• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this report I will be finding out whether or not congestion zones are a good idea, using researched data, charts and tables to back up my ideas.

Extracts from this document...


Are Congestion Zones A Good Idea? In this report I will be finding out whether or not congestion zones are a good idea, using researched data, charts and tables to back up my ideas. The conclusion of this matter relies on how accurate and reliable the information is. Congestion Zones are used in hope that traffic gets reduced. The mayor of London has recently put congestion zones into place in hopes they will reduce traffic by 15%. Critics of the scheme however, say that it is unworkable and unfair. They also claim it will probably lead to more congestion as people try to avoid the charging areas. Central London has had a dramatic cut in traffic since the introduction of the congestion charge. 40 000 less people are driving through the zone each Some people agree with the congestion charge, and can produce many facts to support their view. My source one can also provide many facts and figures. Source one says that since the congestion zone was put into place, traffic had been cut by 18%, and delays were down by 30% since the congestion zone has been bought in, the advantage of congestion zone was clear as the traffic was rapidly decreasing after the introduction of congestion zones. If the traffic is reduced then there will be no delays so not that much pollution released in to the atmosphere; which leads to climate effects for example global warming. ...read more.


This effects the people around that area as they live in an atmosphere filled with bio-products. Thus, many would use buses to travel instead of their own cars. This again results in a disadvantage of congestion zones as there is more buses equals' huge amount of pollution made by one bus against 10 cars. Congestion charges can affect people and also businesses. This is because businesses have lost profits after the congestion zones were placed. As businesses need stock delivery which might need to cross the charging area which trails to extra costs, leading to lower profits. The workers might have to cross the congestion zone to go to work every day, resulting in quitting that job. This again affects the businesses to lose their workers. The evidence from source 1 supports my point as it states that 68% of retail businesses said the scheme would have been better without the charge. Source reliability can make all the difference, which is why I have picked three very reliable sources. My Source one is a report by BBCNEWS. I feel this makes it very reliable. This is because the BBC is a well-known and trusted organisation, backed by the government. The Source also includes exclusive interviews for the BBC by the mayor of the time, Ken Livingstone. ...read more.


One of the negative effects of the congestion charge is its knock-on effect on the wider community; with people looking for new routes, surrounding areas could become clogged with congestion, and we would have the same problem all over again. To conclude, after considering all the evidence for both sides, I think that overall congestion charges are a good idea. That's not to say that it doesn't have its negative points though, because it does. The information that most helped me reach my decision was the data I found, and my source 1, BBCNEWS report. This is because I feel the health of the people will be improving, and you can't really argue with that. Also, the fact that the money is being spent on the public- which I think is a brilliant idea. However, like I have said, the congestion charge does not come without its negative points, such as: people paying a 'double tax' when they have no choice, delays and congestion being created on alternate routes due to drivers trying to avoid the congestion charge area, and also, the fact that some businesses are suffering is something that I find quite unacceptable. So yes, the system does need some tweaking, but overall think it is a good idea that initially solves a problem. I think my conclusion is valid because I have considered all of the evidence and made an educated decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Human Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Human Geography essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Economics Coursework- Traffic Congestion

    4 star(s)

    Also the market for car transport will decrease as there is a reduced demand for cars and the market for public transport will increase, as there is an increase in demand for public transport as it is cheap and cost effective.

  2. To what extend has the Congestion Charge in London been successful?

    London by the mean time it takes workers to travel, on average they will be travelling roughly 9 mph to get to work. Static and slow traffic generates more air pollution and produces more carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas. These are called Negative Externalities.

  1. Geography Conclusion- traffic congestion

    From the commuters I interviewed, there was a large agreement over the fact that over half of the interviewees supported the view that the main source of traffic congestion was vehicles. This has been put into a sub-headed column on my questionnaire as there were many different reasons for traffic congestion but the majority could be sub-headed under "vehicles".

  2. Overstrand report

    Also most tourist enjoy walking, getting a sun tan or just relax on the beach, but that will not be possible, as the sand on the beach would have been washed away with long-shore drift. So hotel owners would not get as much money as they did get in a few years back.

  1. Enquiry: Investigation into Retail.

    Also, the transport amenities are very different. In Rotherham CBD, there are good public transport links, with a large bus station within metres of the centre of the CBD. However, Parkgate doesn't have the same extent of public transport links within close range of the retail park (it only has a few bus stops scattered around the complex entrances).

  2. Aid and Development Report

    Some of there people didn't want to move house. Building the dam was very tiresome work. 30,000 people laboured day and night to construct it. The Aswan high dam sometimes gets blocked by silt and mud. Therefore, it has to be cleaned regularly which is very expensive.

  1. It was a selfish idea to build the long groyne at hengistbury head

    Without it, the head would be at increasing risk of eroding further and further back, losing more and more land. This would be very unsuitable, due to the vast amount of people that live around/visit the head, homes and attractions would be destroyed, as well as memories.

  2. "What are the characteristics of Garstang's functional zones?"

    What is the pattern of EQA scores across the town, and how does the pattern relate to the different functional zones found? 7) What is the town's pattern of Pedestrian Flow Measurements and of Traffic Flow Measurements, and how can the two patterns be related?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work