There has been an on-going debate about the relationship between the ideas of Vygotsky and Piaget for many years. A comparison of learning theories will be made between these two psychologists.

Authors Avatar

There has been an on-going debate about the relationship between the ideas of Vygotsky and Piaget for many years.

A comparison of learning theories will be made between these two psychologists.

Vygotsky is remembered mainly for his theory of social constructivism in which he believed that cognitive development can be understood as the transformation of basic, biologically determined processes into higher psychological functions. This implies that children are born with a diverse range of perceptual, attentional and memory capacities which are substantially transformed in the context of socialisation and education. Put in a very simple manner, the theory is that children are only as cognitively developed as the culture in which they live allows. For Vygotsky the culture and environment in which a child grows over-rides the mental and cognitive schema processes outlined by Piaget.

Join now!

“Vygotsky was aware of Piaget’s work but unlike Piaget, he believed that the social environment was just as important in the child’s cognitive as biological maturation. Modern research shows that Piaget seems to have seriously underestimated social influences in this area”.       (N.Hayes and S.Orrell , 1998)

J.B.Watson (1913) believed that “thought is language” whereas Piaget was saying the opposite to this, he believed “language is thought”.

For Piaget it is thinking which is the most important and the child only develops language because it is a useful tool of thought. Vygotsky however disagrees ...

This is a preview of the whole essay