• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nike - good or bad?

Extracts from this document...


Nike is good: A factory called Samyang in Vietnam (a factory under Nike contract) seems to be keeping satisfactory working levels within the building. It employs 5,200 people, most of them being women. The factory is made up of six big buildings with well-kept surroundings. Inside, there are fans keeping the workers cool, fire extinguishers about in the case of an emergency, and workers can easily access goggles, masks and gloves if they need them. Workers get double the local average of $54 per month and an annual bonus of at least one month's salary. Other factories get a lot less - in rural areas, factories pay $35 per month, in suburbs they pay $40 per month, and in cities, $45 per month. ...read more.


The investigator found that Nike had indeed replaced the compound and had also installed local exhaust ventilation systems. They also discovered that Nike had trained certain staff personnel aspects of health and safety. Nike is bad: Nike does not own the factories their clothes are manufactured in. This means they can leave at any time, leaving thousands of workers unemployed and fighting for their life while they find another job. For example, on February 22nd 2008, the BJ&J factory in the Dominic Republic announced that it was going to slowly fire workers and close. The factory, owned by Korean company called Yupoong, was making Nike caps at the time. In the Tae Kwang Vina factory mentioned earlier, some health and safety issues remained. ...read more.


Some people think that the minimum wage in countries is enough to survive because the cost of living in that particular country is lower too. The chart below proves this to be wrong with three primary countries that Nike manufactures in. Nike doesn't pay lots to its workers. In many countries, they live way under the predicted living wage. The table shows the average wage of all the factories in that country, and the living wage in each. The data presented is only an average. Some factory workers earn only $1.60 a day, where the price of three meals a day is $2.00. Country Average wage per hour Living wage per hour China 23 cents 85 cents Nicaragua 23 cents 80 cents Haiti 30 cents 58 cents ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Human Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Human Geography essays

  1. Geography of haiti.

    They have policies to attract investments. Such investments are often associated with multinational corporations. The right conditions have to be in place e.g. security, peace, law and legislation, freedom of market, local labour supply , legal issue: protection for the investors property and rights, tax regime etc.

  2. Northstowe Good or Bad

    It used the "Radburn" design principle which is where vehicles and pedestrians are segregated by having a perimeter road which has residential cul-de-sacs inside, linked by pedestrian routes leading to the village centre. Bar Hill was divided into 12 parts residentially and it was up to private developers who would meet some of the cost of village infrastructure and services.

  1. "What are the characteristics of Garstang's functional zones?"

    the less it has to worry about whether or not it can afford to pay the rent on the land (look at Figure 8). The main use of Garstang's functional zones is for residential purposes. Garstang's housing status can be split into five categories: upper class housing, upper middle class housing, lower middle class housing and lower class housing.

  2. Modern Living.

    There were, however, further charges of keeping disorderly alehouses in 1727 (against John Irons, Robert Ratford and John Chapman) and, in 1733, against William Hammond. This last charge seems to have been connected with two other charges before the Court at the same time: Thomas Gardiner was charged with `being

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work