• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“A long period of repression and gloom” - Discuss this view of Nicholas I reign.

Extracts from this document...


"A long period of repression and gloom" - Discuss this view of Nicholas I reign. Nicholas I reign has been described as a 'particularly dark period of Russian history' full of repression and gloom. Nicholas' restrictive policies, use of force as a means of restraint, stagnation and lack of progress suggest his reign was one of repression and gloom. However, it would be a mistake to dismiss Nicholas as 'merely a repressive monarch' because reforms were introduced and some progress was made. Nicholas' reign began amid the 'revolutionary fiasco' of the Decembrist Rising, causing him to begin his reign with repressive action in order to stop the insurrection. He was compelled to use the force of arrests, executions and exiles to restrain the revolutionaries, therefore, acting repressively. Five leaders were executed and three thousand people were arrested, of which over one thousand were exiled to Siberia. Nicholas' attitude to the rising was repressive because he believed his prompt actions had saved Russia from revolution and change. It could be said that the Decembrist Rising caused Nicholas to be repressive because he thought 'Revolution is at the gates of Russia' but swore 'that it shall not enter' as long as he was Tsar. ...read more.


Nicholas' censorship policies appear to be repressive because they did not allow any freedom of expression. The Censorship Law in 1826 allowed the authorities to ban almost anything if they wanted to. However, it was not applied strictly and in 1828, more lenient laws were introduced, but after 1830, censorship once again became 'strict, unfair and often absurd'. Writers could be shadowed, imprisoned or exiled and articles on poverty and serfdom were forbidden. The censorship laws show that Nicholas' reign was repressive. The number of people exiled in Nicholas' reign could be seen to be repressive because 150,000 people were exiled to Siberia during his reign. During his reign, Nicholas used the force of exiling as a means of punishment as he exiled 10000 people a year for undetermined periods of time. Intellectuals such as Dostoievsky were exiled to forced labour camps. The number of people exiled shows how repressive the reign of Nicholas was. Nicholas' attitude towards foreign travel appears to be repressive because it was forbidden. Even wealthy people could only travel under rigid conditions through a passport system. ...read more.


Nicholas tried to abolish serfdom by establishing a secret committee of leading reformers such as Speransky and Kiselev to examine the feasibility of gradual liberation. The committee introduced reforms such as prohibiting the sale of serfs as a means of settling private debt, and the auctions ended. Literature and the arts flourished and Russian was transformed into one of the worlds greatest languages be Pushkin. Currency reforms established confidence and stability in the monetary system and Nicholas was concerned about corruption so appointed a committee which reorganised the courts. Nicholas therefore, did introduce some reforms which imply that his reign was not completely one of repression and gloom. Although Nicholas' reign is notable for intellectual and creative achievement, economic and technical advances and attempts to introduce moderate reforms in government and the lives of state peasants, it is still characterised as a period of repression and gloom. Nicholas used force to repress the Decembrist Rising, education was brought under government control, the Third Section surpressed any liberal ideas, censorship laws restricted freedom of expression and the policy of 'Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality' promoted Russian traditions and blocked change. Nicholas' lack of change and reform suggest his reign was a period of repression and gloom. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Lenin had to grapple with the situation of a struggle of power in his Testament, but it did not help the situation very much as Lenin gave no clear directive on how Lenin saw the future. Presumably he hoped for a collective leadership although this was never spelt out.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Of the troops of several nationalities under British command on the Archangel front the Director of Military Operations at the war Office reported in March 1919 that their morale was 'so low as to render them a prey to the very active and insidious Bolshevik propaganda which the enemy are carrying out with increasing energy and skill.'

  1. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    This in turn encouraged education among the lower classes. The length of service was reduced from the "life sentence" of 25 years to only 6 years, plus a further 9 years in a reserve unit. Officer training was also improved and there was a much more open system of promotion

  2. How valid is the view that the reign of, Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    not teaching them so much that they learned to question the authority of the state, as this would have inspired revolution. Given this, it could be argued that Alexander II was a brave man to allow university lectures on philosophy and constitutional law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work