• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How are new technologies being used in disaster zones?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How are new technologies being used in disaster zones? In this essay, I am going to look at technologies which aid areas which are frequently hit by seismic activity. In particular, I have chosen to take a look at measures taken before and after an earthquake in a MEDC (the earthquake and resulting tsunami on 11th of March, 2011, off the coast of Japan). In order to compare the two countries, I am going to attempt to answer the questions listed below: * What technologies were available to forewarn the disaster? Were they used? * Were any building techniques or materials been used in this area to limit damage? * Were technologies used to aid people? After covering the points, I am going to attempt to find out whether these technologies had a large impact on the potential damage and death toll. ...read more.


This sent warnings to many different countries that would be affected by the tsunami. Were any building techniques or materials been used in this area to limit damage? In Japan, there are very strict building codes in order to make buildings ?earthquake proof? (in reality, even the most well designed building could be damaged in a very strong earthquake). Buildings are designed with deep foundations and large shock absorbers, which allow the building to move and flex independently of the ground. Many modern Japanese buildings have designs based off traditional pagodas and temples. These buildings were very flexible because they were made of timber, which is not as rigid as other materials, such as bricks. However, modern constructions are on a far larger scale, and concrete reinforced with steel is usually used instead. In some taller buildings (for example, the Tokyo Sky Tree, scheduled to be finished in late 2011), there is a tripod-like base which allows for flexibility and stability. ...read more.


Conclusion I think that these technologies had a significant impact on the death toll and damage caused, because stronger buildings allow people to remain unharmed within them. The EEW could prevent any extra accidents from occurring when regarding trains and other large machinery. However, these solutions would not be practical in an LEDC, because the building regulations are usually not as strict. Even if building restrictions were stricter in LEDCs, the majority of the population would not be able to afford to build or design buildings that are as advanced as the earthquake proof buildings. The same is true for an EEW, because fewer people own mobile phones and televisions where there is less wealth, so it would not reach as wide an audience. Some things are probably easier to achieve for an LEDC, such as seawalls, because they are relatively inexpensive. In my opinion, more money from aid should go into the prevention and minimisation of damage and death caused by disasters, as less will have to be spent on the relief effort. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Human Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Human Geography essays

  1. The Kashmir earthquake

    Heavy monsoon rains and land slides proposed a threat to those in mountainous areas blocking road access causing around 40, 000 people to leave there homes. 3 million people were left homeless as a result of the earthquake. Damaged water systems left lack of clean drinking water and food distribution and marketing systems were badly disrupted leaving people starving.

  2. Energy assessment for Japan

    It also doesn't produce smoke or carbon dioxide, so it does not contribute to the greenhouse effect. What's also good about it is it produces huge amounts of energy from small amounts of fuel. It produces small amounts of waste.

  1. "What are the characteristics of Garstang's functional zones?"

    What is the pattern of EQA scores across the town, and how does the pattern relate to the different functional zones found? 7) What is the town's pattern of Pedestrian Flow Measurements and of Traffic Flow Measurements, and how can the two patterns be related?

  2. What should planners in the new Millenium learn from the redevelopment of the London ...

    The Docks were poorly managed, and so the workers did not have a good relationship with Port of London Authority. The below table shows when each dock opened, and when they closed: OPENED CLOSED St Katherine's 1828 1969 West India 1832 1980 Millwall 1866 1980 Albert 1880 1981 King

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work