out my survey across the whole of Birtley or Chester-le-Street. Hypothesis 2 My hypothesis was that Birtley has less comparison good shops than Chester-le-Street. A convenience goods shop is a shop that sells everyday goods that you wouldn�t expect people to compare prices between shops, for example a bakery. A comparison goods shop is a shop that sells expensive products that you would probably compare with other similar type shops, for example an electronic appliances store. My results seem to back up that hypothesis, because, as figure 11 shows, Birtley has 28 comparison shops compared to Chester-le-Streets 55 comparison shops. That means that 39% of Birtley�s shops are comparison shops, while 50% of the shops in Chester-le-Street are comparison shops. I think that my results prove that Chester-le-Street has more comparison shops because Birtley is mainly for Birtley residents to do their day-to-day shopping, while Chester-le-Street is more likely to have people coming from other towns or villages especially to buy more expensive products, for example a television. My original hypothesis, which was that Birtley has less comparison goods shops than Chester-le-Street was correct. However, I don�t think that my investigation has proved without doubt that my hypothesis is true. This is because I believe that my fieldwork is limited as we only surveyed the main shopping centres of the respective towns, and not any shops in other parts of either Birtley or Chester-le-Street. Hypothesis 3 My hypothesis was that the quality of both shopping centres could be improved by the provision of further amenities. My results do back up my hypothesis, as they both did not score brilliantly on the questionnaire which was carried out. Although Chester-le-Street performed better than Birtley, as can be seen from the two graphs, it only scored 1,865 points out of a possible 5,000 points. Birtley didn�t even get half, scoring 1,454 out of 5,000. ...read more.


I think that my results take this pattern because the majority of shoppers are gravitated towards the larger shops. Point 9 is the busiest in Birtley, and that is directly next to a large Safeways for example. There are no shops next to point 1 in Birtley, and that�s why so few people pass by. I think it is difficult to say whether my original hypothesis has been proved true or false. This is because although Chester-le-Street�s pedestrian flow is varied considerably, Birtley�s is generally even throughout apart from a few exceptions, which are points 9, 13 and 1. I think my results could have been improved by staying at our points for longer. This is because people who were at work while we were doing our pedestrian flow count may of gone to different places. For example, if the survey were done at night, the points nearby to pubs might have been busier, or if it were done during lunchtime, bakers and takeaways may have been busier. Conclusion I think that my coursework has proved that Chester-le-Street has a greater variety and number of shops, and also a better quality shopping centre than Birtley. This is why I believe that Chester-le-Street has a larger catchment area than Birtley. Another thing I have found is that Birtley has less comparison goods shops in proportion to convenience goods shops compared to Chester-le-Street. This, in my opinion, is another reason why more people shop at Chester-le-Street than Birtley. I think that my project has been done fairly well, although I would of change some things if I could. One thing I would of changed is the amount of people interviewed for the questionnaires, because only about 140 people were interviewed in each town, and that is a tiny amount compared with the populations of both Birtley and Chester-le-Street, so I cannot be sure that our findings were representative of everybody�s views. I would also of preferred to have been given more time to do data collection, as I did have to work very efficiently to get everything done in time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Human Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Human Geography essays

  1. Investigating the Spheres of influence between two major shopping centres.

    This also forms part of my secondary data. I also have a newspaper article below showing the dedication that Marks and Spencer's appear to have made towards the new centre at Castlepoint. The cutting was taken from the Daily Echo, Saturday May 17th, 2003: A quote from Cllr John Millward, Bournemouth Borough Council: In a short telephone conversation

  2. Sphere of influence map.

    Together we interviewed Mr. Thompson who works for the Cambridge City Planning Department. Below are the questions and answers as a result of this interview: Q. Is Coral Park going to become a new shopping development? A. Yes indeed. Work is already underway. Q.

  1. GCSE Geography Settlement Coursework

    This would make the results represent a true value of the amount of people in each settlement. > Ask the questionnaires at a number of times during the day, in both settlements, to compare when people visit each settlement and how far they travel for each time of day.

  2. Geography Fieldwork - The effects of Tourism in Keswick

    makes the assumption that it is more worthwhile to maintain the lower parts of the walk than the higher parts. Also it is harder for the council to maintain the higher parts, as getting heavy rocks to the top of the slope would require a lot more labour than bringing

  1. Geography Coursework

    I could have gone during the weekend where there will be a variety of age groups however I cannot force people to answer my questionnaire. Pedestrian Density count Although it is still a school day and during working hours there is still a copious amounts of people.

  2. Windsor Investigation

    It would have been useful to visit at a different time of year, say for example Christmas, to see if Windsor is just as good an attraction then. I also think that the questions we asked could have been more detailed and specific in terms of what we were trying to find out.

  1. Llandudno fieldwork

    pier, shops, top quality entertainment in the magnificent 1500-seat North Wales Theatre, excellent restaurants, trams, a dry ski slope and lovely beaches. The 2,295 foot long Llandudno Victorian Pier, greatly admired by Sir John Betjeman, was built in 1878. Aim of Study During the fieldtrip to Llandudno, my general aim

  2. "The great success of out of town shopping centres like Meadowhall has been because ...

    Shops can be placed into a hierarchy based upon the services they provide. At the bottom of the hierarchy are small shops selling low order goods, At the top are shops selling high order goods. A shopping hierarchy puts shopping centres in order of importance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work