How Do the Land Use Patterns in Hebburn Compare with the Urban Models of Burgess and Hoyt?

Authors Avatar

How Do the Land Use Patterns in Hebburn Compare with the Urban Models of Burgess and Hoyt?

In my coursework I will be trying to answer the question above. I will identify what the models of Burgess and Hoyt are and how useful they are in showing how towns develop. Burgess and Hoyt are land use models, which demonstrate that towns develop and grow in a pattern, with the CBD (Central Business District) as the main focal point and that towns develop and outwards from this area.

Both models show land use patterns and are based on concentric circles. Burgess is the simpler of the two models; Hoyt’s model is more complicated because the concentric circles intersect one another.

I want to ascertain if my hometown of Hebburn fits into either of these models, to establish this I came up with a series of hypothesis, which I thought might help me to understand whether Hebburn fits into these models.

Hypothesis

One of the aims of my coursework is to try and answer the hypotheses that we came up with in a class discussion.

  • Housing density increases as you move towards the town centre

  • Housing age increases as you move towards the town centre

  • Quality of housing declines as you move towards the town centre

  • Quality of environment declines as you move towards the town centre

  • The price of housing decreases as you move towards the town centre

  • Traditional heavy industry is found along rivers and railways

  • Modern light industry is found where there is good access by road on the edge of the settlement

Data Collection

 

To assist in explaining and in understanding the hypothesis that we had drawn up in class, I knew that I had to try and collect as much data as possible. In lessons we discussed the ways in which data would help us to understand the hypothesis. Although Hebburn is a small town, it would be nearly impossible to collect all of the data that was available to us in such a short period of time, so we decided that the best solution would be to take a sample of data, which would act as an illustration of reality. The sample of data I obtained would have to be relevant to my hypothesis. We decided, in class; that the best way to collect as much data as possible would be to split into groups and each collect different samples of data. We would then collate all of the gathered data together, this way we would have a large representation of data, which would help when answering the hypothesis.

We discussed different methods on how to collect our data, and eventually we decided that we would collect our data starting at the outskirts of Hebburn and work our way towards the town centre.  We would conduct this in four groups, each of us walking a different transect. This meant that we would get a wider spread of data.  To collect our data we needed to decide which route we were going to take, so we obtained a map of Hebburn.  On this map we drew our transects, marking each one a different colour so we didn’t get them mixed up. My groups transect was coloured green and the route we were going to take went from Finchale road to Hebburn Newtown.

On the maps we were to draw concentric circles, this was so our map represented the land use models.  On our map, these circles were 2cm apart, but in reality they represented 200metres.

Each hypothesis would require different data therefore we had to decide what data to collect and the best way to record it.

Data Collection - Housing Density

The first hypothesis I am going to look at is does housing density increase, as you move closer to the central business district? I am investigating this hypothesis to see if I can compare Hebburn to the Burgess model and prove that housing density increases as I get closer to the Central Business District. I looked at both of the models, Burgess and Hoyt, to see what I should be looking for whilst I was looking at Hebburn’s land use patterns. Both models tell me that I should be looking for 19th century workers housing near the CBD and that I should to find large, private housing next to outskirts. Both models show that I should expect to have the least densely packed housing near the outskirts.

Join now!

We decided (as a group) that to collect the information for the housing density hypothesis, we would count the number of houses we passed every 100 metres. We would keep to a consistent 100 metres by measuring on the map every hundred metres and then walk that distance while counting the houses. However, there is a problem with this type of data collection. This is because the number of houses in an area may vary. One area could have many houses in yet another area might not have any houses in at all. As we were only walking a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay