• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Some people agree with dropping the life long marriage vow this is because they believe marriage would be more attractive because people will not be frightened about the life long commitment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Option 2A Marriage Some people disagree with church dropping the vow because people wouldn't find marriage serious and get married without thinking about the life long commitment, so more people end up divorced. Also if the couple are strong Christians they wouldn't want to break Gods words 'What God has joined together, let no one separate' (Mk Ch 10 6-8) and if they did they would feel guilty about it. I think this is a strong argument you can see that people are getting married without thinking of the commitment because of the number of people getting divorced (two thirds of marriages end up in divorce). Another argument against this statement is that the couple who aren't married would have to work even harder to stay together because there would be less security this is because the couple wouldn't have the promise to each other to stay together for life, this means that one of the partners could walk out on the relationship but if they were married they couldn't. ...read more.

Middle

This is strong argument because children are really important in a marriage and can be affected in later life if their parents split and could end up hating either one of their parents because of it. Some people agree with dropping the life long marriage vow this is because they believe marriage would be more attractive because people will not be frightened about the life long commitment, which means people will be able to get married but would still be able to do what they want and if they do split up they wouldn't have to go through divorce and they wouldn't be seen as a failure if they were Christians. I think this is a poor argument because if marriage is made more attractive by dropping the life long marriage vow more couples will get married and then get divorced and the marriage vow wouldn't have its true meaning anymore. ...read more.

Conclusion

If the child's parents did split up the child could still have both parents if the child's parent met a new partner and it would feel secure because it would have both parents even thought the new parent was it's real parent. But the child could be hurt by this situation because the new parent could be abusive and even turn the real parent against the child so the child would have no one to look after them. I think this is a poor argument because I think children are more stable if their parents are in a life long marriage because neither of the parents could walk out on the on the family. My opinion is that the lifelong marriage vow shouldn't be kept because even though we have the vow no-one is following it which is shown by how many more people are getting divorced and having affairs and without it people will feel more free and if they did end up getting divorced it wouldn't be seen as wrong in the Catholic Church's eyes so they wouldn't feel guilty. Rebecca Moss 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Child Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Child Development essays

  1. Practical Life Exercises And Why They Are Attractive To Children

    But in man there is this other fact, creation of human intelligence" - Dr.Montessori According to Dr.Montessori "Children pass through definite periods in which they reveal aptitudes and possibilities which afterwards disappear" that is why they show immense interest in some particular activity or action at some point of time

  2. A life course perspective

    (Bee, H ,1994) Eriksons and other staged models could be described as too rigid and prescriptive. Real life doesn't neatly fit into neat stages, society is changing and people go along different paths. One of the major difficulties with these models is that they no longer apply to today's life patterns.

  1. "The use of innocence in literature is never innocent" How far do you agree ...

    There, Rahel imagines that kangaroo shaped dustbins are in fact alive : "The middle one rummaged in her pouch for a long cigarette stub to smoke. She found an old cashew nut in a dim plastic bag. She gnawed it with her front teeth like a rodent."

  2. Why family structures are changing.

    for him he understands what his father did for him while he was younger. Currently Pete can feel secure in his own home and when he is at home he gets his food brought to him by care workers this is another chance for Pete to socialise, however problems have

  1. Development through the life stages

    might see a child comfort a peer who is hurt or even cry when he sees another child who is upset. Children also love to say ?no!? and struggle with resolving conflicts with friends. Children develop more advanced social play skills, such as sharing and turn-taking, over time as they near the age of 3 and beyond.

  2. Child development study - I will compare my visits and look at Aroushs development ...

    (http://wondertime.go.com/learning/article/get-a-grip-pincer-grasp.html ). Visit Before I went to Aroush?s house, I called to ask weather we could go out somewhere. Aroush?s mum said that that was fine. When I went to Aroush?s house, Aroush?s mum was getting Aroush and her self ready, so we could go shopping.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work