• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Delimiting the CBD of Stamford. Evaluation In general, the investigation has been a success. The most of the data collected agrees with the hypotheses and the CBD has been delimited without great difficulty.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluation In general, the investigation has been a success. The most of the data collected agrees with the hypotheses and the CBD has been delimited without great difficulty. The occasionally anomalies were easy to recognize and most could be explained. However, as with any projects, there are limitations which prevented the results from being perfect. There are four main factors which restricted the degree of accuracy of my project: 1. Limitation of time and resources 2. Pilot Errors 3. Survey Error 4. Temporal factors Limitation of time and resources This is perhaps the most fundamental problem faced with all projects. The amount of time and resources often prevents accuracy improvements upon the results. In this particular project, this has become even more significant as a proper investigation on Stamford's CBD would require a lot more resources and time. Firstly, the data collection is done by a class of around 20 students over one morning. Although Stamford is a relatively small settlement, the data collected by such a small group of people over a short period of time is barely representative enough in delimiting the CBD of the whole of Stamford, despite the use of secondary data. ...read more.

Middle

This error is diminished by speeding up the data collection and shortening the time difference between the data collection at various points. Pilot Errors The students were split into different groups for the data collection. For a group of students this size, there would undoubtedly be some mistakes among certain groups, such as miscounting the number pedestrians, or missing out CCTV camera because it was hard to spot. However, these individual mistakes are unlikely to be significant, as this project is more concerned with the general picture. The major source of pilot errors came from the scoring of shopping quality and street appearance. The scoring system is highly subjective and the scoring guidelines were not specific enough. For example, descriptions were only given to the top and bottom score from 1-6. This may result in a high percentage error, as some students might consider a place to be 3, while others might consider it to be 4. This is a significant 33% error. This error could be slightly reduced by using better guidelines with clear descriptions for each score, although subjective data collections such as the scores for street appearance and shopping quality would still have a greater error than non-subjective data such as pedestrian counts. ...read more.

Conclusion

Temporal factors The temporal factors made the least contribution to the error in this project. The weather was fine on the day of data collection, thus preventing any anomalies as a result of bad weather conditions. The day chosen, 15th September, was a normal weekday without any significant special events, which again increases the accuracy of the data collection. However, it does cause a small error for street appearance due to the first days the streets were cleaned. Streets which had just been cleaned on 14th September would appear to be better in Street appearance than streets which had not been cleaned recently, although it does not necessarily mean that they are normally cleaner. Summary A rough estimation of the CBD of Stamford has been delimited rather successfully using limited amount of data. Although there is a lot of room for improvement, most requires extra time, effort and resources which are not necessarily needed for a project at GCSE level. It is not a very accurate estimation and is definitely not commercially viable, however, it does give a general idea of the CBD of Stamford. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Human Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Human Geography essays

  1. Geography Investigation

    I have made a null hypothesis for this objective. The hypothesis is that there will be no land-use zoning or pattern to the layout of land-uses in Swanage. The town will bear no resemblance to the traditional models of urban morphology.

  2. An investigation to find the centre of Huntingdon's CBD.

    benedicts was comparatively lower than it was at other sites so I don't believe that this is the centre either. Chequer's Court did have a high pedestrian count but the buildings were built at 1950-1990 and as towns grow from the centre I don't think that this can be the centre.

  1. To create three different hypotheses related to tourism and tourists in Dubai that can ...

    Also, too many questions are answered in yes and no. If I leave it like this my data presentation will be very simple and I will not be able to deeply analyze my data. (Pilot)Geography Questionnaire 1) Are you here as a * Businessman * Tourist * Both 2)

  2. An Attempt to Delimit the C.B.D of Stamford.

    Public transport is concentrated as there is a convergence of bus routes going into the C.B.D so the number of vehicles most probably decreases as we enter the C.B.D and increases as we edge away from it. There will be very few residents in the C.B.D, which is limited to only a few luxury flats.

  1. Method, Data Interpretation and Evaluation for 'How Tourism Has Changed Hawkshead'

    1. The attractiveness of the buildings 2. The car park facilities available 3. Toilet availability 4. The pedestrianised village centre 5. The well kept gardens and hanging baskets 6. The shops for tourists 7. The shops for locals 8. The narrow pavements 9. The coach parking facilities 10.

  2. GCSE Geography Settlement Coursework

    > Central Oxford is more accessible, route wise. > Oxford has more tourism (e.g. Ashmolean Museum, Randolf Hotel, University buildings, the Carfax Tower, the Bodleian Library, the Oxford camera, and the Sheldonian Theatre etc). > Oxford has more entertainment (e.g.

  1. Geography Project GCSE

    For example a Village shop, in which within the Hierarchy would be classed at Local level could have a threshold of 400 shoppers, a Supermarket could have a threshold of 50,000+ shoppers and a Hypermarket could have a threshold of 70,000+ shoppers.

  2. The aim of this project is to delimit the CBD of Stamford.

    Final Delimitation of Stamford CBD core* *Used a map obtained from www.multimap.com Acknowledgments Thanks should be given to the group and all the effort they have put into this project. I also thank Lincolnshire police for the Crime Data and Experian for the goad map, www.voa.gov.uk for the rateable index

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work