• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How necessary or convenient is the legal concept of marriage today?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay following family supervision one Laura Jenkins Jesus College, Part II How necessary or convenient is the legal concept of marriage today? Social and legal changes since 1857 have slowly eroded the concept that marriage is "until death us do part". Although most marriages do still end in the death of one partner, an increasing number end in divorce (this number has increased fourfold in the last thirty years1), and many people choose the relative flexibility of merely living together, a situation which would have been impossible a hundred years ago for social reasons. So, in the twenty-first century, how necessary is the concept of marriage? Could we abolish it altogether? For the reasons outlined below it is quite clear that the answer to the latter point is a resounding "no", while the answer to the former is that marriage is still the only legal institution which gives rise to a particular set of legal rights and responsibilities. The first, relatively minor, point to make is that the Church of England remains the official religion of the UK; marriage is an important part of that religion, and while the Anglican church is still the established church of the UK, marriage will remain a necessary institution. ...read more.

Middle

Again, this seems to give the legal advantage to married couples, who find the law enforces a substantial right and benefit which the merely co-habiting partner does not receive. There are also important benefits for married parents, particularly married fathers. A child born to a married couple is registered as the child of both spouses (whether the father is the real father or not), in the absence of contrary instruction (i.e. an alternative father). In contrast, unmarried fathers have no such automatic right to be registered as the parent of the baby; they have to accompany the mother to register the birth, essentially meaning both that they can be shut out of gaining parental responsibility where they wish to play a role in the child's life or can abandon the mother and child and refuse to accept their responsibility at all. Neither of these scenarios are ideal as arguments between parents can lead to one partner being shut out of the child's life, which is undesirable from the point of view of the child's welfare, or enables parents to ignore their responsibility by not, in some cases, forcing it upon them. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the moment, there is no clear replacement for marriage as a legal institution, therefore it is necessary to preserve and provide the benefits outlined above to people within a relationship. It is difficult to see what could replace it: a merely civil partnership would not satisfy the church, or indeed the sensibilities of many people while giving co-habiting partners all the same rights as married partners would not be desirable either, as there are people who co-habit for the relative freedom etc. that it affords them. Thus marriage remains a convenient concept until the lawmakers are able to find an alternative arrangement which fulfils the necessities of marriage in the eyes of the church and law, while balancing the delicacies of social policy at the same time. Marriage as it stands at the moment is probably therefore the best option available from all points of view, although as society continues to change, the legislative must be sure to respond to the needs of the electorate in adapting the law to protect those in co-habiting couples, whether hetro- or homo-sexual, to ensure that there does not become an underclass purely based upon a quasi-religious ceremony. 1 23 Social Trends, 2.15 (1993) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Child Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Child Development essays

  1. Why family structures are changing.

    this is the Spin's way for improvement, it is clear from this that this service strives to improve families living conditions. Another clear advantage of this service for families experiencing difficulties is the fact that they work with the communities.

  2. Health and Social care

    The older Seahorse children benefit from time spent in the 'Seashell Group'. The purpose of this is to give them access to different activities and helps prepare them for the transition to Dolphins. This is important so the children feel they are gradually increasing their intellectual development.

  1. Children and the Law.

    which is governed by s.44 of the Children Act. The purpose of this order is to enable Daniel and Ellie to be provided with immediate short term protection in a genuine emergency and it also gives the local authority limited parental responsibility so they can adequately investigate the situation and have the power to take appropriate action.

  2. The main aim of this paper is to compare and contrast parental rights and ...

    To this effect, is the case of Mwakasula v Moyo,18 where after the dissolution of the marriage in favour of the respondent wife, a marriage that had been contracted in accordance with the patrilineal system of law, the court ordered that the appellant should lose both the children and the dowry he may have paid towards the marriage.

  1. Good Practice Within the Legislative Framework.

    child does not return home until the end of the investigation due to there being a threat of possible harm, three types of orders can be applied for. The Temporary assessment order, the Court Assessment order and Child protection order.

  2. Private International Law

    Case law however seems to dictate that a domicile of choice will not be lost unless there is a positive intention never to return.10 This seems in line with the British view taken on revival of domicile of origin. Reform of this area has been advocated but as of 1976 the time in question no reforms had been implemented.

  1. Explain the context, concept, lessons and recommendations from the Norsk Hydro's Utkal Venture case ...

    While some critics argue that the only reason organization start a project is utilitarian that they see commercial benefit in order improve their reputation with the public or the government. The evolving CSR agenda for mining companies is driven by a global shift in the way the role of business is perceived.

  2. Legal & Welfare

    When speaking to little children you should use appropriate language because different ages won't understand the same level of language. For example using a different level of language for 5 year olds and another for 14 year olds. You can put CCTV (Closed Circuit TeleVision)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work