How does Heaney explore cruelty, pain and neglect in 'Limbo' and 'Bye-Child'?

Authors Avatar

How does Heaney explore cruelty, pain and neglect in ‘Limbo’ and ‘Bye-Child’?

        The poems, “Limbo” and “Bye-Child”, were both written by Heaney, depicting the message of child cruelty and neglect from both the mothers and childs view. In, “Limbo”, the poems show a mother who has to commit infanticide, whereas in, “Bye-Child”, the child is kept alive, but hidden away and neglected. Both mothers have resorted to these acts in the name of religion, as both children were born illegitimately and if known to the world, their mothers would both be victims of persecution and shunned from society. “Limbo”, use’s a mixture of fishing and religious vocabulary throughout the poem. In contrast, “Bye-Child”, is partly written in a cold, newspaper style text. Initially, first impressions may lead the reader to believe that Heaney wants to show the cruelty, pain and neglect experienced by the child victims, but as you delve deeper, we can see that the pain experienced by the mothers is always shown.

        The title, “Limbo”, refers to the Catholic meaning of the place where unbaptized children go; it is neither Heaven, nor Hell. “Bye-Child”, is told through the rememberment of a newspaper report. The opening paragraph in the style of a newspaper article, the child’s horrific life ordeal has been documented in a newspaper and is being remembered from the article.

 “Limbo”, opens with, “Fishermen at Ballyshannon, netted an infant last night”. The opening line, informs us that an infant has been found in the waters. The use of the word, “netted”, shows how unimportant the child is, it has just been hauled in with the fishes, “Along with the salmon”, just another catch for the fishermen. Heaney then goes on to state exactly why the child came to this morbid fate, he was an, “Illegitimate spawning”, the mother became pregnant out of wedlock, but the negative use of,  “spawning” poses the imagery that the child was something grotesque to society and unwanted by religion and social surroundings. This therefore enhances the question of what horrible acts people resort to in the name of religion. In contrast, the opening of, “Bye-Child”, opens with a direct newspaper report style paragraph. The child was, “discovered in the henhouse”, which first gives a shocking impression of neglect and cruelty; why would someone lock their child away? It carries on to give a possible answer, “She had confined him”, which shows that maybe the child was put away for his own safety, again, from society and its religious persecutions; he was not put away for punishment and cruelty, therefore the thought of this horrible act transforms into a act which does not now seem as harsh.

Join now!

The first stanza of, “Bye-Child”, describes enclosed child and his surroundings. We are reminded subtly of his environment, “A yolk of light”, yolk relating to the henhouse. The victim has no name, referred to only as, “The child”, his pain is mirrored here in when he puts his, “eye to a chink”, trying to catch a glimpse of the outside world, Heaney here showing how the child has to be hidden from the world, but also protected from it. The issue that the act is not only done in cruelty, but for protection is raised here.

The second stanza ...

This is a preview of the whole essay