• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19

Investigating whether there is a relationship between size of settlement and its functional index and sphere of influence.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigating whether there is a relationship between size of settlement and its functional index and sphere of influence. Aim and hypotheses: My aim is to test the following relationships: -The larger the population of a settlement, the higher the functional index will be. -The greater the functional index, the larger the sphere of influence will be. -People travel further for higher order goods and services, and do not travel as far for lower order goods and services. Hypothesis: I predict that if a settlement has a higher population, the functional index of that settlement will be higher. I think this because the Central Place Theory states that if a settlement is larger, it can support a higher level of services. Taking this into account, I have made a second prediction, which is that the higher the functional index, the larger the sphere of influence will be. This is because I think that people will travel further for higher order goods and services. A place with a high functional index (for example Reading), selling middle and high order goods such as clothing, jewellery and electronics will attract more people than a settlement selling middle and low order goods such as food. I also predict that the higher the population of a settlement, the larger the sphere of influence will be. Once again, taking into account that the Central Place Theory states that the larger the population of a settlement, the higher level of services it can support and the larger the sphere of influence will be. I think that this is because a settlement with a higher population is able to support higher order services, which people travel further for, thus creating a larger sphere of influence. ...read more.

Middle

compared to its relatively small population of 8,000. Twyford had a larger functional index than I expected, as its population is relatively I took the functional index of each settlement. I took the functional index of each place by recording which shops and services were in each of the settlements. Larger settlements had much larger functional indexes than the smaller settlements. For example, Charvil is a very small settlement (with a population size of 2442). Its functional index is only 7. Reading is a much larger settlement with a population of over 143,000. The functional index of Reading is 585, which is much higher than that of Charvil. These results support my hypothesis. The larger settlements can support a higher number of shops and services. Also, because I have ranked the shops and services so that higher order shops and services have a higher score, the functional indexes show that Reading, as it is a larger settlement, can support higher order goods and services. These results show that my hypothesis is correct, and that higher populations can support a larger number of higher order goods and services. The table below shows which settlements have higher, lower, and middle order goods. This explains why some of the towns with smaller populations have higher functional indexes. Settlement Low Order Middle Order High Order Reading 79 194 34 Maidenhead 43 110 30 Newbury 61 111 27 Wokingham 53 99 29 Earley 26 31 10 Woodley 30 53 22 Caversham 45 46 10 Henley 51 123 34 Winnersh 9 5 1 Twyford 26 30 20 Wargrave 14 12 4 Charvil 9 2 0 Shiplake 3 1 0 Marlow 30 96 30 Sonning 7 7 0 The table shows that generally in the larger settlements like Reading and Newbury there are more middle order shops and services than lower and higher. ...read more.

Conclusion

A lot of settlements will also have shops outside the main shopping centre. I would not have counted these shops and services in my functional index. Another thing which could have affected my results is that conditions such as the weather could have affected my survey. Less people are likely to be out in my chosen settlements if it was raining, for example. Also, my population sizes are not very accurate, as the values which I have are probably out of date, although they are from a reliable source. To improve the accuracy of my results I could do a survey of which shops and services are situated outside the main town centre of the settlement or I could make sure I have seen the whole of the settlement and recorded each shop or service in the area, although this would be difficult due to time limitations. It is also difficult to take questionnaires at exactly the same time on the same day each week, and it is impossible to take each questionnaire in exactly the same conditions as the other. I cannot improve the accuracy of the population values as they are estimates taken from other sources, and I cannot calculate the population size of each settlement myself. Also, population estimates become unreliable and inaccurate quite quickly. I think that I would need to take more than 25 questionnaires in each settlement and use more than 15 settlements in this investigation to properly prove my hypotheses accurately. To extend my research I would need to research the accessibility of each settlement. I would also take a bi-polar analysis of each place. Due to time limitations I could not extend my research, although I am quite pleased with my results, as my Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient showed that the correlation between the population size and the functional index was 99.9% likely to not have occurred by chance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Human Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Human Geography essays

  1. Investigating the Spheres of influence between two major shopping centres.

    Area of residence: This is the main result which shows the sphere of influence for the two shopping centres. I can see that the main bulk of shoppers at Castlepoint are locals, i.e. from Charminster, Winton and surrounding areas.

  2. Sphere of Influence

    Good infrastructure means the sphere of influence is likely to increase as it is easy to get and people will enjoy getting there but poor infrastructure means that the sphere of influence is likely to decrease as people have trouble getting there.

  1. geography settlement

    Flat land, fertile land, close to resources, such as a water source or forest for wood, good communications such as roads, port, navigable river and a bridge over the river are just a few factors that will influenced the situation of a settlement.

  2. Large Central Business Districts and their Sphere of influence

    crime and attractiveness. Data analysis Table interpretations on the map of Newcastle Gateshead. Table 1 Table 1 had the highest total pedestrian count (367 in total), the second count was higher (by 7) than the first count. This shows that Transect 1, Northumberland Street, was the busiest street in that day.

  1. Windsor Investigation

    I believe that the information I have obtained as fairly accurate and think that my respondents were a good representation of the population; however I think I could improve certain aspects and get more accurate results by visiting more than once.

  2. Does the Bentalls Shopping Centre in Kingston Upon Thames meet the needs of the ...

    This I have identified that with my results. Each service and facility in the Bentalls Centre I commented and marked on. If I gave one facility a 5 that means it is excellent, whilst giving another facility 1 then it would be poor and I would have to say why.

  1. Analysis of sphere of influence in different shopping centres. Like Merry Hill and ...

    Dudley had its lowest overall average score for Greenery with a score of 1.6. I think that there was one anomaly and that was that Merry Hill had the highest average score for most of the criteria's that we marked all of the locations on, however it had the lowest

  2. GCSE Geography Settlement Coursework

    This means that it will have fewer staff to the other Costa in Oxford. The Costa in Summertown is very popular because it is unique to the other shops in Summertown, whilst there are many different cafes in Oxford. It should attract less people than the Costa in the Claredon

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work